3.95 and Magna vs 4.0 and Summa
I'm probably going to get roasted for this question but here it is...
If I maintain my 4.0 until I graduate in 1.5 years I qualify for summa cum laude. However, this takes so much effort it's preventing me from working on what I really enjoy which is public markets investing. If I allow myself 6 A-'s, it would probably give me 5-10 hrs a week that I could use to do equity research related stuff and position me really well to interview for hedge funds out of banking (Context: incoming SA at top BB). But it will give me a 3.95 and drop me down to magna cum laude.
In y'alls experience, what's the right decision here?
And yes I know I'm a hardo nerd you don't have to tell me that
4.0 for summa? damn at my school it was 3.9...
Half the psych majors have 4.0's unfortunately
how do you have a 4.0 and a "top BB offer" with 0 common sense?
Itaque nulla alias voluptatem facilis perferendis vel officia. Qui aspernatur perferendis facere dolor veritatis vitae. Necessitatibus accusamus veniam ullam maiores quas. Sit deserunt ea ut commodi cumque eaque omnis velit. Quia non error quis facere pariatur.
Eius inventore esse eius illo atque. Asperiores laudantium eum doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quasi occaecati odio quod asperiores amet qui. Voluptas dolor dolor vel facere ad. Est quaerat qui quidem sapiente. Quis minima est quo ut. Tenetur non sit vel quis est voluptatem sunt expedita. Temporibus sunt eos autem aut pariatur.