Does (verbally accepting an offer) count as reneging?

I am in trouble at my school for reneging on an offer that I said yes to verbally.

I DID NOT sign anything accepting the offer.

I thought reneging meant signing an official document accepting an offer and then saying no to it.

22 Comments
 

who cares. do what is best for you. if that involves renegging on a previous offer to go get another one that is better for you, do it.

If it's UBS, etc. (you get the idea) you could just tell them that you are indefinitely deferring your employment (see: comp deferral)

Question: tell the school to go fuck themselves. (actually not a question)

"They are all former investment bankers that were laid off in the economic collapse that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have no marketable skills, but by God they work hard."
 

Like the poster above, schools care about their rep which comes from the preparedness and behavior of their students. If an employer gets pissed they will choose not to return next year which the school does not want.

In my opinion, you dropped tens of thousands on bullshit credit hours and books these professors updated every year and required you to have so do whats best for you. Markets change. Your market did and if the roles were reversed they would drop you like a bad habit. Fuck what some OCR department says in an email. It's your life.

 

Is this for FT or SA? I'm guessing SA

Although I agree with the "do what's best for you", you need to be very careful about how you handle yourself during SA recruitment. If you renege on a company and your school finds out, they may blacklist you from FT OCR, which is a pretty big deal. It's happened in the past

If it's for FT, then obviously you should choose what's best for your career. Reneging is still frowned upon, but the negative ramifications, especially from your school, are significantly reduced.

 

Its deceptive to accept an offer while continuing to interview at other firms.

Imagine that a company offered you a position, then rescinded the offer before your start date because they found a "better" candidate. Would you ever want to work the people there? Would you ever trust the people there?

Now I'm sure that this does occur (for both sides), but it doesn't change the fact that its fundamentally deceptive. If I were the hiring manager for one of the "other" companies, I would probably ding you and notify the company that extended the initial offer.

 

They would do it to you. Do what is best for you. People have a short memory and sometimes I feel like people on this board forget that.

"They are all former investment bankers that were laid off in the economic collapse that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have no marketable skills, but by God they work hard."
 
BearearnsI have seen candidates not pass background checks... so until deal is done anything can change. Happens all the time with lawyers and finance that deals dont close and things change. Until name is dotted and crossed. It is fair game in my opinion,but it definitely isnt honest faith.

I disagree with your analogy here.

A deal that fails because of execution risk (such as when a company can't raise debt because it can't obtain equity commitments in time, etc) is different from a deal that fails when a client decides to close the deal with another law firm / bank. The difference here is intent. In the former case, the company does not intend to cause the deal to fail whereas in the latter case it does.

The former case to me is the equivalent of a life changing circumstance for the candidate or a failure to meet a basic requirement (e.g. criminal background check). The latter case is the equivalent to a candidate reneging on his/her acceptance.

 
TheBlackSheep
BearearnsI have seen candidates not pass background checks... so until deal is done anything can change. Happens all the time with lawyers and finance that deals dont close and things change. Until name is dotted and crossed. It is fair game in my opinion,but it definitely isnt honest faith.

I disagree with your analogy here.

A deal that fails because of execution risk (such as when a company can't raise debt because it can't obtain equity commitments in time, etc) is different from a deal that fails when a client decides to close the deal with another law firm / bank. The difference here is intent. In the former case, the company does not intend to cause the deal to fail whereas in the latter case it does.

The former case to me is the equivalent of a life changing circumstance for the candidate or a failure to meet a basic requirement (e.g. criminal background check). The latter case is the equivalent to a candidate reneging on his/her acceptance.

How in the world does a candidate fail a criminal background check?
 
Best Response
A Fellow Linguist
TheBlackSheep
BearearnsI have seen candidates not pass background checks... so until deal is done anything can change. Happens all the time with lawyers and finance that deals dont close and things change. Until name is dotted and crossed. It is fair game in my opinion,but it definitely isnt honest faith.

I disagree with your analogy here.

A deal that fails because of execution risk (such as when a company can't raise debt because it can't obtain equity commitments in time, etc) is different from a deal that fails when a client decides to close the deal with another law firm / bank. The difference here is intent. In the former case, the company does not intend to cause the deal to fail whereas in the latter case it does.

The former case to me is the equivalent of a life changing circumstance for the candidate or a failure to meet a basic requirement (e.g. criminal background check). The latter case is the equivalent to a candidate reneging on his/her acceptance.

How in the world does a candidate fail a criminal background check?
By being a criminal.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Accusamus aut earum tempore velit expedita. Porro nihil cum dolorum aut optio accusantium est. Culpa quod rerum libero voluptas dolorem. Illum quam ad qui doloribus soluta. Itaque assumenda enim sit est.

Eos eaque deleniti quisquam. Sit sed maxime corrupti eos unde architecto quasi. Placeat voluptas eveniet saepe quia rerum est sit. Pariatur eligendi laudantium ut. Consequatur id ullam rem neque aut.

In eum doloremque sapiente similique. Praesentium molestias earum aut ex libero tempora. Veniam minima ea quasi possimus vel. Quam recusandae sint dolore assumenda. Aut illo tempora sed voluptate id at. Rem enim numquam nam in. Fuga et sunt et sed recusandae.

Ratione sit labore harum repellendus voluptas velit eius rerum. Consequatur possimus voluptatem quidem iusto et qui dolore. Saepe numquam et dolor eos non.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Ut aspernatur voluptatibus in dolor totam vel. Quis eos cum omnis. Eveniet qui exercitationem eos commodi harum accusantium aut. Ut libero non non consequatur expedita provident vero.

Quo consequatur omnis impedit incidunt exercitationem cum. Vitae quas modi ipsam nostrum nemo eveniet ut. Deleniti eos ipsa soluta voluptatum placeat molestiae. Suscipit et distinctio qui. Odio fugit facilis saepe nisi aut magni. Nostrum consequatur et dolor eius. Rerum voluptas aliquam ratione nemo aut aperiam commodi sed.

Inventore quis ut dolor odio. Hic ea adipisci voluptatem facere. Sint dignissimos sapiente vel ea quam laboriosam ut.

Amet nostrum commodi perferendis ea expedita magni ut. Sed voluptate voluptatibus perferendis nam nam. Non facilis quia adipisci et nobis et. Est qui ea ab quisquam et. Hic fuga est cumque quas soluta facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”