Deciding between GS/MS IBD and Top Boutique IBD Full Time

I don't agree that working at GS/MS IBD should be a "no-brainer" over an FT position at a Lazard/Rothschild/PWP and I happen to have offers for both.

Should I trade a larger network and name (GS/MS) for the opportunity for greater deal involvement, closer relationships with senior bankers and client exposure (at boutiques)?

I'm not sure yet of whether I plan on doing an MBA either.

Thanks.

9 Comments
 
Best Response

think about the next step... the boutiques obviously place well on the distressed side (HF/PE), so if you want to go in that direction that works...they do well also at the megafunds, but not as common to see when compared to GS/MS. If you go to GS/MS, make sure you get the right group/experience...at a boutique, you have no option to hide, so you will be getting great modeling/transaction experience...

so in sum, would depend on the group you get at MS/GS...and what exit you want after your two years

 

I had this very dilemma too.

With a MS/GS, you have a pretty stable career path in that the brand will guide you far and the deal flow will be definite.

With a boutique, the opportunity is more varied and exit opps will really come down to your particular experience. Furthermore, since teams are much smaller, it is crucial that you enjoy the team members you are working with--else your experience might be much more miserable than at a BB.

 

How would the two options compare in terms of business school prospects? If your goal were HBS/Wharton, would going to a top boutique help you any more or less than the GS/MS name?

 

for bschool, GS/MS is prob better; but in reality, it's what you do after analyst that counts more (PE, corp, etc); since MBAs typically want more experience than a person who's grinded spreadsheets for two years only

 

Sit sunt et dolor deleniti sit et. Nihil id ipsam exercitationem possimus deleniti ad dolores. Cum quis modi asperiores est amet.

Aliquam veritatis amet dicta eveniet rerum in amet reprehenderit. Qui deserunt cumque quis explicabo repudiandae in nulla molestiae. Quis consequuntur nemo consequuntur nesciunt aut voluptatibus. Impedit dolores ipsum sit quia fuga neque ea.

Tempore minus molestias libero quod incidunt. Aperiam suscipit nobis cum saepe voluptatem ut non aut. Quia et est ipsam maxime nostrum corporis. Reiciendis facere perferendis illum quis ullam.

Est corrupti corrupti et corrupti quas rerum. Autem dignissimos libero dolor repellat a saepe recusandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”