Why even switch from IB to PE?

This topic has probably been discussed extensively, but I’m having trouble finding clear answers - so I figured I’d start a fresh thread.

As an IB associate earning market comp (~$200K base + $200K bonus), I’m trying to understand why so many people are eager to transition to PE - especially when most middle-market funds seem to offer all-in comp in the low $200Ks. On top of that, carry typically doesn’t kick in until VP level or higher at most funds. Am I missing something in my calculations?

Even assuming you make it to VP - does carry meaningfully boost total comp beyond what a banking VP would earn, especially since visibility into post-VP outcomes seems pretty limited? I’d also appreciate any help breaking down how carry actually factors into overall comp - it’s been tough to wrap my head around why so many are willing to make the switch when the path seems steeper and the pay potentially lower (at least early on) compared to IB.

25 Comments
 

I went A2A (EB), but most of my peers in my class went to PE after their 2 years in banking. A lot of them took a material pay cut to do so, and not a single one of them has regrets about it.

  • Pay: IB associate market is definitely not $200K + $200K anymore. That's the case at EBs, but most BBs (and thus most of the associate headcount) are meaningfully below that now. PE does offer lower pay, but many people find their professional interest in investing to be well worth that pay cut. PE has a much higher ceiling than IB for comp, and carry far outweighs IB's ceiling.
  • Career Interest: By far the biggest factor in PE over IB. All of my peers and friends who jumped over to PE enjoy their work significantly more. They find investing to be much more stimulating than being on the sell-side, and also more conducive to their career development in helping them build the skills they want out of their career. A number of them want to become operators down the line, and a buy-side role is much better towards career development than that. At the end of the day, for the most part IB is much more surface-level knowledge than PE is. In IB, you are a salesman who must know your clients and industry well enough to position your clients in the market, but you are just an advisor. In PE, you are an investor and operator and your performance is directly tied to your portcos, naturally leading to more rigorous and in-depth work.
  • WLB: Unless you start something as an entrepreneur, you will always be someone's bitch, and if you want to work in finance, your WLB will never be a 9-to-5. That being said, the resounding message I've heard is that being your senior partners' / LP's bitch is far more predictable than being your client's bitch, and people who have moved into PE have found that while hours are often similar, they still have more autonomy over their own lives.
 

Associate 2 in IB - Cov

I went A2A (EB), but most of my peers in my class went to PE after their 2 years in banking. A lot of them took a material pay cut to do so, and not a single one of them has regrets about it.

  • Pay: IB associate market is definitely not $200K + $200K anymore. That's the case at EBs, but most BBs (and thus most of the associate headcount) are meaningfully below that now. PE does offer lower pay, but many people find their professional interest in investing to be well worth that pay cut. PE has a much higher ceiling than IB for comp, and carry far outweighs IB's ceiling.
  • Career Interest: By far the biggest factor in PE over IB. All of my peers and friends who jumped over to PE enjoy their work significantly more. They find investing to be much more stimulating than being on the sell-side, and also more conducive to their career development in helping them build the skills they want out of their career. A number of them want to become operators down the line, and a buy-side role is much better towards career development than that. At the end of the day, for the most part IB is much more surface-level knowledge than PE is. In IB, you are a salesman who must know your clients and industry well enough to position your clients in the market, but you are just an advisor. In PE, you are an investor and operator and your performance is directly tied to your portcos, naturally leading to more rigorous and in-depth work.
  • WLB: Unless you start something as an entrepreneur, you will always be someone's bitch, and if you want to work in finance, your WLB will never be a 9-to-5. That being said, the resounding message I've heard is that being your senior partners' / LP's bitch is far more predictable than being your client's bitch, and people who have moved into PE have found that while hours are often similar, they still have more autonomy over their own lives.

PE is still surface level. Not really understanding company/industry dynamics. I see live on a daily basis

 
Most Helpful

I will give another perspective of someone that went IB -> PE and considering going back to IB.

  • Progression: IB is much much much much easier to progress. Out of a class of 10 Associates at a MM/UMM fund, maybe 1-2 make VP unless the fund is doubling (rare). You are also not in charge of your outcomes vs IB you are closer to revenue (vs MoM on your deals). Everyone wants to be an "investor" until COVID hits, your portcos drop 50% in revenue and now your negotiating with lenders to avoid bankruptcy. Or when you did a SW deal in '22 now looking at multiples that are 25% lower than what you paid and growth is 1/3 of what you underwrote for factors outside of your control.
  • Culture: IB is much more collegial. You are typically friends with people in your class, the people are somewhat abrasive. In PE, you are part of a fixed pie. Really no Principal, VP, Associate or even junior MD can really change the trajectory of a firm so you are competing with your coworkers in an up or out culture to get your next level up to like you / think you are the golden child of your level. Every staffing is politicalized, some mid-levels are borderline psychopaths if not sociopaths and some people will spend their days looking for ways to stick a knife in you if it improves their chance to survive.
  • Job / Day to Day: PE is much more interesting day to day. Most of the work is analytical, you are deep diving into businesses and you have resources to efficiently get the information. I thought lifestyle was better when not on deals (I was going to bed by midnight every day) and had the chance to work vs. IB was 100 hours or 50 hours with downtime and not much in between. Though working with the wrong person in PE is 2x worse than banking because you have to do the work and understand it / be able to speak to it.
  • Compensation: IB cash > PE cash but even getting 1 large carry check more than covers the difference. It does take a long time to realize but if you can find a "Partner track" seat (if that exists anymore), the total comp in PE is much better. One other thing I liked about PE is just their perks. Ski trips, random amazing restaurants, fly first class everywhere, best hotels, third-parties treat you well. 

