Tech bros are inferior

Ranking High Finance vs Tech, categorically

Compensation - Finance
Prestige - Finance
Client exposure - Finance
Career development - Finance
Women - Finance
Culture - Finance

Also by high finance I am exclusively referring to tier 1 finance jobs, meaning IB/PE/HF. Some tech jobs are probably better than corpfin or AM.

75 Comments
 

Corp fin gets a bad rep on here, but to be honest it’s an easy gig most of the time, you learn a lot about the workings of successful financial operations, the work life balance is better than IB and on a per hour basis, the hourly wage is close to IB if not the same hourly wage.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

If you’re talking corp fin vs IB, I don’t exactly agree. I was at a big company so my managers managers manager etc in corp fin was the CFO making 8 figures and dude had a Booth MBA

There is a ladder to climb and if you’re good at managing in corp fin, it can be more lucrative in large companies than IB.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Worked a Corp fi job last summer, work-life was great but that was about all I found it had that was appealing. Lots of people seemed bored asf or just going through the motions. Sure, if you care about the “mission” or love optimizing financial efficiency for a small division you’d probably enjoy it. Probably more motivating to work in the medical industry that I was in, as you are “improving peoples’ health”.

IB seems more challenging, fast-paced, and offers much more personal growth opportunity. Comp/hr is usually higher on average too, but greatly outpaces corp fi opportunities 3-5 years out of the gate.

TLDR: Corp fi is only better if you don’t give a shit

 

I wholeheartedly disagree with this. It appears you’re a lazy ass working on small projects. And you only worked for a summer? Sounds pretty weak. Get some ambition and start giving a shit about producing good quality work.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

WLB is obviously the elephant in the room here.  Even 50 hour weeks mean two hours less of free time or sleep every single day.

 

Yep. Know how it's a cope thread?

You will never see a tech bro or tech board compare themselves to finance professionals.

Feel like that level of career insecurity is reserved solely for finance and legal professionals. Doctors, programmers, engineers, etc. dont give a shit

 
Most Helpful

Can we take into account how socially awkward and unattractive people in tech are?

I know very few tech people who aren’t absolute spergs or physically looking goblins.

Source: did CS and Business, chose business because people were more normal

Array
 

Where do you work? I’ve worked with mostly normal people in tech. There’s some weirdos, but overall it seems like a pretty standard deviation curve. You get some really cool people, mostly just normal people, and some real weird people. 

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 

This is mostly in the engineering function to be fair - and not all engineers. Most other people in other functions are relatively normal (apart from raging socialists and the like). 

Was obsessed with finance, now do product in tech
 

Compensation - Both are relatively on par, there’s more terminal options around the $200-400k options in tech but those $600k+ jobs are definitely out there. Even some breaking 7 figures, but obviously really rare. 

Prestige - lol why is this important?


Client exposure - Finance (definitely true)


Career development - Both offer great opportunities for growth


Women - My wife is a SWE but she got into it after me, no this is a no op for me personally 


Culture - Finance (I’ll concede on this. I’m happy where I work, but it’s known some companies are pretty crazy on the ultra PC culture) 

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 

Prestige is still important because despite earning a lot of money, coder = nerd is still in the minds of many people.

 

In what context does prestige play a role? This is an honest question to understand. Prestige matters, no doubt. But to me, it matters in terms of earning money and raising money. 
 

So ex-FAANG ex-Hedge Fund Quant or Stanford/ MIT/ Berkeley alum in tech means you get paid more and can raise money a bit more easily (at least get the meeting more easily anyway). Obviously finance has the equivalent (BB, EB, MBB, HYP, etc). But outside of the two goals of earning more and raising money- why does prestige matter?

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
 

Based and redpilled, too many techbros think they're kings of the world making 300k in SF where rent is like 80k/year. Also they get no women and SF has ugly ass women. Finance culture is elite (basically a frat house) as opposed to tech (basically a math club meeting).

Also AM is interesting as fuck

 

Lol I see the prestigious PE guys suck on the D with likes of Zuckerberg, Musk or even a Sillicon Valley startup, Whoring their way in with a blank cheque and a big bank name. For a moment just separate yourself with your firm's name and ask yourself if you're good for anything? Their goes your prestige down the wall street drain. You're not your company. Calm your tts.

 

Hahahahah I am gonna create an NFT out of it. wait nvm nobody gives a fuck about what you just wrote! They are tech bros, facebook is a Tech company (a tech based ad platform). It's listed on NASDAQ? Does that ring a bell? Anyway I guess changing fonts on M&A decks have killed some of your neurons.

 

We are comparing jobs you imbecile. Mark is not coding in his moms basement like you are, he is a decision maker and operator. Have fun typing in numbers on a screen and getting zero exposure to clients

 

Tech bros don't just write code but build products, scale them to trillion dollar companies like Apple, Google. There are probably a 100 more FAANGs brewing in a basement while you read your morning byte of market and taking a laxative supported dump.

 

So that was about PE. Let's not forget how the HF gigolos were on their knees a few month ago for the short squeeze from Reddit/Robinhood apes. Tech platforms bursting wall street balls!

 

When was the last time PE/HF prestigious drains made a small blip on the Tech bros? Anyway I rest my case. Intellect in this argument is sub-par for a tech bro. Go back to changing fonts buddy. I hope each of you have the balls to carry this attitude while reaching out to a tech bro with your worthless pile of cash. Don't wiggle that tail b/w your balls 🤣

 

You just proved you don’t know shit. You’re conflating IB with PE/VC which are on the complete opposite side of a deal. I feel bad for you, to be honest. You’re literally back office, you don’t even generate revenue or interact with clients. You literally are in a support role for the people who generate revenue

 

Lol this was the cope I was looking for. Broke personal trainers/yoga instructors get way more ass in a week than a finance bro will get in his whole entire analyst stint. Hope of the copium will ya?

