I would choose Veritas if I want to do PE in the long-term

 

Is this for 2023 summer start? Thought CVC is not going yet

 

All very solid funds and will set you up for a great PE career. Given team sizes / maturity, I’d imagine all are default 2/3 and out unless you are exceptional or go to bschool. Pick wherever you liked the location / people most and enjoyed the industry focus (Veritas in particular plays in a fairly niche space). Ideally that is what will catalyze the most professional development and learning opportunities for you. You’re in a great spot!

 

I think CVC is not default two year and out, they do a lot of internal promotes and don't require B-school. Agree with the other 2. 

 

Great firms. Can't speak to CVC as I've had no interaction both in recruitment or in my day job. Location would probably be my first biggest factor of consideration. Hours at TPG capital and Veritas are comparable. Only can speak to TPG comp as I didn't get a Veritas offer but Vertias has been doing really well with some of their recent investments (thinking AthenaHealth and Cotiviti) so I'm sure they pay in line with MF or close. Given their recent performance I would bet they'll be able to raise a massive fund next time around so there will be sufficient capital when you start. From what I understand both funds are 2 years and out so not sure if the claim that Veritas is for career PE holds up. One small benefit of TPG I've noticed is they place ridiculously well at HBS and GSB. Every year those schools come to their office directly to recruit. Something to consider if MBA is a move you want to make. 

 
Most Helpful

One broader consideration is to not over consider "returns"; in a two-year program, you really only probably will be able to be a part of one investment and really the only people who stay at a fund long enough to "see" returns from start to finish are Partner / MD / some principals. Now, if one fund has absolute horrid returns than of course that's a consideration, but that 100% isn't the case for these 3 names.

- Veritas sweaty sweaty and old fashioned culture; direct promote extremely difficult; great returns 

- TPG: iconic but location....Great if you like SF, horrid if you aren't. Personally, I couldn't imagine working PE hours and hating the city you live in / not having friends. 

- CVC: another iconic fund. Would honestly 100% go with CVC unless the offer is in an industry group you hate. 

^ ALL 3 have a lot of clout, would really really not judge your decision purely based off that..

 

As someone who has worked extensively on multiple sell-sides with most these names, here are my thoughts:

1) TPG: super broad given there are so many industry groups / strategies within TPG. Almost too broad to give any thoughts beyond the fact that it's in SF. If you're from SF, I'd go with TPG. If you're not, then I personally 100% would not choose TPG.

2) Veritas: solid returns but this doesn't really mean much at the junior level. All 3 funds will provide equally strong learning experiences. Veritas was very sweaty from our interacts, associates seemed miserable but that's just my experience.

3) CVC: solid HC, don't know about other groups but all around an iconic name...

NOT taking into account location, I'd go TPG > CVC > Veritas.

TAKING into account location, pretty strongly feel CVC > Veritas > TPG

 

Agreed but honestly (even without location) would at least say CVC = TPG. TPG has been struggling recently while CVC is on a huge rise / uptick

Also think CVC has better culture / not strict 2 year and out 

 

Disagree with this. CVC is still predominantly based in Europe with a growing presence in US. TPG has a good brand name and reputation in the space hence why they were able to go public and continue raising bigger funds.

 

Look at CVCs latest fund - it's is 24bn usd. Tpg is 14bn usd. 

CVC is also going public later this year....

 

Currently work at one of these firms / have close friends at the other two. Would order as TPG >= Veritas >> CVC. 

The main issue with CVC is that it is largely based in Europe, both from a headcount and capital deployment perspective. This means that the US offices will often serve as satellite offices that play second-fiddle to European HQ. Additionally, CVC is notorious for having MASSIVE memos; have good knowledge that all outputs are shown in both USD and EUR. They’re a great fund in Europe, but simply not as strong in the US as the other European funds like Permira or Apax
 

On TPG vs. Veritas, would say TPG if you are location agnostic given brand name if you were to go to B School / recruit for hedge fund. Don’t think there will be meaningful difference if looking to stay in PE. Also, like other posters have mentioned, need to think about industry interests given vertical within TPG vs. Veritas’ mix of Healthcare, Education, and Gov services. 
 

On comp: unsure on CVC, but TPG: ~$325k, Veritas: ~$350k (both firsthand accounts)
 

 

Currently work at one of these firms / have close friends at the other two. Would order as TPG >= Veritas >> CVC. 

The main issue with CVC is that it is largely based in Europe, both from a headcount and capital deployment perspective. This means that the US offices will often serve as satellite offices that play second-fiddle to European HQ. Additionally, CVC is notorious for having MASSIVE memos; have good knowledge that all outputs are shown in both USD and EUR. They're a great fund in Europe, but simply not as strong in the US as the other European funds like Permira or Apax. 
 

On TPG vs. Veritas, would say TPG if you are location agnostic given brand name if you were to go to B School / recruit for hedge fund. Don't think there will be meaningful difference if looking to stay in PE. Also, like other posters have mentioned, need to think about industry interests given vertical within TPG vs. Veritas' mix of Healthcare, Education, and Gov services. 
 

On comp: unsure on CVC, but TPG: ~$325k, Veritas: ~$350k (both firsthand accounts)
 

There are so many factual errors in this post that it’s hilarious. Blind leading the blind. “All outputs in euro and dollar” would be one of the most retarded rules ever. Several other conceptual errors too

 
Controversial

Solid fund but well below all three of these. 

 

Prob biased because I worked at TPG, but TPG is the last on this list. CVC=Permira=>Veritas > TPG. You just wont get any dollars of carry as a VP if the you dont hit your hurdle rate (which is the case with TPG...so all we did was raise climate and ESG funds). Consumer team falling apart right now (you can literally see the attrition on Linkedin lol)

Am currently at a comp to Veritas right now. Definitely jealous of how much my friends who are principals made in carry, but also dont envy their WLB at all.... Permira was falling apart like 15 years ago but now does front page WSJ deals (Zendesk, McAfee) and now performs extremely well, insane turnaround. One of the few MFs right now that has successful fundraising in this environment. But are known to be sweaty. CVC well known brand in Europe and building out presence in NYC, sweaty too. Good performance. Good culture at all except Veritas, and some teams at TPG. 

 

I hear a lot of contradictory info on Veritas. Do they pay above or below street? 

 

Perspiciatis totam commodi tenetur natus corporis officiis mollitia. Praesentium omnis pariatur explicabo aspernatur ut laudantium. Laudantium non odit est reprehenderit. Repudiandae aliquid velit doloremque cumque quis dolores officiis perspiciatis. Aspernatur facilis aliquid maxime quo iure maiores voluptas.

Voluptates unde at consequuntur ut. Distinctio blanditiis ut quia quasi qui. Eos sunt cum id ea dignissimos quo. Quia pariatur unde nihil expedita.

 

Fuga fugiat facilis id est voluptas fuga tempora. Sed aut cumque sequi ad voluptas et dolore. Aut commodi fugiat occaecati.

Incidunt ipsam recusandae tempore vel aspernatur nostrum. Reiciendis incidunt et assumenda quae non magnam maiores. Autem facere molestiae earum corrupti pariatur est soluta. Velit perspiciatis ad voluptatem illum ut.

Tenetur rerum est dolor eaque qui. Quibusdam voluptatem molestias recusandae iure occaecati quo sed. Sit velit voluptatem molestiae eius. Quidem in esse rerum consectetur. Rem enim non iure sit voluptates repellat accusantium quam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”