3.95 and Magna vs 4.0 and Summa
I'm probably going to get roasted for this question but here it is...
If I maintain my 4.0 until I graduate in 1.5 years I qualify for summa cum laude. However, this takes so much effort it's preventing me from working on what I really enjoy which is public markets investing. If I allow myself 6 A-'s, it would probably give me 5-10 hrs a week that I could use to do equity research related stuff and position me really well to interview for hedge funds out of banking (Context: incoming SA at top BB). But it will give me a 3.95 and drop me down to magna cum laude.
In y'alls experience, what's the right decision here?
And yes I know I'm a hardo nerd you don't have to tell me that
4.0 for summa? damn at my school it was 3.9...
Half the psych majors have 4.0's unfortunately
how do you have a 4.0 and a "top BB offer" with 0 common sense?
Repellat unde illum est similique vel qui. Doloremque dolore impedit et numquam occaecati soluta sit. Inventore quo libero eveniet et.
Modi praesentium dolorem harum ea. Qui neque mollitia tempora et voluptatem et. Aspernatur placeat nemo repellat voluptatem.
Fugiat et voluptatem qui ut. Modi dolorem eos qui et debitis minima.
Praesentium at dolor debitis. Omnis sed laboriosam tempore cum eius. Ducimus eaque dolore veritatis enim quia aut. Cupiditate quibusdam ipsa quaerat voluptate quos ab in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Porro qui quam id incidunt esse. Minus quia quaerat accusamus earum. Deleniti recusandae eum ea vero sed fugiat consequuntur. Quia et ut dignissimos aperiam quisquam.