Where should there be more checks and balances?
It's come to my attention due to recent events, the perplexingly and blatant exitance of useless mid management Karen's and HR personnel. They both have similar profiles, but what's more important is that they spend the whole day talking and not doing shit.
"I heard Mark got engaged"
"OMG"
"Yes we totally should start doing this to improve corporate culture"
What the fuck are they getting paid for? It's nothing short of fascinating how these parasitic bitches get themselves ingrained in corporate organizations then are able to stay for decades.
I'm of the opinion there should be tangible guidelines enacted to push them into the light so to speak. Which category should be faced with more checks and balances to prevent the likelihood of their parasitizing exitance in businesses?
What the fuck is wrong with people on WSO. Did HR girl ignore your DM??
Ignore it. This is a troll post.
Nah I was trying to get some FUCKING WORK done (you know, like putting together a pitch deck for a $100mm fee deal), but a group of these cumrag bitches wouldn't stfu and I couldn't focus on something direly important
So I wrote this shit and now they fucked off to the cafeteria or wherever these cows congregate
there should be more checks and balances in many things
Didn't realize you were such a man of culture when it comes to MMA. Biggest point of agreement for me is the beach chairs.
+1
Care to elaborate on point 5? why did a reread of 12 rules make you not enjoy it as much anymore? I like some of his ideas based on his talks, but haven't read his books yet
I think it's a cognitive bias more than anything, I was being a little catty and sarcastic in the above, I still love the lessons JBP has said, despite his biggest critique being they aren't new ideas (news flash, no good ideas are new)
I started reading beyond order and it was good for a bit but then it felt like he was just rambling through each passage, it read kinda like a JRE podcast which is fine in that format but not so much for literature in my opinion. the 2nd time I was reading 12 rules was in a different language and sometimes when something isn't read in the original language it can read a little clunky (though for some reason NNT translations by the same company don't have this issue), so maybe that was it.
my main point is this - one of seneca's best works (shortness of life) can be read in less than an hour (<50 pages), JBP can make his point in less pages
Dana should have a separate "premium" circuit for the Conor vs. Mayweather vs. Jake Paul type events and a cheaper circuit for the rest. Separate those who want spectacle from those who love the sport.
The two single most important decisionmakers in the UFC matchmaking process (Dana, and whichever fighter is currently being faced with the prospect of an easy payday) are heavily in favor of Conor fights. So they're going to keep bringing them up.
Incidunt beatae ut aspernatur necessitatibus atque. Ut ut sed repellendus quos. Voluptatem deleniti minima voluptas perferendis ad deserunt velit.
Omnis repudiandae molestiae saepe soluta non vel. Distinctio perspiciatis quibusdam consectetur ullam. Veniam maxime eveniet tempora dolores dolores sed. Qui quia sint voluptatum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...