J.D. in finance?
Dear,
I was wondering if J.D. people get into business area especially finance (IB, MC, PE firms). If they do, where do they usually end up and what do they do? Is it regarded as a special, prestigious role?
I have a couple of theories for my career path and one of them is to get J.D. (instead of MBA) after a few years of IB and probably PE experience.
What do you think? Sorry my question is poorly formulated and addresses a broad range of topics. Any kinds of inputs will be very much appreciated.
JD / MBA in finance here.
Working at a MM boutique.
No doubt that it helped me get into the industry. The legal education helped me get up to speed quickly with negotiating purchase agreements (reps / warranties, indemnifications, etc.).
I don't consider it too special, but some of my co-workers might.
JD AND MBA?? Jeez.. Is that the Harvard program? How does your JD education help you personally as well? I believe JD programs in top law school have the best curriculum that pushes one's intelligence and linguistic sense, which I believe is huge!
Not to discount Johnny, he may well be HBS/HLS alumni, but a lot of programs offer this. From the very top of both business and law schools, to some super strong law but not as strong business (USC), to very weak programs you've never heard of.
Still very impressive and sounds like a huge sacrifice for usually 4 years full time. You've got to have a lot of commitment to do that.
Hi WSE - Not a Harvard program. A mid-tier, midwest school.
It does help me personally as it taught me to "think like a lawyer". The problem solving, Socratic method of teaching and rigorous work load has all been extremely beneficial throughout my career.
Johnny where did you get your joint degree at?
Hi Shrek - A mid-tier, midwest school.
I used to work in biglaw, then moved to an EB in an investment banking role.
I tend to find that legal know-how is very helpful in finance, because the answers to complex technical questions are often found in a transaction contract or law. Most investment bankers frankly feel less comfortable navigating the contracts that govern their transactions than they should. Working in law will help you feel confident with efficiently tackling 100+page documents to find answers.
All that said I think a whole law degree is a bit overkill. Contract law is pretty easy imo and more a matter of knowing what's market than what some professor has to say.
No doubt the whole JD course made you a more intelligent person as well. I'm guestimating that you're from T14, which would have cost you lots of money in addition to the pile of debt out of undergrad. Do you feel it is all worth the time and money overall (personally and career wise)
As someone who has a lot of friends who went to top law schools...I doubt this.
Completely agree with your second paragraph, Fugue.
JD is incredibly useful in RE development and RE private equity. Development code, development agreements, and joint-venture agreements are complex documents that often require attorney clarification/opinion. The ability to self-perform complex legal analysis would be a big asset in the space.
JD here. I practiced law a couple years, then got the MBA and went to IB and then buy side. While many people tell me the JD makes me unique, I don't buy it. I don't think it's added much value at all and if I could do it again, I'd definitely skip it.
People seem to love the idea of the law as this broadly applicable skill, but I actually think it's about as narrow of a skill set as you can find. I first realized this when I was working on deals as a lawyer and saw that the bankers knew so much more about my job than I knew about theirs. They had a better understanding of WTF is actually going on in the deal, and if they had to fill in to do my job they could've done it. Lawyers on the other hand don't know anything about the finance/economics of a deal. I don't like to sound harsh and say that they're just scribes, but honestly that's often the case.
Now, as someone who's been out of law a while, all I see in lawyers is people who are getting in the way and trying to create fake issues to protect their own relevance. 99% of them are masters in the art of pissing on your head and telling you it's raining so they can sell you an umbrella. I think people are slowly realizing just how commoditized a lot of the advice is, and it's going to become increasingly hard for a good lawyer to differentiate himself.
I don't think the skill set translates well to finance at all, and even if it did it would just be a more slow and expensive way to get there.
Agree on this. I think a lot of legal work will get more and more comoditized in the near future.
You can say the same thing about banking, investing, medicine, etc. Everything is being commdoditized...
