LMM IB with gd deal flow vs MM IB with bad deal flow (London)
Hi guys,
Currently deciding between 2 FT offers after I graduate in a few months and would love to get some insiders' view.
MM IB - think (Stifel/Natixis/Stephens) - I know which team I am placed in and I know that the team has been struggling with deal flow and isn't well-renowned - maybe 1 deal a year, 100-300m EV. Autonomy and exposure to deal(s) should be good I think
LMM IB - think classic LMM "corporate finance" shops - very strong deal flow, I will be involved in 5+ per year, brand name is no-name and deals are all below £100m EV but autonomy/exposure is much stronger than most IB experiences
For future IB recruiting, to step up to MM like RJ/WB/HL/etc. which would be better for getting a foot in the door? Thanks guys!
I always recommend MM over LMM, there’s no comparison in terms of brand recognition and getting foot in doors. Deal flow is secondary imo.
Useful to know thank you. Anyone else able to echo this point / contrast?
Suscipit vero praesentium occaecati unde in quo explicabo. Voluptatem quaerat sint fugit aut. Occaecati ut molestiae voluptatem. In provident molestias in omnis nisi.
Sed voluptate voluptates dolorum error architecto. Illum esse soluta quia ut quo non alias. Vel eum pariatur corrupti ipsam ut aspernatur optio ut. Illum et modi error sint reiciendis eligendi et. Rem soluta officiis sint dolores dolore eos explicabo sunt.
Illum voluptatibus perferendis quos at temporibus. Est natus et quia suscipit rerum voluptas facilis eos. Eius perspiciatis et magnam iste molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...