Best Growth Shops

Looking to leave UMM/MF PE, what are the best growth shops right now? I know there are traditional VC firms, growth equity firms, and crossovers. I am not really interested in the more bootstrapped buyout investing, more so thinking about growth VC. Would really appreciate a layout of the landscape on who the best players to target are.

33 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of the best growth shops across different categories:

MegaFunds with Growth Equity Arms

These are large, established firms with dedicated growth equity strategies: - Blackstone Growth - KKR Growth - General Atlantic - TPG Growth - Bain Capital Tech Opportunities

Tech/Enterprise SaaS-Focused Growth Equity Firms

These firms specialize in tech and SaaS investments: - IVP - Insight Partners - Spectrum Equity - Summit Partners - TCV - TA Associates - Greenspring - Adams Street - JMI Equity - Greycroft - SGE - Volition - GS Growth

Mid-Market/Tech Growth Equity Firms

These firms focus on mid-market tech investments: - LLR Partners - Accel-KKR (AKKR) - Level Equity - Kayne Anderson - Silversmith Capital Partners - FTV Capital - Norwest Venture Partners (their growth fund leans mid-market)

Venture Capital Firms with Growth Equity Arms

These are traditional VC firms that also have growth equity strategies: - Sequoia - Andreessen Horowitz - General Catalyst - Accel - Index Ventures - Menlo Ventures - Bessemer Venture Partners

Crossover Funds

These funds operate at the intersection of VC and PE, often investing in later-stage growth companies: - Dragoneer Investment Group - Iconiq Capital - CapitalG (Google’s growth equity arm)

Key Considerations

  • Stage Focus: Growth equity firms like General Atlantic, Insight Partners, and TCV focus on companies with meaningful revenue (e.g., $25-100M+) and take market/execution risk. These are more traditional in their sourcing and underwriting.
  • Crossover vs. Growth VC: Crossover funds like Dragoneer and Iconiq often compete with VC-style growth equity firms but may have a slightly different approach, focusing on later-stage companies.
  • Recruiting: Growth equity recruiting is less rigid than traditional PE. Firms like Summit and JMI are known for off-cycle recruiting, while others like General Atlantic may follow more structured processes.

If you're looking to transition from UMM/MF PE, targeting firms like General Atlantic, Insight Partners, or TCV could be a great fit, as they value candidates with strong PE backgrounds.

Sources: Tech Growth Equity vs Tech Leveraged Buyout Firms, Why the hate towards growth PE / sourcing (e.g. KKR Tech)?, Top Venture Capitals that hire juniors?, Are Growth Equity / Venture Growth Firms Still Open to Unique Backgrounds, Landscape of Growth Equity in 2020

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I put them in two buckets:


1) High-growth, sexy and cash-burning growth investment: ICONIQ, TCV, Index, Sequoia, A16z, Tiger (struggling), etc.


2) Growthy deals but more PE investor mindset: General Atlantic, TA, Silver Smith, Summit Partners, MF PE Growth Arms (BX, KKR, CVC, TPG, etc.)


Probably the second bucket is in average doing better returns than the first one imo, but they have a more PE DD style than “let’s back visionary founders” mindset  

 

In category one I would say the best investors are:

  • ICONIQ : pure—play growth shop, known for paying up for the top quality asset in series B and series C. Just raised a fresh $4B fund so clearly not struggling (backed by tech billionaires which might have forgiven some of the mistakes from 2021)
  • TCV: great shop that did Revolut, and other unicorns at the series B and series C. Probably my favourite for growth together with ICONIQ
  • GS growth: doing some sexy rounds like Revolut and Databricks, 73 Strings, but also some of the bootstrapped companies
  • Insight Partners: same as GS, doing the Databricks late stage round as well as more traditional software LBOs. Great culture.
  • Top tier VC with growth arms will probably survive as well due to brand name: General Catalyst, Sequoia, Index, A16z, Northzone, etc
  • Sector focused growth fund: Left Lane for consumer tech, GA Horizon fund for clean tech, etc
  • Re: Summit partners is a sourcing tech LBO shop focused on bootstrapped and profitable /  break even business, not high flying VC rounds
 

Summit Partners is a great one, they invested in a company I used to work at that was much more consumer retail than tech growth. 

I joined the company when it was MF PE backed (Summit sold it to to a consortium led by a MF PE). Company grew insanely fast with Summit's help. Ended up making a lot of the original equity owners millionaires when Summit exited.

 

WLB

I put them in two buckets:


1) High-growth, sexy and cash-burning growth investment: ICONIQ, TCV, Index, Sequoia, A16z, Tiger (struggling), etc.


2) Growthy deals but more PE investor mindset: General Atlantic, TA, Silver Smith, Summit Partners, MF PE Growth Arms (BX, KKR, CVC, TPG, etc.)