This is exactly correct. If I had to do it over again I would have tried to network my way into an analyst position at a bank right after college in 2003. Instead I went to law school and while I've practiced in biglaw, it's the investment pros that know way more than the lawyers. Sure we can read docs, but they do everything else.
First reading this, I thought you wanted to get a JD degree that specialized in finance
Right, I should have been more clear about the question. I meant the JD degree's utility in the finance domain in terms of career wise.
No worries it was funny
JDs are useful in real estate. Hardly required, as you still pay an attorney either way, but it can come in handy from a knowledge standpoint. That's not a reason to go get one by any stretch though.
I think working for (many / most) investment banks requires very little esoteric thought. Mostly, bankers are a cost center (in the grander scheme of the economic ecosystem) that connect experts (on the industry side) with experts (on the intelligence side: legal, data research, political advisory, economic advisory, etc...). This requires very little domain knowledge / intellectual curiosity, but a niche appreciation for schmoozing clients and finessing unoriginal ideas (i.e. what the junior staff put together with help from someone within the firm's expert network).
Some of the smartest people I know have JD's. The program develops an insatiable desire for reading and learning for those that are lucky enough to be intellectually curious. On the other side of the coin, there is a crowd that emerges from that environment feeling jaded about introspective thinking and thinking for themselves. All power to them, but I think it's statistically safe to say they are the sheep that obediently herd into banking / corporate law.
If you get excited reading about how anthropology shaped government and economic structure / read Dostoyevsky at the beach without it being for the sake of impressing well pedigreed women in small bikinis, consider taking this route and go to a hedge fund. If you're not the type to research what they consume (in the sense of food and knowledge), take the job that gives you comfort and a seamless budget. You may have to start at banking, but don't be discouraged when the 40-going-on-70 MD hiding his vices behind a tailored suit gives you shit for not marching in order.
On that note, naval special forces don't march. They train for efficiency and execute with precision when complex problems require high caliber skills.
My question is... why? I never understand this. Why not just build up work experience and then get into a top 15 MBA program. If you can land at a T15 MBA you can 100% break into IB.
JD/MBA here. It is not transferrable to finance at all. Sure, the way you think about problems might help you slightly. But if you are smart enough to get into a top law school, you dont need the education to prep you for finance. However, if you couldn't break into finance before, I would recommend just doing the MBA instead of the JD.
If you want to do the program, do it for something that is super specific, like finance for a tech startup, or vc/ge. For example, I used the law experience to help me start my own company. My other friend specialized in IP law and it helped him land a role with a sick venture capital spot (finance background before law). Another person is now head of finance in a growth startup.
Quia delectus sit sed quia. Sapiente quasi consequatur dignissimos recusandae eum.
Beatae et ut quia ut aut hic. Quas aut commodi aspernatur a ab commodi est velit. Enim cumque veritatis quia rerum voluptatum in aut. Fugit eum quod et iste ducimus labore quas. Eos perferendis sapiente quia id. Corrupti optio qui iste perspiciatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Eum in nisi tenetur at reiciendis. Recusandae perferendis rem impedit voluptatibus id vel. Id at saepe cum assumenda. Commodi autem nihil esse ipsa. Rerum voluptatem eligendi voluptatem eos.
Veritatis error sit quaerat occaecati. Aspernatur dignissimos id sed saepe. Repudiandae sit doloribus qui reiciendis nam. Commodi esse suscipit porro quia eum est. Eum voluptas soluta sint laudantium earum.
Suscipit quod sint error voluptas cupiditate quis. Qui asperiores eum perferendis eum eum quia molestias. Dolorem sed et facere fuga ut enim. Perspiciatis nisi tenetur est ullam.
Quo aut doloribus cumque expedita. Quia tempora ea quasi id quia vel possimus. Et dolor fuga aliquid debitis libero quia. Quis fugit maiores quia quia. Et ratione dolorem non quisquam expedita.