Need Help with Finance Questions!

Questions:

  1. What are the impacts on earnings if a company builds a new factory using debt? operating lease? capital lease? cash?
  2. When would you take a project with a negative NPV?
  3. How would you value a company without earnings, i.e., tech stocks?
  4. How do you go about determining how much products we're going to sell each year? (imagine a company like Apple)
  5. Suppose that you constructed a pro forma balance sheet for a company and the estimate for external funding required was negative. How would you interpret this result?
  6. How will a decrease in financial leverage affect a company’s cost of equity capital, if at all? How will it affect a company’s equity beta?

I am not an expert with accounting to begin with so these 2 questions are quite a problem to me, especially the second one since I thought we should only undertake projects that have a positive NPV?

Thanks

12 Comments
 

Answer #1. Debt: Earnings are not impacted by debt immediately when the purchase is made. Debt effects are seen later with interest payments which will reduce earnings by the expense(1-tax rate). Then the Depreciation from the factory later on Cash: Cash has essentially no effect on earnings whatsoever. One can argue that a company is losing the interest gained from holding cash but otherwise there is no effect. Obviously the Depreciation of the building again must be accounted for later on. Operating Lease: Operating leases act as businesses expenses so reduce earnings by the lease expense(1-tax rate) but do not include depreciation expense later on Capital Leases: The only expense for capital lease is the depreciation expense

 
U Accrete MeAnswer #1. Debt: Earnings are not impacted by debt immediately when the purchase is made. Debt effects are seen later with interest payments which will reduce earnings by the expense(1-tax rate). Then the Depreciation from the factory later on Cash: Cash has essentially no effect on earnings whatsoever. One can argue that a company is losing the interest gained from holding cash but otherwise there is no effect. Obviously the Depreciation of the building again must be accounted for later on. Operating Lease: Operating leases act as businesses expenses so reduce earnings by the lease expense(1-tax rate) but do not include depreciation expense later on Capital Leases: The only expense for capital lease is the depreciation expense

For the depreciation expense, do you also multiply them with (1-tax rate) too?

 
Best Response

Just to clarify on 1. You can't "build" a new factory with an operating lease, you could contract out the building with solid legals, then lease it back, or lease it under a head lease and then lease it on. But at no point would the factory be yours. For it to, kinda be yours, you would need to project finance it, set up an SPV, that you 100% own, and have the aforementioned lease structure. But it wouldn't be a very bankable solution unless you were a huge corporation and found a very reputable contractor (the usual structure is to have the contractor or EPC contractor have skin in the game).

Capital lease = mortgage = debt treatment

  1. multiples (e.g. EV/Sales)
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
OreosJust to clarify on 1. You can't "build" a new factory with an operating lease, you could contract out the building with solid legals, then lease it back, or lease it under a head lease and then lease it on. But at no point would the factory be yours. For it to, kinda be yours, you would need to project finance it, set up an SPV, that you 100% own, and have the aforementioned lease structure. But it wouldn't be a very bankable solution unless you were a huge corporation and found a very reputable contractor (the usual structure is to have the contractor or EPC contractor have skin in the game).

Capital lease = mortgage = debt treatment

  1. multiples (e.g. EV/Sales)

I suppose you have to use multiples. But what would be the right multiple to use? I don't think we can use multiples like EV/EBITDA or anything like that since it has no earnings

 

As a response to the updated list of Qs, this is basic stuff, read some more and all these questions will become very clear to you.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

4 and similar questions are typical market sizing problems. Do a Google search for tactics. Alteratively, get Michael Cosentino's Case in Point -- it's the de facto interview prep book for consultants but I find that financiers can get quite a bit of use from it too.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 
  1. The company is generating additional earnings that can be invested somewhere else (pay down liabilities, increase assets more, etc).
  2. A decrease in leverage will reduce a company's equity cost of capital and its beta. The company is now less risk so equity investors demand less premium.
 
Boothorbust5. The company is generating additional earnings that can be invested somewhere else (pay down liabilities, increase assets more, etc). 6. A decrease in leverage will reduce a company's equity cost of capital and its beta. The company is now less risk so equity investors demand less premium.

Hi, Boothorbust! Would you care to explain the answers more? Thank you

 

Ex mollitia qui vel nihil facilis nihil sed. Id sed modi quibusdam reiciendis dolore.

Cum et est ut molestiae. Adipisci debitis eum voluptatem occaecati. Amet incidunt autem consequuntur aut. Sunt autem facilis omnis neque explicabo doloremque.

Tempore minus delectus deleniti iusto cupiditate eligendi. Et nesciunt totam enim iusto. Incidunt placeat qui recusandae mollitia recusandae. Ad dolorem mollitia rerum non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”