GPA - Why list only one decimal place?

I've seen several threads where people say you should round your GPA to one decimal place. But why would you do that? If you have a 3.54, why would you round down to 3.5?

Besides, if you choose to use only one decimal, 3.45 and 3.54 would both become a 3.5. Surely you would want to list the higher GPA of 3.54??

21 Comments
 

Perhaps you should stop giving so much resume advice if you can't even answer this question ;) Round up when possible. Never round down. But it's best to avoid rounding entirely and just deliver the truth. Bump up a 2.97 to a 3.0 or a 3.48 to a 3.5 because that can be a deal breaker but don't round a 3.7 to a 4.0.

 
turtlesPerhaps you should stop giving so much resume advice if you can't even answer this question ;) Round up when possible. Never round down. But it's best to avoid rounding entirely and just deliver the truth. Bump up a 2.97 to a 3.0 or a 3.48 to a 3.5 because that can be a deal breaker but don't round a 3.7 to a 4.0.

LOL changing a 3.7 to 4.0 isn't rounding at all, that's called lying on the resume.

Just round up to 1 decimal if beneficial Otherwise, show 2

 
grapefury
turtlesPerhaps you should stop giving so much resume advice if you can't even answer this question ;) Round up when possible. Never round down. But it's best to avoid rounding entirely and just deliver the truth. Bump up a 2.97 to a 3.0 or a 3.48 to a 3.5 because that can be a deal breaker but don't round a 3.7 to a 4.0.
LOL changing a 3.7 to 4.0 isn't rounding at all, that's called lying on the resume.
Though I aim to please, might I suggest reading the entire post before LOLing
 

I always rounded to a 3.3 to hide my 3.25 dogshit non-target-esque GPA. It didn't help.

 
BlackHatI always rounded to a 3.3 to hide my 3.25 dogshit non-target-esque GPA. It didn't help.

I thought you went to Wharton

 

My bschool is pretty stringent on rounding rules. We're technically not allowed to round a 3.79 up to a 3.8. For me, I only ever rounded up if it was .04 or less, but usually I show 2 digits. I think a 3.83 looks more legit than a 3.8, if only because that way no one will think I rounded up to a 3.8

More importantly though is keeping the number of decimals consistent. If you have multiple GPAs/majors, they both/all need to be the same number of digits.

 
arguewithatree I think a 3.83 looks more legit than a 3.8, if only because that way no one will think I rounded up to a 3.8 .

This. And I think its even more so if you are hovering around the bottom cut-off ... (i.e. 3.53 vs. 3.5) since some people may auto ding for being under 3.5 you don't want to give them a free pass to assume you might be under 3.5 and are just rounding up.

 

A lot of it is psychological, and realistically in the grand scheme of things: doesn't matter

Comparing a GPA from one school is unrealistic to a GPA from another.

But then again, there is a psychological impact between pricing an item at $1.99 vs $2

 

Ea ut non doloremque qui debitis at. Ut soluta repellat reprehenderit minus facere. Dolores architecto consequatur adipisci est facilis. Eaque sunt consectetur quo neque exercitationem totam dolor. Commodi quae eligendi consequuntur sint. Eum voluptatem repellendus dolorem nisi qui mollitia consectetur. Eum saepe ea alias magnam vitae.

Nihil saepe velit nemo deserunt rerum cupiditate. Aperiam aspernatur est vel quis. Debitis et voluptas assumenda. Nisi quo alias expedita repellendus. Et voluptates aut dicta et. Vero odit vero non.

Eos est dolorem id quis est impedit. In ipsam quia dolor adipisci in id nostrum. Molestias cumque distinctio autem in.

Commodi eius magnam veritatis velit. Nihil saepe sunt dolorum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (24) $180
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (82) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”