 

What is even the point of contemplating this? Like whatever you do, just be a good person regardless of potential comp differences - no one at all but you will care.

 

But I thought tech has more ultra billionaires than any other industry, including finance?

It's almost impossible to achieve billionaire status in finance there days; the ones that exist predominantly made their money between 1985-2007, the so-called "golden era". Even if you can make it big in finance, we're talking $1-10 billion, at most.

Compare that with Musk, Zuckerberg, Gates, etc. who are each worth $110 billion+ and started their companies as coders at first and at heart. New billionaires in tech are being minted constantly (and IPOs are just for liquidity btw). 

The economics of tech is just too lucrative because of the scaleability and margins. This naturally trickles down to even low-level and entry-level jobs. In finance, dinner is expensed because you're still technically on the clock (techbros are long done by then).

When my friend was an intern at Google 10+ years ago, the company not only served free gourmet lunch to employees daily, but also paid for his rent in Mountain View, CA. He earned $10K a month for 3 months (way more than any other internship, and when some internships were still unpaid), and Google's HQ campus is pretty decked out. The earliest you ever have to be at work is 9am and the day is effectively over by 2-3pm with a 2 hour lunch in between. 

Upon college graduation (from a top state school for C/S), that same friend turned down an offer from Facebook going instead for Airbnb due to pre-IPO stock. Even if the the IPO didn't pan out (which it did), his base alone was $150K starting and Airbnb was a VERY well funded startup when my friend joined. Today he is a millionaire, has been for a few years now, and he's only 31/32.

All this is unheard of in finance, and it does make me a little jealous, but at least finance is a close second. But if you think that only SWE in tech have big money potential, then you should look at comp of software sales. 

Even after all that, many (but not all) tech companies are still cash cows with massive barriers to entry and barely any regulations. 

 

We’re talking about careers, such as being in IB vs software engineering. Starting a business and scaling it to be the biggest in the world is closer to finance anyway

 

No..."starting a business and scaling it to be the biggest in the world" is not closer to finance, that's called entrepreneurship. 

My point is that tech entrepreneurship has exponentially more upside than finance entrepreneurship does. Did you even read my last post? Technology can be so profitable, that there's often plenty of money to go around even for the "little people" (as compared to the little people in finance). 

Don't know about these days, but reason people used to like tech entrepreneurship was because it was common to have humble/underdog beginnings (e.g. some dude in his parents' garage/basement bootstrapping the whole thing while eating ramen). Often money was the not primary motive.

How long can you go without the security of a cushy job and steady paycheck before you get a severe case of diarrhea from the stress/anxiety? Entrepreneurship isn't for everybody (and quite frankly, it's not for most people).

Numbers don't lie and finance is not the one. Sorry to burst your bubble. 

 

All in all, I’d say tech is better because of the WLB factor… but it’s close.

Comp - about the same in “high finance” vs FAANG all things considered, but need to work much harder for it in finance

People - Finance people are more normal/cool/attractive, lots of unattractive and socially awkward people in tech. If this doesn’t matter to you, great.

Work - depends on what you like. I couldn’t stand coding and if I had to choose something it would be finance, but different strokes for different folks.

WLB - this is what takes the cake for tech. Work 4 hours per day and make 200-300k after a few years. You can do this in finance/PE too but it’s a grind.

Overall seems like tech is going through a golden age now the way finance did in the 1980s, but it will probably pull back in the coming years. Lots of FOMO out there and people throwing money at garbage companies. But for now, it’s easy to rake in funding, even with a crap business, if you know how to code.

 

Nulla omnis veritatis laboriosam debitis iure. Eius non vitae minus dicta consequatur. Eum repellendus rerum ea dolor ut architecto. Ut ab magni accusamus.

Praesentium eaque nam aut dolor qui. Vel aliquid incidunt est assumenda. Et quaerat sapiente dolorum nesciunt fugit molestias repellat. Repellat quidem omnis quia rerum molestiae dicta est.

Numquam odio non quas numquam consequatur. Dolor ipsam vitae dolor eligendi cum delectus nemo. Nam qui autem eum est.

Quo sit praesentium quibusdam est consequatur voluptatem. Debitis praesentium aut a. Rem ut sit necessitatibus. Consequuntur laboriosam assumenda quos itaque. Deleniti omnis nam neque veritatis molestiae eum itaque. Omnis qui eos similique velit.

 

Porro autem cum vel temporibus animi natus. Necessitatibus aut voluptatem quos voluptas magnam. Dolores aut atque adipisci maiores. Facilis eius quibusdam dolor id quibusdam et nemo. Maxime laboriosam molestias dolorem quia corrupti odio laboriosam aut.

Voluptatem hic omnis rerum aut corrupti. Reiciendis earum cumque ut dolor porro omnis.

Repellendus quasi id animi enim. Quas voluptas itaque nemo architecto sed itaque. Ut sint quis ea dolores. Corporis quaerat voluptas aut.

Quia ducimus aut magni voluptate maiores ad eaque. A voluptatem et necessitatibus accusamus modi vitae corporis voluptatibus. Tempora officia quibusdam voluptas vitae. Vitae ex deleniti laudantium quidem ut et natus. Minima dolorem rerum quasi accusamus et culpa est doloribus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”