Popular Votes and Electoral votes

Hey,

As u know the 2012 US presidential election just ended. I am new to this thing plus i am a foreigner so i have a little doubt.

Based on who gets 270+ electoral college votes the presidency is decided.

Thats OK. But why the national popular vote??

Please can anyone explain to me the significance of the popular vote. Romney won the popular vote but still lost on electoral votes.

Thoughts please?

31 Comments
 

Ok that was a mistake but whats the use of popular vote???

If you ain't gettin money dat mean you done somethin wrong. " If you have built castles in the air , your work need not be lost; that is where they should be . Now put the foundations under them." - Henry David Thoreau
 
Hank ReardenOk that was a mistake but whats the use of popular vote???

Well there is no real use of the popular vote, but the popular vote drives electoral college results. Only 4 times in history has a candidate lost the popular vote but still been elected President, and only once in the last 120 years (Gore/Bush 2000). Without a legitimate third party candidate, it is nearly impossible for it to break in such a way.

MM IB -> Corporate Development -> Strategic Finance
 

Each state electorates are given out based on the popular vote in that state. So, theoretically (and it's happened before), you can lose the popular vote but win the electoral college. People just continue to track the national popular vote because it's essentially a symbol of democracy. It makes people feel good. But it only actually matters at each individual state level for presidential elections.

 
AllDay_028Each state electorates are given out based on the popular vote in that state. So, theoretically (and it's happened before), you can lose the popular vote but win the electoral college. People just continue to track the national popular vote because it's essentially a symbol of democracy. It makes people feel good. But it only actually matters at each individual state level for presidential elections.

Ok so thats the deal. Thanks for explaining man.

If you ain't gettin money dat mean you done somethin wrong. " If you have built castles in the air , your work need not be lost; that is where they should be . Now put the foundations under them." - Henry David Thoreau
 
AndyLouisanyone for changing it so that the candidate is chosen by the popular vote?

+1 wouldn't mind that at all

"Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?"
 
AndyLouisanyone for changing it so that the candidate is chosen by the popular vote?

The argument against this is that smaller states would be overlooked...but they should be of little importance. If 1% of the country lives in Iowa, Iowa should get 1% of the vote. It makes very little sense that Ohio decides the fate of the country year after year.

We also get some pretty odd campaign priorities due to the electoral college. Candidates have to pander to a largely uneducated manufacturing population in a lot of swing states. If they focused campaigns on the Bos-Wash corridor and West Coast, I think we would see very different platforms.

 

I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

 
BTbankerI honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Haha, what? You want to eliminate a party just because you don't like it? If those conservatives chose to vote 3rd party instead of Romney, their choice has to be respected - otherwise what kind of democracy is this?

 
Frabjous
BTbankerI honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Haha, what? You want to eliminate a party just because you don't like it? If those conservatives chose to vote 3rd party instead of Romney, their choice has to be respected - otherwise what kind of democracy is this?

Not only am I conservative/libertarian, I'm also a realist. Never in the history of this country will there ever be a President who is that far right or left. I just won't happen. Either choose the lesser of two evils, or join the other 180MM+ people who didn't vote this year. Just my .02

 
BTbankerI honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Do you know the difference between a Libertarian and a "conservative"?

 
txjustin
BTbankerI honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Do you know the difference between a Libertarian and a "conservative"?

You are missing the fucking point. A socialist has no choice but to vote for Obama, since he's the closest to his party. A libertarian will either waste his vote on Johnson, or pick the lesser of two evils. If you believe in no government intervention, voting for Johnson OR not voting at all = guaranteeing Obama a second term, which will piss you off more so than if Romney were president. I don't know how your mind cannot grasp this concept.
 

You don't want a popular vote. The electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.

 
TNAThe electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.
Do you think the electoral college would be ready to defy the voters if it happened? I mean, since a lot of people (~60 million) would have voted for Hitler Jr, wouldn't the electoral college just go with it? Your point is clearly valid, at least as long as we believe the electoral college would indeed exercise this control.
 
Kejsaren
TNAThe electoral college could in theory defy the voters. So suppose the economy takes a shit and Hitler Jr. ran for president. People elect him and the electoral college could not vote for him. Check and Balance.
Do you think the electoral college would be ready to defy the voters if it happened? I mean, since a lot of people (~60 million) would have voted for Hitler Jr, wouldn't the electoral college just go with it? Your point is clearly valid, at least as long as we believe the electoral college would indeed exercise this control.

Yeah, I think they would go against it, as they should. Pure populism is a receipt for disaster.

This country has a 7th grade reading level and 70% with a high school degree or worse. The morons do enough damage with a Republican form of government, let alone a purely Democratic form.

 
moneymogul
I honestly think they should take the Libertarian off the ballot. Essentially, they are conservatives trying to make a statement, and are wasting their vote. Obama got 50%, Romney got 48%, which means Johnson got 2% of wasted votes. The system is inherently flawed.

Or everybody should just realize that this two-party system is trash...

A multi party system isn't much better man. Both parties converge in the center. If you have these splinter groups you will have even more extremism.

 

I will do anything to stop hearing about Ohio and Florida every four years. Seriously, any one gives crap about any of those two states other than presidential elections? (ok. with florida, you have south beach).

 

Dolorem quia et est voluptatibus. Dolor culpa itaque quibusdam dolorem. Unde aut dolorem architecto voluptatum. Ipsam iure velit sed qui.

Omnis explicabo ratione est ut. Facilis modi nam sit. Non id consectetur quaerat ducimus et molestiae numquam. Praesentium aliquid quos voluptatem iste. Rerum sit aliquid voluptatem repudiandae nobis voluptas eos. Odit qui ducimus quia rerum aut mollitia. Dolorem voluptatibus nihil amet qui doloremque minima numquam reprehenderit.

Facere consequatur illum hic id quia eum. Porro alias est porro sit commodi. Sit sed sit minus quia sunt architecto.

 
Best Response

Debitis possimus dolorum excepturi voluptatum voluptates eum. Sint aut excepturi earum et eveniet maiores. Velit odit distinctio non ad nihil rerum aperiam odit. Provident nihil officia aut dicta. Quaerat est ex omnis ut sed quae fugit. Repellendus quia exercitationem velit maiores voluptate suscipit in. Cumque dolore quia tenetur voluptatum.

Omnis libero qui iste voluptas eius. Animi et quaerat ut. Reiciendis in et suscipit consequatur magnam. Perspiciatis distinctio temporibus in laboriosam libero mollitia dolorum. Itaque animi in voluptatem ipsa dolorem tempora repellendus. Aliquid voluptatem provident hic hic cumque alias nihil. Cupiditate dolor voluptatem possimus saepe.

Minima soluta odit reiciendis saepe ratione ad similique et. Necessitatibus commodi sint earum ipsa est iusto illo tempora. Enim est enim ut ab velit iure incidunt cum.

Dolores possimus accusamus iure vitae provident. Error accusantium quibusdam debitis et alias molestiae qui. Nihil est mollitia magni aut aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”