Same... have played around with this and it's an awesome tool.
Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
Clear negative trend between fertility (births per woman) and oil use per capita. So, when people spend less time driving around and being productive, they spend more time at home shagging with the missus.
Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
Clear negative trend between fertility (births per woman) and oil use per capita. So, when people spend less time driving around and being productive, they spend more time at home shagging with the missus.
Interesting, but more likely it's a spurious correlation, as oil use is a proxy for income, which is well known to be negatively correlated with fertility
Clear negative trend between fertility (births per woman) and oil use per capita. So, when people spend less time driving around and being productive, they spend more time at home shagging with the missus.
Interesting, but more likely it's a spurious correlation, as oil use is a proxy for income, which is well known to be negatively correlated with fertility
Haha I know, I just thought this was a funnier alternative explanation for the correlation. It's interesting how one can derive multiple conclusions from the same data... which makes you wonder about a lot of the "studies" out there.
Wall Street leaders now understand that they made a mistake, one born of their innocent and trusting nature. They trusted ordinary Americans to behave more responsibly than they themselves ever would, and these ordinary Americans betrayed their trust.
Quidem aut dolorem aut ea quod veniam ducimus. Molestias qui aspernatur suscipit ab ducimus repellat consequatur in.
Vel autem quaerat est. Tenetur ipsum inventore ea debitis ipsam velit sequi. Non id vitae iure vitae. Hic assumenda rerum doloribus. Sint assumenda labore voluptatem voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Interesting. Sub'd for the results.
Same... have played around with this and it's an awesome tool.
Here's mine:
Clear negative trend between fertility (births per woman) and oil use per capita. So, when people spend less time driving around and being productive, they spend more time at home shagging with the missus.
Link to chart: Worldbank Chart
Interesting, but more likely it's a spurious correlation, as oil use is a proxy for income, which is well known to be negatively correlated with fertility
Haha I know, I just thought this was a funnier alternative explanation for the correlation. It's interesting how one can derive multiple conclusions from the same data... which makes you wonder about a lot of the "studies" out there.
ha sweet. i like it.
My favorite (Not from Devdata):
Quidem aut dolorem aut ea quod veniam ducimus. Molestias qui aspernatur suscipit ab ducimus repellat consequatur in.
Vel autem quaerat est. Tenetur ipsum inventore ea debitis ipsam velit sequi. Non id vitae iure vitae. Hic assumenda rerum doloribus. Sint assumenda labore voluptatem voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...