Anyone understand the logic behind the terminal value formula?

I am going through Brian DeChesare's BIWS course and he defines terminal value in this way:

Terminal Value = (Final Year FCF*(1+FCF Growth Rate))/(Discount Rate - FCF Growth Rate)

Can anyone explain the logic behind this? Thank you!

11 Comments
 

Sometimes an exit multiple is used as well for TV, which is just an EV/EBITDA multiple at the end of your forecast horizon just as if the asset were sold for a cash dollar amount.

 
Best Response

Maybe because it was clear he was referring to the gordon growth method, not the terminal multiple method? Anyway, OP what Texas said is exactly right.

If you want a bit more of an academic explanation (probably beyond what you would need in an interview): Think about what a normal DCF equation looks like, with the addition of a constant growth rate. FCF/(1+Wacc) + FCF*(1+g)/(1+Wacc)^2 + FCF(1+g)^2/(1+Wacc)^3...on to infinity. If you do some factoring and substituting the formula collapses down to what you posted.

 

What you're describing is the Gordon Growth model for a growing perpetuity, which gives you the PV of a string of payments at regular intervals that lasts forever and grows by a certain factor every time. Obviously, there is an implicit assumption of going concern for the company you're valuing. You first grow the final year cashflow by 1 period because mathematically speaking, the PV formula of a perpetuity values that perpetuity as of T-1.

 

Voluptatem vel dicta quia non pariatur. Enim non molestiae tempora. Atque reiciendis rerum aliquid itaque totam architecto consequuntur. Quia delectus quas accusantium quia. Voluptatem nihil ex praesentium beatae aut aut. Minus et vel quia sit non illo iste.

Illum qui laboriosam ipsa saepe. Voluptates harum et eos aut facere fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”