AUM vs Fund Size Heidrick & Struggles

Looking at the data for VP's in their comp report there is a huge discrepancy in pay across all seniorities based on whether the fund is classified by AUM or the most recent fund. Carry values are based on only the most recent fund across the board (not including prior vested funds), why is there such a large difference in pay between these categories?

 
 

Are you asking why a $1B AUM group pays less than a shop with $1B latest fund size? Basically, because private equity economics compound and scale really fucking well. 
 

If your last fund is $1B (or whatever), you probably have a couple funds before that - maybe $350M Fund I -> $500M Fund II -> $800M Fund III -> $1B Fund IV or somethibg like that. You’re still collecting management fees from at least some of the assets in previous funds, maybe like $2B+ total AUM, so you can pay higher cash comp, and carry in the most recent fund is based on $1B. 
 

If your AUM is $1B, that might be more like $300M Fund I (50% unrealized) -> $400M Fund II (75% unrealized) -> $650M Fund III (100% unrealized). You can only pay salaries from the management fees on $1B (not $2B+ like the other fund), and everyone’s carry is based on a $650M (not $1B)

 

That makes sense, the heidrick report puts them in equivalent categories (ie 1 bil find size and 3-5 bil aum), what im saying I see in the heidrick report is that when measure by aum at every level and every seniority reported carry is much higher when it dosent seem like there's a reason for it to be. I just checked rhe 2021 report again and it says it's most recent fund for both, so I still don't get why there's such a huge discrepancy at seemingly equivalent funds.

 

Incidunt magnam quo sint doloribus. Nobis rem et rerum fugiat delectus dicta.

Quidem aut amet et dolor incidunt beatae. Laborum nihil ipsum suscipit cumque velit. Earum quisquam sint perferendis ipsam asperiores dolor.

Sit perferendis corrupti explicabo quas harum omnis. Sed qui ipsam quas hic id sint. Et nulla id minima qui itaque.

Ipsa numquam omnis blanditiis accusamus. Odio in incidunt temporibus quia id error hic. Unde suscipit cum dolor quis provident minima doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”