Transfer dilemma CMC vs Columbia GS

I’m currently at a non-target and was admitted to Claremont McKenna and Columbia GS, both for econ. At Claremont I would graduate debt free while Columbia GS I will likely have 120–140k in debt once I graduate. I’m just wondering if columbia gs is even worth the debt since Ive already accepted a 2023 internship at a MM HF (I applied to both schools before I had the internship locked up). I lived and worked in NYC for a year and absolutely loved it but I’m not sure if all things considered the debt is worth it.

Any input is appreciated, thanks!

 

I’m a big fan of Columbia, so I would say take on the debt.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

You say you have been accepted for transfer, but to the grad school? So, would you be looking at doing a PhD? If so, I'd ask what the goal is. If it is academia, Claremont will lead you nowhere, while Columbia will have great placement opportunities.

You do mention an internship at a MM HF, so if your goal is finance instead, I suppose Columbia would still afford you the better path moving forward. This is coming from a non-US person, and I know Claremont only in passing as an ok econ university, but not one I'd ever pick over Columbia. I know my way around the academic job market, both US and non-US, and econ PhD programmes, but if your goal is finance itself, perhaps that internship should get more consideration (and then still Columbia, I'd say).

 

Might be mistaken, but pretty sure OP means general studies rather than grad school. General studies is technically separate from columbia college and is geared more towards non traditional / transfer students from what i’ve seen

 

Yeah GS is general studies. I know quality alumni from Columbia GS.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 
Most Helpful

I’m surprised no one has pointed out that literally none of this is accurate… put aside choosing a school since that’s personal preference.

“I know CMC in passing as an OK Econ university” CMC is NOT a university, it is a college that only offers undergraduate studies, ie. If you were to separate Dartmouth’s College of arts and sciences from Tuck SOB. The quality of the education is as good as it gets, and yes, recruiting is quite solid out of the west coast. I see this as a very common misconception from international students who only care about a name since they go back home and that’s all that matters. If you took schools like UCLA, Emory, Wash U, Norte Dame, you went for the name over quality of education 1000%.

“If it’s academia, CMC will get you nowhere”… “I know my way around the academic market / Econ PhD programmes”. CMC is a top 10 LAC which is catered towards economics / business studies but from an academic perspective. This is probably the most inaccurate statement of all that was said because academia, especially in economics, are liberal arts schools’ bread and butter. This would be like saying that Williams, Amherst, or Swarthmore would get you nowhere in academia… or for an analogy, NYU would get you nowhere in business. It’s just nonsensical.

As for the general tone that’s CMC will not get you anywhere in finance, as someone below mentioned, CMC alums have done inexplicably well and there are no bigger names in finance than some CMC alums. Henry Kravis, George Roberts, and Parella all went to CMC. I know you can’t conflate those guys with immediate success as a 22 year old out of undergrad. But if you actually took the time to do a LinkedIn search, you’d see that per capita IBD roles are probably higher than Berkeley or half the ivies.

Not trying to be malicious or snobby here. Just don’t want misinformation floating around for important life decisions. Ultimately one should go to a school where there’s a mutual liking because you can recruit from any of these names. FWIW, I didn’t go to cmc but went to a top LAC, so have a soft spot here I will admit.

 

I’ll go against the crowd, if you were able to secure an offer at a non-target, and it is what you want to do, do not get in 6 figure debt for a name.

120k debt is a shit ton and future you will hate yourself for going in debt when you could’ve avoided it especially when your entire first years comp (and likely second) is going to student loans.

I can think of a lot of other things to do with 120k personally, so with that experience already you should be fine and have something to put on ur resume that’ll help you wherever you want to go.

Going to a well named school isn’t going to necessarily open up more opportunities for you other than networking, maybe? Seems like a lot of money wasted for no reason

 

This is going to sound really douchey, but I'm just going to lay it on you straight. If you plan on working in NYC post-grad, no girl is going to look twice at you when you say you went to Claremont. Now, if you don't care about dating life or already have a girlfriend, then you can kind of discard this, but my parents and my friends' parents would threaten to disown us for even going to dinner with you. These girls are also all 7 or above, slim bodies and nice clothes, and that's a New York 7. Ofc there's girls that don't care about this as much, but they're mostly going to fall outside of the Tech, Consulting, Law, Medical, and Finance industries.

 

Just remember OP, college is temporary, prestige is forever. Go Ivy League. 

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Quo ratione quo aliquid molestias est voluptatem veniam voluptatibus. Et omnis animi libero omnis exercitationem. Ut dolor reprehenderit illum dolores. Repellendus aut pariatur magni modi. Illo vel et aut totam. Fuga et repudiandae quaerat ab.

Minima dolores officia corrupti. Voluptatum deserunt dignissimos eos aut. Est dolor dolores quaerat omnis doloremque eaque nostrum unde. Recusandae repellat dicta sunt voluptas animi dolore id et. Omnis possimus est qui eveniet.

Hic officiis dolorum temporibus vel. Et sit ducimus blanditiis iste magnam voluptatem et enim. Blanditiis reiciendis accusamus aut dolor suscipit. Voluptas voluptas aliquid accusantium pariatur. Doloremque cupiditate quasi eum inventore repudiandae explicabo recusandae est. Iusto rerum est excepturi unde. Porro non totam repellendus quasi.

 

Quos omnis placeat rem molestiae eaque est sit. Sint dolor voluptatem dolore quo optio voluptatem dolores.

Et mollitia iste dolor ea laborum. Et nam dolore molestiae. Cum eaque vel atque. Magnam excepturi aperiam quia quos omnis. Et officiis nam recusandae architecto cumque illo.

Ut et perferendis modi non odit illum. Praesentium consequatur est sunt est. Explicabo veritatis iure cupiditate dignissimos. Ut tenetur laboriosam voluptas consequatur molestias. Recusandae odio quaerat aut totam harum non quod. Incidunt asperiores eum ut dolor natus soluta nemo. Explicabo suscipit harum totam quia non.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”