Anyone else Realize They are Too Dumb for PE?
I guess I finessed my way into a semi-target and then into IB. IB was not that hard for me (I was probably the worst analyst but I survived). I would just be an output monkey, listen to my associate and have him hold my hand, and didn't really have to think.
I am now 10 months into PE, and am most likely quitting and giving up this career soon. I realized I am just too dumb. I don't understand any processes, I don't understand anything bigger picture, I try to learn and understand it but just feel too dumb. I'm the one in the "weeds" and I constantly don't know how to back up anything, how to answer any questions or defend anything, etc. This is so different from banking - I felt pretty dumb in banking but I feel literally retarded now.
No joke if I don't get detailed steps on what to do, how to do it, etc from my VP I will literally not be able to do my job. So far 80% of my job there has been a "precedent" analysis or prior work that I have found and kind of reference / copy for what I am doing.
Sure, maybe the answer is I have to do this on my own - carve out technical prep and study times after work, or on weekends, etc. Maybe my "drive" is the issue here too, I want to get better and not be a retard at work but after I finish at 11pm-12am my last intention is to do more modeling prep for hours, to log in on a Saturday etc. Im just so burnt and feel too dumb for all of this.
Who cares. Just keep clipping checks and trying your best. Being bad at PE pays more than being good at most other jobs.
I agree who cares, I should just show up collect money put my head down and leave however this situation I am in has made my life a living hell I am just so beyond anxious and nervous and uneasy 24/7 because I know any second my e-mail will blow up with something I have 0 idea how to do or approach.
This happened to me OP. Legit could only understand half of what was going on
The anxiety is the bigger problem then. You do need to work to get that under control - seriously. Seek progressional help. The longer you stay in the business world the sooner you’ll realize that EVERYONE is just figuring it out everyday. You can make this easier on yourself by putting systems in place for certain tasks that you can default back onto.
For example, in banking I was SO bad with attention to detail so I had my very own templates for everything saved on my desktop that I knew were 100% correct which made checking my work so much faster.
Bump curious to hear other views here
Watch you get a good annual review for just being a good sport/pleasant to work with though. You sound completely devoid of ego which I can tell makes you pleasant to be around.
Thanks my man! Remember how I mentioned I was probably the worst analyst in my IB class? I actually got top bucket review and bonus 2 years in a row, and I know 10000% it was personality haha. However I know performance matters a LOT more in PE than IB so we'll see. Appreciate the comment though, made me feel better.
It's because he's normal and not drinking the kool aid. I sat next to a banker who went to Oxford and he said "my job is to sound smart, not to actually be smart." You have the self awareness to understand that they are overcomplicating things to make up for their lack of knowledge and understanding.
I'm with the other guy. Unless you're going back into banking, there's nothing that's going to pay as much. Who cares as long as you keep getting paid?
What is your end goal and why would you want to leave? If your goal is to make money just stay put.
Well I know I will 100% get shoved out if I am this incompetent, but you are right I can just collect paychecks until then.
The main issue is because of the stress. Since I literally know nothing, any new e-mail or project gives me like body numbing levels of physical anxiety. I could almost throw up anytime I know I will be put in a spot where I just have no idea what to do.
Odds are you'll be shoved out anyway. PE is a pyramid and only a few people get to stay.
I think you're overthinking things. You obviously know enough if you did banking and lasted this long in PE.
This legit happened to me
You seem like a good people person. Is there a BizDev function at your fund? Maybe at some point ask to switch to that?
I wouldn’t give your seniors too much credit. They’re smart, but not that smart. Definitely not all that smarter than you are, just experienced.
10 months into the job you still have lots to learn - you can process things efficiently, the next step is just listening to the VP and how they phrase questions, ask them “why” when they ask you to do stuff to learn how they think. I guarantee you after another year, you’ll realize they’re saying the same fucking thing 80% of the time themselves.
In banking and PE, I feel like the learning curve time differs but it’s steep when it happens, and after that you realize everyone’s the same. So yeah you might feel like a total dimbass now, but give it a few more months, maybe an intense process and a good VP to guide you, and then you’ll realize you’re actually average in a room full of average people who’ve learned to talk the talk and walk the walk.
I really appreciate the response, cheers.
