Epstein Files

Actually insane that Mandelson was urging Epstein to get Dimon to threaten the UK chancellor over bankers’ bonus taxes. It was stupid legislation but that’s a notch below treason 

Because America is run by an evolved version of Epstein.  While Jeff was only able to appeal to the ultra rich and wealthy, Donald has conned everyone from the billionaires who gave his hooker wife a free 100 million dollar documentary to the 30k a year folks buying his bibles, sneakers, crypto coins, meme stocks etc.

I think this is partly due to the political system. In the UK a prime minister can be forced out by a simple majority vote whereas in the US it's a long drawn out process to remove a president. Also due to Trump's total lack of shame.

And three weeks after these files are released, all our WSO conservatives will be saying that actually Trump was never videotaped penetrating a small child, so obviously he's fully innocent, that actually the Epstein files only mentioned Democrats, and that the whole thing was the fault of Obama's AG for letting him plea out in the first place.  And if you mention that it was actually Bush's AG who Trump later hired (what a coincidence!) then they'll mention how actually Obama wasn't a citizen and wore a tan suit.

if this happened in France the Government would be overthrown in a week, so what does this say about the US?

I mostly lean conservative, but it's pretty clear from the files and from other places that trump is a "PDF file". We need someone new in the GOP who's going to put America and western christian civilization first. Possibly Nick Fuentes.

W CRE

O Come, All Ye Cucked.

Just kidding…your wives won’t allow you to (come). 

W call them out

PokerSlopWars

Damn where are all of the WSO Pedo Protectors? I see someone is already out here throwing anonymous monkey shit in defense of Epstein. 

Come stick up for your favorite pedo, @Corp_titan @Dr. Rahma Dikhinmahas @PrivateTechquity 🚀🚀🚀 @Isaiah_53_5 💎🙌💎🙌💎 @hedgehog9 @ojapar20 @SomeCaliberTalent @GordonGekko87 @Fjsjrjdns @iercurenc 

I want to see you boys dance. 

What I care most about is 1) Deportations and denaturalizations, and 2) election integrity (voter ID, in-person, paper only voting, etc).

Trump is wetting the bed on these two things, which leaves me not giving a shit if he gets impeached. The GOP is only good at being an opposition party, and they stand with their dick in their hands when they get power. It's radicalizing. I'm tempted to vote D these mid-terms just to clean house and make it an open field next time.

I also am no fan of his about-face on releasing the Epstein stuff. But if he achieved #1 and #2 above, I would be more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

That said, these Epstein files so far seem to be more of an indictment on foreign intelligence and the broader ruling class than anything else. Do you really think Biden would sit on damaging Trump info for 4 years, at the cost of the election? It's all of them, but the fact that we are getting some files under Trump and no files under Biden should tell you something.

Do you think the pedo defenders would put their money where their mouth is?  Would they really leave their teenaged daughter alone with Donny and Jeff?

It's been a rough week for them.  Working overtime to protect their pedo god

Yes bizarre they push this story when the Epstein files are released. Maybe not bizarre, maybe perfectly timed and pre-planned. Gotta divert the boomers' eyeballs. 

600,000 Americans paid 100$ to preorder a made in America Trump smartphone.  

The president of the United States stole 60 million dollars from his most passionate supporters and it didn't even make the news.  The corruption of this man is unfathomable.

financeabc

Do dems really care about the victims or do they want to keep this in the news to inflict damage on Trump and the republican party.  Obviously whoever was involved at this island was and or is dirt bag.  Wealthy people have the extra resources to become dirt bags.  What more can you do to Trump?  He is already been impeached and is already a convicted felon.  There is no way congress would vote to remove him from office. 

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, as the saying goes.

The fact that the Trump Administration is choosing to release the files in the manner most prejudicial to the actual victims is their business, not Democrats.  More the point, Donald Trump and the entire conservative establishment has spent over a decade campaigning on the idea that liberals are child abusers and sex predators, winning on that platform, and then using the resulting power to establish an American Waffen-SS which goes around murdering citizens (in addition to all the other corrupt, authoritarian nonsense Mr Trump stands for).  To lay quiet in the face of that is to in part validate the accusations.

Unlike Republicans, Democrats have shown some desire to hold their own accountable for being criminals or scumbags.  Continually pointing out that every person who voted for Mr Trump was supporting a man long known to be a sex predator is both ethically fair game and politically important.

The "what more can be done" is to ensure that in addition to being known as the least competent, most corrupt person to ever occupy the Oval Office, every history book written from now on also includes the fact that Mr Trump was credibly accused of being a child molestor, by himself, when he demanded that the names in the Epstein files be released.  We have posterity to think of as well.

