Are we actually in a recession?

I know we are "technically" in a recession based off of 2 negative gdp prints, along with gas prices decreasing for the 51st straight day due to the combination of higher interest rates and massively lower demand.

On the other hand, in July, payrolls came in at 528k vs. 258k expected as the labor force participation rate fell to 62.1..

What are peoples thoughts on this?

22 Comments
 
Most Helpful
Jim Cramer.

On the other hand, in July 528k jobs were added vs. 258k expected as the labor force participation rate fell to 62.1..

What are peoples thoughts on this?

Workforce particpation rate has declined for the last two months, so that that "job growth" is people taking on multiple jobs because things are getting that rough out there. We are definitely in a recession and those with both eyes wide open are paying attention to if this turns into a full on depression. When they have to go back and try and redefine the word recession, you know they're full of it and are trying to hide the truth.

The poster formerly known as theAudiophile. Just turned up to 11, like the stereo.
 

I don’t think you understand the labor force participation statistic.  It counts both employed people and unemployed people looking for jobs as participating in the labor force.  


So it is entirely possible for a strong jobs report to happen alongside a slight decrease in the labor force participation rate without people working extra jobs.  You could have a  lot of people getting hired but also many people retiring the same month.

 

And you're only counted in either of those categories if you're either working or unemployed and looking to be employed. If you're in the age criteria, but not looking to work or are institionalized, you're excluded. So your idea of people retiring means the potential workforce pool shrinks. And if people are continuing the "great resignation" and not wanting to work anymore, the workforce shrinks again. To grow the workforce pool and thus increase the rate it'd take new people coming of age and wanting to find a new job or say a stay at home mom wanting to get back into the office.

Also, there's the simple fact that it's measured that we added 263k multiple job holders in June. Which is almost half of that "jobs gain".

But hey, I obviously don't understand WTF I'm talking about or how to use this thing called FRED...Or we can just shrug shoulders and call it "seasonal adjustments" to make GeorgeSorosFinanceMaster feel better.

The poster formerly known as theAudiophile. Just turned up to 11, like the stereo.
 

It is a pacipatory number.  There is only one way you can have a falling LPR and a growth in the gross number of people working, otherwise you can not have an increase in the gross number of people working if you have a falling LPR.  The only way to have both is to have a population that is rising significantly faster than the LPR is dropping.  Which in America is not really the case.

 

Not even just the participation. The majority of that "job growth" is measured from the literal trough of covid when people were not allowed to go to work. Letting people go back to work isn't growth, it's mean reversion. This has been a decline fought off by the Fed's money printer and now the effects of that are starting to settle in. Buckle up. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Quod adipisci sit eum eos. Laudantium ut dolores tenetur rerum harum ut impedit quaerat. Omnis doloribus ipsam aut error qui sunt. Doloremque repudiandae ipsam porro et.

Aut ipsa dicta laboriosam voluptatem delectus suscipit ut. Molestiae repellendus qui quis qui. Et aut fuga aliquid molestias error sit nihil.

 

Laboriosam porro voluptatem asperiores magnam ut explicabo deleniti. Commodi sunt non nam quia et culpa rerum. Tempore necessitatibus ullam ut sequi et enim odio. Itaque facilis rerum porro dolorum. Dolores cum atque facilis excepturi dolorem magni eius. Quia qui enim incidunt laboriosam consequatur.

Non sint velit rerum culpa. Qui sunt in natus delectus consequatur veritatis ullam. Est culpa qui quo consequatur vel recusandae. Delectus qui voluptatem praesentium odit. Esse facere et sed voluptatibus error. Sunt vel tenetur ea minima aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”