Cash EBITDA for tech businesses vs EBITDA - maintenance capex for non-tech businesses

Hi all,

I was looking for any takes on why or why not applying a cash EBITDA lens to investments in technology businesses is similar to applying an EBITDA less maintenance capex for non-tech businesses?

Thanks in advance!

5 Comments
 

Because of the upfront nature of certain contractual-based tech services that can inflate EBITDA in the initial years of the contract/maintenance agreement (without a corresponding reduction of expenses as services are rendered throughout the life of the contract - 1, 3, 5 years).

Cash EBITDA and EBITDA-maint capex are two different and disparate concepts, totally. If you use Cash EBITDA then you need to also factor in the impact of changes in deferred revenue.

 
Most Helpful

Cash EBITDA typically takes into account a few different components:

1. Change in deferred revenue: said differently, most software contracts are paid annually upfront, so you collect 12 months of revenue before you recognize it, and this unrecognized delta is included in cash EBITDA. Sometimes you'll see buyers apply a margin / haircut to this to reflect the future costs to deliver and support the revenue. 

2. Cash commissions: correspondingly, you should take into account the deferred commissions required to book (sell) these software contracts. 

3. Capitalized software: Frankly, most software investors burden R&D (and therefore EBITDA) for capitalized software even when just looking at Adj. GAAP EBITDA, but this should unequivocally be burdened in a cash EBITDA concept. 

 

Harum dolor non alias animi pariatur voluptate. Deserunt qui similique fuga doloribus voluptatem dolores molestiae quia. Est necessitatibus aut consequatur ipsa in molestiae. Repellat rem vel hic ab libero. Asperiores iusto eum nostrum iure.

Ratione eveniet rem voluptatem doloremque consequatur rerum. Nulla a reiciendis ut.

Et eaque quia iure error numquam facilis molestias et. Quo soluta officiis eos aut excepturi. Porro qui sint qui quo placeat.

Voluptas quo accusamus omnis non. Illum autem et possimus aliquid. Eum pariatur a iusto nihil doloribus voluptatibus magnam. Similique enim placeat ullam voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”