I would give yourself another ~6months. Typically takes at least a year to get your feet under you and almost every associate has gone through some degree of this. There's not much rocket science to this job, just pattern recognition and posturing.
Yea, agree with everyone else here. Just keep trying your best until someone complains. Then have the chat.
Yeah man I pretty much felt the same as you did starting out. But as some have mentioned above I was always a team player, generally figured sh! out and was willing to grind hard to produce decent work. Have received top performance reviews every year and have been told there's a track past Senior Associate for me - I am very confident this is driven by having a good attitude and personable more than anything. Still feel way in over my head most of the time and have all the stress you mentioned, but you're probably not giving yourself enough credit, see how your first annual review goes then see how you feel.
Sounds more like you didn’t get any training, a lot confirms have onboarding training or boot camps these days. Then a mentor where MMV
you’re not too dumb, you just don’t know what to do
Is this a troll? PE interviews are multi round filled with modelling tests, case studies up to aptitude tests. The shops I interviewed at had literally candidates lined up from all over MBBs, banking, etc. - how would you just stumble your way in if you are that bad as you describe it?
You sound like one of the kids in school who always said their test went bad and then turned out to have performed well above average.
No this happens if target school or brand firm and early recruiting and luck
You would be surprised. If you look great on paper and fall into the pipeline that the firm recruits from the process can be extremely easy.
There are plenty of people who are book smart / can study for the interview but don’t perform on the job. They are two very different things.
I refuse to believe that after 10 months in a job, pulling 10-14 hours a day, you still don't see the big picture of many things unless you have 80 IQ (what's your undergrad btw, to get some idea on how intelligent you were prior to banking - just don't say physics plz). On defending/arguing things that's another story. I can partly blame this on the training.
The issue is that it's ok to ask questions, especially when you are new (and preferably lots of questions and good questions), however you have 10 months in the role so asking them now will raise eyebrows. So just sit quiet and keep taking your paycheck - and if you want to do this long-term better start hitting some books/GPT to explain you everything you don't get because it's not that hard.
Another idea is that maybe you lack curiosity and that prevented you from learning what was above the minimum requirements of your job, which means that you may not be as interested in this career path or in general you might not have curiosity for anything, which should give you even more reasons to stay in your role as it doesn't require the same brainpower/constant seeking of novel ideas to do your job properly as in public markets/etc. and has some prestige/compensation and a luck element that may hide incompetence.
so just out of curiosity, any examples of what processes/bigger picture you don't understand?
I don’t understand how the transaction structure was decided on and how the different terms were negotiated and how they came to that decision. As well I find I don’t fully understand every single part of how the business run or make money and their business models for complex companies with a 1 week sprint confuse me. Cannot think through inputs in the model and what are the key drivers and how those drivers should change overtime.
Believe it not these are questions that chat GPT can get you answers that are 70% of the way there which is enough to go to your seniors with to have them fill in the other 30%. I do this all the time.
This happened to me in PE
how long did you stay in PE and what did you do after?
I doubt you are actually dumb. Truly dumb people wouldn't stop to think maybe I'm too dumb for this? (Dunning-Kruger effect). Seems like you simply need some mentorship. Perhaps book a session with @CompBanker who started a service a few years ago that provides personalized career mentorship.
I can't tell if you're trolling? What is complicated about PE?
There are plenty of people who aren't the brightest minds that made plenty of money and advanced extremely far, would just keep going. You are still very young.
There's a great VC investor who's dumb as rocks. He's worth billions.
Don't let your lack of intellectualism keep you from success brosky.
that's most VC investors tbh
After two years in PE, I realize how many people even jump from place to palce or get by and now sit in senior roles. Pretty absurd when you think about it.
Good thing for you is that most in PE are a bunch of tards where the “math” is four function and most scenarios have probly already been modeled somewhere and stored on some share drive.
I hear you – this sounds like classic imposter syndrome to me, not a reflection of your actual ability. A few things that help me:
You’ve already powered through IB and survived ten months in PE—give yourself credit for how far you’ve come, lean into small wins, and know that growth often feels uncomfortable before it clicks. You’ve got this.
"Get Laid. I will do wonders for your confidence."
Are you saying OP should get laid with you?
