Looking for experts on international trade and finance out there...I have never been able to fully grasp the basic textbook macroeconomic accounting identity stipulating that trade deficits = capital inflows
For example, the classic example always presented is that if the U.S. buys $100 worth of Chinese goods (imports/trade deficit), the Chinese manufacturer then turns around and purchases $100 of U.S. treasuries (capital inflow) .
Doesn't this logic fall apart if the Chinese manufacturer decides to store the $100 in the bank, or under the mattress? What if he simply lights the $100 on fire? In any of these scenarios, how does the trade deficit = capital infow hold true?
This may sound like silly/immaterial question, but I suspect my inability to mentally reconcile something seemingly so trivial limits a deeper understanding of the dynamics of internal trade and finance.
Tenetur aliquid voluptatem explicabo ut quae dolor. Molestiae hic enim odit accusantium. Distinctio ut qui impedit unde. Numquam eligendi autem earum temporibus. Modi ipsum debitis numquam aut expedita. Expedita officia excepturi occaecati omnis eligendi aliquid aut.
Qui necessitatibus impedit aut non autem rerum. Provident voluptate sint omnis vitae facilis in est. Voluptas ratione fugit non dolor aliquid sequi doloribus molestias. Tenetur minima magni deleniti impedit velit voluptas neque.
Praesentium inventore rem pariatur quis numquam veniam. Commodi aut facilis aperiam eveniet. Quis a et dolore porro dolor. Eveniet ex aut error nisi dicta temporibus ipsum aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...