9 Comments
 
cakepieUnless you are applying for a legal job, nobody will know or care what it means. Even if you are applying for a legal position you'd probably have to be an editor for it to pay off.

Your first point is simplistic, and your second is just plain wrong.

To my knowledge, making Law Review is looked upon quite favorably in Big Law recruiting. While banking recruiters might not value it so directly, perhaps because they don't necessarily understand what it entails, HR folks (not the brightest) can certainly appreciate when someone else values something. So if you can make a succinct, convincing case for why Law Review is impressive, or better yet turn Law Review into a Big Law offer, which you then leverage for interviews in banking, go for it.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 
Sandhurst
cakepieUnless you are applying for a legal job, nobody will know or care what it means. Even if you are applying for a legal position you'd probably have to be an editor for it to pay off.

Your first point is simplistic, and your second is just plain wrong.

To my knowledge, making Law Review is looked upon quite favorably in Big Law recruiting. While banking recruiters might not value it so directly, perhaps because they don't necessarily understand what it entails, HR folks (not the brightest) can certainly appreciate when someone else values something. So if you can make a succinct, convincing case for why Law Review is impressive, or better yet turn Law Review into a Big Law offer, which you then leverage for interviews in banking, go for it.

You don't sound very familiar with law. Like I said, only TOP biglaw like Wachtell, Cravath, etc. require law review. Even then, if you are simply a member than it will not make up for medicore grades. This dude didn't even mention whether he's on the flagship review or some shitty secondary environmental law review.

 
Best Response
cakepie
Sandhurst
cakepieUnless you are applying for a legal job, nobody will know or care what it means. Even if you are applying for a legal position you'd probably have to be an editor for it to pay off.

Your first point is simplistic, and your second is just plain wrong.

To my knowledge, making Law Review is looked upon quite favorably in Big Law recruiting. While banking recruiters might not value it so directly, perhaps because they don't necessarily understand what it entails, HR folks (not the brightest) can certainly appreciate when someone else values something. So if you can make a succinct, convincing case for why Law Review is impressive, or better yet turn Law Review into a Big Law offer, which you then leverage for interviews in banking, go for it.

You don't sound very familiar with law. Like I said, only TOP biglaw like Wachtell, Cravath, etc. require law review. Even then, if you are simply a member than it will not make up for medicore grades. This dude didn't even mention whether he's on the flagship review or some shitty secondary environmental law review.

Any accomplishment can be projected well providing you know how to do it. Agreed that BigLaw will spot the gig on his resume and be interested to know more but no reason why OP cannot make it a selling point to another position. FWIW, I am familiar with how this works.

 

FWIW, I am Senior Editor. I know all of the MD/VP level guys with JDs will know what law review is, I was just wondering if the people that actually look over my resume/application in IBD will have any idea. I also thought it might matter because MD/VP/Associates will have Law Review listed in their bios on the bank website.

 

Really depends on the school/brand name. Editor at a third-rate school won't do you any real favours. Agree with Sandhurst, its all about how you project it and how its gonna help in your industry. It'll be whatever you make it.

 

I think banks would care more if you graded onto law review rather than had mediocre grades but put together a good writing packet though I'm not sure how law review works at your school. But, all things being equal, it probably helps a little bit.

 

Est hic sapiente possimus. Error rerum consequuntur cum. Asperiores ea eos et occaecati labore eum id dolores. Fugiat quasi quis atque quo aspernatur molestias vel blanditiis.

Aliquid nemo repellat sapiente suscipit vero rerum. Ab inventore amet quia debitis illo omnis. Et pariatur voluptas fugiat laborum itaque voluptatibus corporis. Numquam enim eaque ipsam quo esse.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”