Probably the second bucket is in average doing better returns than the first one imo, but they have a more PE DD style than “let’s back visionary founders” mindset  

At which growth shops can you do internships at? I know that tcv and TA generally dont take any interns in london.

 

Actually heard negative things about Insight’s culture, very sharp elbowed. Thrive is another one I’d flag — they’re pretty incredible returns-wise, but good luck getting a job there


General Catalyst, Sequoia, A16Z, Index are all pretty differentiated from a fund size standpoint for VC growth. All perform well in specific sub sectors (albeit struggle in others). Lightspeed is also huge but notably has struggled recently

 

This is my opinion (in order of prestige), highly subjective, likely forgetting some important ones. Some of these performed terribly in 2020/2021 in the ZIRP era so their legacy is TBD.

Venture Growth: Sequoia, A16Z, Accel, Index, Insight, BVP, NEA, Thrive, KP, GC, Bond, IVP, Lightspeed, ICONIQ, Capital G, Meritech, NVP (venture), Battery Ventures, Spark, Redpoint, Stripes

Bootstrapped + Buyout Growth: GA, TA Associates, Summit, TPG Growth, Thoma Bravo, Blackstone Growth, PSG, NVP (growth), FTV, Great Hill, Spectrum, Silversmith, Sageview

Crossover: Coatue, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, Altimeter, TCV, Tiger Global

 

Any idea what comp/exits look like at the bootstrapped / buyout growth firms? Would you be able to move from one to a crossover fund?

 
Controversial

I know you said this is subjective, but this list is pretty contrarian. Ordering here is honestly laughable, clearly written by someone not in the industry. TCV and Tiger Global belong at the bottom of the crossover list. FTV are bootstrapped investors not venture growth investors. Insight, BVP, Lightspeed, and NEA aren't as good at venture growth as many of the firms below them. GC as well. Where is Accel...? Redpoint and Spark should be way higher up. Missing a couple of top crossover players as well. 
 

For OP, within venture growth, you will be best served going to any top crossover (that isn't TCV or Tiger Global), a top multi-stage growth team (Sequoia, Index, KP-caliber, not NEA, BVP-caliber), or one of the venture growth-focused shops (BOND, IVP, Meritech, ICONIQ - other than AN2 in IB-Cov, I don't know a single person who would turn down a job at one of these four for BVP, NEA, Insight, or GC).

 

I don’t know why you propose top multi-stage firms like there is any chance someone from UMM / MF PE who barely knows anything about growth would ever get a job there, thats completely unrealistic. 

I also strongly disagree that IVP and ICONIQ are clearly more prestigious than BVP, NEA, Insight, and GC —implying that is a no brainer is a hot take

BOND and Meritech I could be convinced are more prestigious because the average investor there is very sharp and (I would assume) well comped

In hindsight I agree Tiger should be at the bottom, FTV should be in bootstrapped / buyout, and Accel should be included. What are some other good crossover funds that could be added?

 
Most Helpful

A quick search of people who do growth at multi-stage firms would tell you that it's very feasible to get it out of MF PE. For venture growth, those two are 100 percent better and I think most people actually in VC would agree. BVP and NEA's bread and butter is early-stage not growth (brand name in early stage in my opinion does not equal prestige in venture growth). Insight was plagued with bad returns since they tossed money at literally anything but honestly post-Wiz acquisition things are looking better for them (as long as they don't try and index the private tech market again). Crossover-wise Alkeon and Ribbit should be there (Ribbit is literally one of the top-performing funds of the last decade lol). 

I just feel like your list is driven by who has the largest LinkedIn and Forbes presence and not who are respected/good investors in venture growth. Also, for context, I work at a "prestigious" multi-stage, and I think a lot of people, not just you, equate robust early-stage history and returns with good/prestigious venture growth investing and that's so far from the truth (they are fundamentally different types of investing - think of how BX/TB Growth are absolutely terrible even though their firms are top names in PE). Also MSing my stuff as low quality when you're editing your comments based on what I said is ridiculous. Classic banker behavior.

 

Can anyone comment on GS growth, specifically returns and expertise? Looks to me like they are followers and the fund returns are mediocre at best, but just my perception. There was an article a few years back that they were crushing it but that was when everything in tech was multiplying in value. Curious as to how they have performed recently in a tougher investing climate...

 

Officiis facere molestiae quaerat placeat. Aspernatur repellat esse qui laborum consequatur. Distinctio nostrum repellendus quos a velit. Provident rerum expedita sapiente pariatur non vitae. Quaerat asperiores suscipit architecto velit a aut voluptas. Laborum autem maxime et et. Nostrum quam aut autem ab.

Error facilis est amet amet. Quae suscipit dolorum est ab eos iste. Consequuntur autem voluptas veritatis et. Optio ipsam corrupti sit reprehenderit atque. Qui unde nihil facilis voluptatem quibusdam. Eos excepturi harum odit non qui ullam. Quas odit voluptatibus eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”