Ultimately, I had a rough PE experience so a bit jaded and thought my banking group was awesome. I think if you are passionate about private investing, definitely go for it as you can usually go back to your banking group or find another bank and I think if you can find the right fit, PE is an awesome path. 

 

Agreed, there’s definitely more psychopaths in PE for whatever reason

 

How do you navigate your work life if you’re part of a group / industry filled with psychopaths?

Also how do you define a psychopath, like what’s the day-to-day behaviors at work?

 

Because some people don't just want to be at the beck and call of sponsors & clients all day. And you don't have the same opportunity to absorb operator-adjacent experience (and potentially step into that role yourself at some point) if all you do just run bid and capital market processes. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

What is the appeal of being an operator one day? Am I not understanding why people go thru such harsh environments such as IB —> PE … just to understand how people within businesses with far less rigorous backgrounds do their jobs? Those people clearly have more industry specific knowledge that can’t be replicated thru investing experience imo…it’s like saying the best most efficient heavy-machinery operator can easily be replaced by a math major who was shadowing him for a week…

 

I’ll give you my situation and it’s unclear if I’m better or worse off.


Through my VP years I’ve made an average of 700k pa cash comp in the last 3 years.


I have about 5m of carry at work. This is marked at about 1.6x and about 50% vested. 

About 350k should be realized this year.

Maybe another 200-300k next year

The bulk of it in 2028 ie about 4m. I would have been with the firm 8 years at this point and obviously it also depends on the 1.6x going to 2.0x.

I have decent visibility of not being fired for at least 3 years. After that it’s up or out.


You can decide how to haircut the above / compare it to banking based on timing and risk.


 

 

Kind of a dumb question, so please bear with me….
1. Did you start getting carry only as a VP?
2. If you get fired before 2028, you won’t get the remaining of the 5mm that is scheduled to be vested in 2028?
3. How hard was it to go from Assoc —> VP?

 

Assist. VP in IB-M&A

Kind of a dumb question, so please bear with me….
1. Did you start getting carry only as a VP?
2. If you get fired before 2028, you won’t get the remaining of the 5mm that is scheduled to be vested in 2028?
3. How hard was it to go from Assoc —> VP?

  1. correct
  2. The remaining of the 5m is scheduled to pay out then based on currently contemplated exits. It’s already 50% vested. So it would pay out 50% if I were fired tomorrow. There are some punitive claw back provisions but as long as you don’t punch someone on the way out you should be allowed to keep what you vest
  3. Very hard I had to switch funds
 

One other thing people forget to mention at times - how important is it for you to be working with smart people?

One thing that becomes apparent very very very quickly is how much dumber the general IB associate/VP is compared to when you join PE. PE just has smarter people in general and you get to learn from them. This can also lead to increased pressure and having to be right all the time, but it’s a great way to learn.

 

Placeat facilis necessitatibus itaque id. Nisi et odit ab ducimus aut minima illo.

Eum non excepturi qui aut quia facere. Delectus veritatis dicta ex quas assumenda reiciendis ut. Eum ipsam rerum repudiandae similique repudiandae fuga. Temporibus omnis voluptatum incidunt fuga iste voluptas. Molestiae aut aspernatur commodi excepturi. Doloribus sint impedit quas sint officiis dolorum.

Voluptas illo reprehenderit itaque sapiente temporibus quia similique. Quas tempore sunt similique quas.

 

Quibusdam deserunt ut maiores quod ut sapiente tenetur est. Nobis sed qui tenetur quae molestiae. Earum quaerat minus rerum. Eveniet sit officia quam pariatur labore ut quis.

Odio ut ex quaerat consequatur corrupti odit atque quis. Ut magni nam quo commodi eum et. Atque minima velit autem.

Sint exercitationem voluptates fuga est quod. Reiciendis velit minus quo id ducimus et quia. Praesentium aliquid odit dolores ab iste. Id rerum amet quis omnis possimus quaerat dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”