That's a very cynical view and definitely warranted concerning the world of politics. However, we all already know that Bill Clinton is mentioned in the files, as are other, more liberal leaning, Democratic individuals such as Bill Gates. From a purely psychopathic point of view it makes sense for the party to distance itself from such persons and to push for transparency since they have less to lose. Regardless of their "true intentions" however, we must all agree that people with bad intentions can occasionally do the right thing. The Democrats are definitely on the right side of history, as are a minority of Republican lawmakers and likely the overwhelming majority of the American public, regardless of party affiliation.

Dr. Rahma Dikhinmahas

Simple question just so I understand the comments: is the claim being made that Musk and Trump are pedophiles?  

Trump, absolutely. Not even sure how you could question it after reading the files unless you're trying to make a "Well he wasn't convicted so you can't call him that" argument. As someone said, he appears in the Epstein files more often than Jesus appears in the Bible. He appears in the Epstein files more often than the word "Harry" appears in Harry Potter. And only approximately half of the files have been released. 

Elon seems more like he really tried to be one but even the worst people on Earth didn't want him around. Remember, Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 for procuring a child for prostitution. Because of this, he served prison time and was registered as a sex offender. I think it is fair to say that if any of our friends or associates were registered as child sex offenders, we wouldn't still associate with them. However, throughout 2012 and 2013, Elon kept emailing Epstein—again, a registered child sex offender—basically pleading to come hang out on Epstein's island. Hilariously, it seems that Epstein didn't want Elon around, and told Ghislaine Maxwell to basically keep brushing him off. 

I know you're not going to do this because you're incapable of good faith arguments, but you should genuinely read through the recent file release. Really unforgivable shit, and it's hardly limited to these two people that it's just easy to make fun of you and others for. 

I would argue that Mr Trump has made the claim, repeatedly, that the people named in the Epstein Files are pedophiles.  He's named.  Repeatedly.

I suppose this is another instance where you'll demand live video footage of Mr Trump sexually penetrating a minor before declaring him guilty, right?

CharlesCheese

Fascinating seeing the reactions here from those sucked into red vs. blue world.  As a dumb goy observer, I don't know which I find more interesting, the die hard maga patriots quietly lowering their "45" flags under the cover of darkness because their hero is likely a pdf, or the gentle kind hearted liberals over the moon about implied kid rape/torture/trafficking because it was more predominately perpetrated by their political opposition.

Well yeah.. the PRESIDENT of the United States being a PDF is a big fucking deal man 

I personally find it both funny and demoralizing to see that the people who were so concerned about the safety of children are now breaking their backs to somehow make their fantastical view of Trump match with the reality that he potentially fucked trafficked children (or was aware of it happening and did not give a fuck, as his previous comments clearly indicates). I can only imagine what the Republicans would have claimed if people had found out that Obama was doing any of that. They're also trying to tolerate their cognitive dissonance by turning it into a bipartisan issue, focusing on individuals likes Gates and Clinton, while at the same time their King claims it's just a Democratic Hoax (which some of them believe; no questions asked).

For the average Democrat this was a revealing experience, showing them how politics truly works and how power operates. Most of them are crushed by the realization that the world we live in is much more evil than previously thought. No "gentle kind hearted liberal" is "over the moon" about any of this. Their world view has been crushed. Most of them are much more open to what they would previously have simply ignored as "conspiratorial nonsense".

So in conclusion I suppose the core difference was that Democrats traditionally simply rejected any such conspiratorial claims, whereas Republicans traditionally either rejected them or believed in them but only under the assumptions that it was "the other side" that was at fault.

Also, are you a dumb, goy-observer? Or a dumb-goy observer? Were you describing yourself or others?

iercurenc

Hot take: having sex with a 17-year-old doesn't make you a pedophile.

There it is. Got another one. 

Where do you draw the line?

I hope you get castrated with a rusty butter knife. 

The thing is though that 18 is just a legal cutoff because people below that age are not seen as persons capable of giving informed consent.

The entire problem here is that some old, rich men and women of the political elite were grooming, manipulating, and trafficking people of any age, but also people of an age below 18, with the intent to exploit them sexually.

There are also claims of murder, organ harvesting and medical experiments.

Please try to imagine that any of this had happened to a female relative of yours (or maybe even to yourself) and then try to claim that these victims don't deserve legal protection and that the perpetrators don't deserve severe punishments.

iercurenc

The age of consent in most states is 16-17 btw.

PDF sympathizer confirmed 

This u?

iercurenc

The age of consent in most states is 16-17 btw.

Seek help 

This thread’s going to descend into another antisemitic cesspool, isn’t it? 

He definitely worked for Mossad

https://nypost.com/2026/02/04/us-news/probe-into-whether-jeffrey-epstei…