This post shows a high level of awareness. I think you are probably being too hard on yourself though. Without hyperbole, some of the stupidest people I have ever met work in private equity (admittedly at the junior level of some 100MM fund you've never heard of, and they will never advance).
Making it through a semi-target and doing well enough to land a job in IBD, and then surviving the two years means your intelligence probably isn't the problem. Perhaps you're being asked to do too much too fast, or to handle more Senior Associate type work, but I really dont think your raw IQ is the thing holding you back. You are disadvantaged in that you survived banking without being forced to do more of the critical thinking elements, which admittedly start later in banking, but some Analysts get exposure to them (or look at the problems their Associates face and try to decide how they would solve them).
I would lower your expectations and try and get incrementally better at each task, and re-evaluate where you are six months from now. Unless you think you will be fired for performance, perhaps it is better to try and push through this challenging period, assuming you want to.
The flip side is I could be completely wrong, and you lack the passion and interest required to try and think critically about how to excel in the role. I know I sucked at banking and was always horrible at the critical thinking elements, but then I switched to consulting and had so much more interest in the work I was doing, that I was top bucket almost immediately.
I recently left M&A after 5 years and the biggest takeaway was that I was mediocre the entire time because the passion was never really there. I am now being fast tracked in a Strategy role and have found much more meaning in the work I do.
I know my various word vomit structured points don't really go hand in hand, but I wanted to throw out several different perspectives because it is hard to gauge what the real issue is, at least from my POV.
Not OP but super helpful perspective, thank you. Honestly had similar feelings to you, I’m not sure if banking just sucked the life out of me and if there’s truly greener pastures out there, but nice to hear it from someone else
Remember this, if you are hardworking enough to get into banking, you are smart and hardworking enough to be very successful at something. With that said, be open and patient as it took me a long time to find something I was passionate at and good at. In fact, I took several roles where I was neither passionate nor good at them, but in hindsight, they were critical stepping stones to getting me to where I am now.
While I think there are some true geniuses in PE, imo I don't think there are that many and most people are above average intelligence but just have seen a ton of deal reps. The talented partners that crush it are very creative and love doing deals (not necessarily intelligent beyond your capabilities) - so I don't think you should let your experience 10 months in get you down.
I am the same I feel like I am incompetent and the stress that somebody will find out is what’s eating me alive. Every new task or deal I get staffed on I wonder if I will manage to get by with the task at, it’s affecting my body like crazy where I am getting body numbing levels of physical anxiety. I could almost throw up anytime I know I will be put in a spot where I just have no idea what to do and deadlines are approaching and everyone will get upset and angry because timelines are pressing
Aut nobis nemo quo autem hic eligendi tempore. Incidunt architecto debitis quibusdam dolore dolore aut. Ut placeat dignissimos cum et molestiae omnis fuga. Soluta excepturi ea inventore voluptate. Eum sequi aut consectetur eum natus ut.
Ut quis magnam quis doloremque libero omnis illum. Reiciendis sit aliquam incidunt enim. Sequi reprehenderit debitis iusto in sequi facere iste. Deserunt placeat itaque et. Consequuntur incidunt consequatur et. Animi voluptatum voluptas minus incidunt vel sed alias. Quaerat veritatis quaerat numquam atque a enim.
At eum perspiciatis animi animi. Dignissimos nesciunt non aut perspiciatis sequi et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Consequatur expedita qui optio ducimus atque. Laudantium perspiciatis quod et ratione porro autem. Enim tenetur reprehenderit voluptatem quia sint. Voluptas non et libero. Perspiciatis qui omnis asperiores porro quam officiis.
Sit nam consequatur cum aut fuga praesentium odit voluptas. Optio et qui consequatur ut animi quam est. Doloremque porro nobis dolores ut reiciendis iusto consectetur eum. Et iste mollitia qui autem quam rerum earum.
Nemo provident vel fugiat ut suscipit magnam. Ipsa ipsam repellat cum veniam. Enim quas optio rerum qui delectus.
Doloremque fugit aperiam iste nostrum reprehenderit iure sapiente. Earum aspernatur temporibus ratione enim ut similique. Occaecati ipsum qui distinctio velit enim maiores. Dolor incidunt animi iusto odio molestias natus accusamus est. Odit et eaque eos quia distinctio atque aut. Provident fugiat et eum eos et amet.