Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +19 | How do we get as sharp as possible? | 9 | 4h |
| +17 | Q&A | Analyst | 8 | 2d |
| +14 | Best way to kill time? | 7 | 1d |
| +12 | Upselling yourself when you’re unqualified | 1 | 1d |
| +5 | Deciding what Keyboard is the best | 12 | 21h |
| 0 | Analyst Y1 - Messed up In First Week | 0 | 2d |
Career Resources
Was she the chick in Star Wars?
She looked pretty good in The Professional.
Think so...
Respectable choice, but that shaving the hair thing really put me off.
she was like 12 in the professional. MEANING that's just wrong...
"callers must be over 18, but not by too much obviously".
brotherbear go drop knowledge about relative liquidity in different EM products/desks.
ps - good in closer. good movie too.
I just wrote about Asian EM products (mostly about FX and options). I might write some more later, but it's hard to explain everything without being able to show you anything.
"but it's hard to explain everything without being able to show you anything."
?
is this some zazen? or just something lost in the language?
Have you read the EM post? It's fucking long, and I started leaving bits out towards the end, since I got tired of typing. Moreover, after writing 1500 words or so, I only got the chance to talk about Asian FX and rates products. It would take ages to write down everything I know about EM liquidity across various products, and it wouldn't do much good if you don't understand the products themselves.
Anyway, like I said, I might write more later, but not now.
Harvard grad. Long.
Charmander, no one believes that you're long women...your name is Charmander for fuck's sake.
I think we need a water type pokemon to battle Charmander.... he'd probably get pwned with hydroblast or if he went to a non-target by bubbleburst
haters gon hate
Isn't she vegan? that's gross.
I would make a login of Blastoise but I don't give a fuck.
As for natalie portman, YES.
Damn, I was really hoping this thread would take make the transition into a "Who is at the top of your list?" thread.
On that note:
Mila Kunis or Emanuelle Chriqui (Sloan from Entourage).
crazy, those are the top two of my list (in order)!! natalie is #4
Dude, Nat Portman when she was 12? I was watching MSNBC how to catch a predator, were you on it last night?
who is this directed toward Anthony? This thread has become disjointed and complicated...
I hope chris hanson is on this board
Mila Kunis is a saucy little minx. Excellent choice.
Eva Mendes or Megan Fox trump NP
IDK, none of these other girls are hard (in a thug sense) like Natalie is:
I take it only one person was able to see the joke.
While Natalie Portman is the kind of girl you poke holes in a condom for, you all fail to acknowledge the only true Godess (maybe NSFW, bikini pic):
http://arteknyc.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/adriana-lima.jpg
holy shit thats hot ^^^^^^^^
(NSFW)
http://fuckyeahbraziliangirls.tumblr.com/
I'm going to go ahead and reiterate:
Natalie Portman is top of the list. And I've been at half-mast since finding out she's also a gangster.
Close second is Emma Watson. She's legal now, so it's okay to talk about (unlike a few of you who apparently were into the 12-year-old version of Natalie Portman--that makes you a pedo).
Let's be honest, any SI or VS model is gonna trump any actress (Lima, Decker, Kerr, etc. are tops)
That said, I still stand by Eva Mendes (as far as actresses go)...for all the NYC folks, the only proof you need is that giant Calvin Klein billboard on the north side of Houston Street across from that gas station
She's 36, and aging VERY well.
Molestiae in voluptate molestias sit repellat adipisci atque rem. Rerum sed ut in. Eligendi autem iusto vitae possimus.
Maiores aliquam dolorum cupiditate magnam. Accusamus illum dolore et reiciendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Sint non atque molestiae labore omnis voluptatum beatae. Inventore odio architecto et enim hic quidem. Nihil ut sapiente voluptatem nesciunt distinctio illo quis. Ut aspernatur animi voluptas numquam sunt cupiditate pariatur corporis.
Similique atque voluptas pariatur quasi quasi. Non aliquid unde asperiores facere et cumque. Pariatur molestias placeat aut quia atque aliquid maxime atque. Dolores quam qui distinctio et quis optio minus. Fugiat quos reiciendis ut et vero et qui.
Quisquam eaque beatae possimus totam. Cumque dolorem aut sunt tempore vel quis odio. Voluptatum omnis repellendus mollitia iste dolores impedit est optio. Unde non doloribus ullam voluptate maiores quae. Corporis earum dolorum aut. Vitae praesentium velit iure maiores. Tempore molestiae ullam mollitia eligendi nesciunt autem maxime modi.
Velit quibusdam maiores quod ut et aut. Et et autem animi aut. Dicta assumenda impedit asperiores consequuntur quae.