Popular Votes and Electoral votes

Hey,

As u know the 2012 US presidential election just ended. I am new to this thing plus i am a foreigner so i have a little doubt.

Based on who gets 270+ electoral college votes the presidency is decided.

Thats OK. But why the national popular vote??

Please can anyone explain to me the significance of the popular vote. Romney won the popular vote but still lost on electoral votes.

Thoughts please?

 

Ok that was a mistake but whats the use of popular vote???

If you ain't gettin money dat mean you done somethin wrong. " If you have built castles in the air , your work need not be lost; that is where they should be . Now put the foundations under them." - Henry David Thoreau
 
Hank Rearden:
Ok that was a mistake but whats the use of popular vote???

Well there is no real use of the popular vote, but the popular vote drives electoral college results. Only 4 times in history has a candidate lost the popular vote but still been elected President, and only once in the last 120 years (Gore/Bush 2000). Without a legitimate third party candidate, it is nearly impossible for it to break in such a way.

MM IB -> Corporate Development -> Strategic Finance
 

Each state electorates are given out based on the popular vote in that state. So, theoretically (and it's happened before), you can lose the popular vote but win the electoral college. People just continue to track the national popular vote because it's essentially a symbol of democracy. It makes people feel good. But it only actually matters at each individual state level for presidential elections.

 
AllDay_028:
Each state electorates are given out based on the popular vote in that state. So, theoretically (and it's happened before), you can lose the popular vote but win the electoral college. People just continue to track the national popular vote because it's essentially a symbol of democracy. It makes people feel good. But it only actually matters at each individual state level for presidential elections.

Ok so thats the deal. Thanks for explaining man.

If you ain't gettin money dat mean you done somethin wrong. " If you have built castles in the air , your work need not be lost; that is where they should be . Now put the foundations under them." - Henry David Thoreau
 
AndyLouis:
anyone for changing it so that the candidate is chosen by the popular vote?

+1 wouldn't mind that at all

"Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?"
 
AndyLouis:
anyone for changing it so that the candidate is chosen by the popular vote?

The argument against this is that smaller states would be overlooked...but they should be of little importance. If 1% of the country lives in Iowa, Iowa should get 1% of the vote. It makes very little sense that Ohio decides the fate of the country year after year.

We also get some pretty odd campaign priorities due to the electoral college. Candidates have to pander to a largely uneducated manufacturing population in a lot of swing states. If they focused campaigns on the Bos-Wash corridor and West Coast, I think we would see very different platforms.

 

I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

 
BTbanker:
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Haha, what? You want to eliminate a party just because you don't like it? If those conservatives chose to vote 3rd party instead of Romney, their choice has to be respected - otherwise what kind of democracy is this?

 
Frabjous:
BTbanker:
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Haha, what? You want to eliminate a party just because you don't like it? If those conservatives chose to vote 3rd party instead of Romney, their choice has to be respected - otherwise what kind of democracy is this?

Not only am I conservative/libertarian, I'm also a realist. Never in the history of this country will there ever be a President who is that far right or left. I just won't happen. Either choose the lesser of two evils, or join the other 180MM+ people who didn't vote this year. Just my .02

 
BTbanker:
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Do you know the difference between a Libertarian and a "conservative"?

 
txjustin:
BTbanker:
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Do you know the difference between a Libertarian and a "conservative"?

You are missing the fucking point. A socialist has no choice but to vote for Obama, since he's the closest to his party. A libertarian will either waste his vote on Johnson, or pick the lesser of two evils. If you believe in no government intervention, voting for Johnson OR not voting at all = guaranteeing Obama a second term, which will piss you off more so than if Romney were president. I don't know how your mind cannot grasp this concept.
 

You don't want a popular vote. The electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.

 
TNA:
The electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.
Do you think the electoral college would be ready to defy the voters if it happened? I mean, since a lot of people (~60 million) would have voted for Hitler Jr, wouldn't the electoral college just go with it? Your point is clearly valid, at least as long as we believe the electoral college would indeed exercise this control.
 
Kejsaren:
TNA:
The electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.
Do you think the electoral college would be ready to defy the voters if it happened? I mean, since a lot of people (~60 million) would have voted for Hitler Jr, wouldn't the electoral college just go with it? Your point is clearly valid, at least as long as we believe the electoral college would indeed exercise this control.

Yeah, I think they would go against it, as they should. Pure populism is a receipt for disaster.

This country has a 7th grade reading level and 70% with a high school degree or worse. The morons do enough damage with a Republican form of government, let alone a purely Democratic form.

 
moneymogul:
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Or everybody should just realize that this two-party system is trash...

A multi party system isn't much better man. Both parties converge in the center. If you have these splinter groups you will have even more extremism.

 

I will do anything to stop hearing about Ohio and Florida every four years. Seriously, any one gives crap about any of those two states other than presidential elections? (ok. with florida, you have south beach).

 

Facilis ad eos adipisci molestiae vel esse placeat. Repellat facilis eius sit possimus aperiam quo eum. Odit dicta eos eum et itaque. Sed at et qui earum commodi aspernatur.

Omnis ut aperiam velit reiciendis hic. Esse unde sunt id eos enim.

Ut nam unde sint vero dolores voluptatum. Ratione voluptates fugiat voluptatum rerum id non ullam. Repudiandae sit corrupti voluptatem in aspernatur qui.

 
Best Response

Provident veniam facilis suscipit. Neque nulla ullam temporibus inventore. Et accusantium nam sit velit est suscipit officiis. Odit quidem nihil eaque suscipit iste ut. Distinctio ullam veritatis sint explicabo vitae. Eum quibusdam hic veniam dolorem. Excepturi possimus nesciunt fugit quas.

Ullam sed voluptatum vero. Ut voluptas est tempora voluptate enim rerum. Sed cum saepe odio voluptatem molestiae.

Aperiam ut vel voluptate sit suscipit. Ex rerum vero qui illo. Ducimus modi dignissimos voluptas dolore rerum. Autem molestiae quis debitis ut aliquid saepe repellendus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”