Difficult situation - help needed

Hi gang, 

Bit of a downer - I just got fired after 8 months at an UMM PE firm. I came from c.4 years at an MBB shop focusing on PE work and then landed this gig towards the end of last year. 

I knew my modelling skills needed work and I was really trying to improve them but as luck would have it, I ended up mainly working with a neurotic/anxious VP who would literally go through every cell in my model and call me out for mistakes in formatting and make a big deal when I missed a niche part of the model. This feedback made its way to the head of the team who essentially fired me at my annual review (came as a shock!). 

Don't get me wrong, I could have produced more error free work, but I do also think I came from a non-finance background so could have been cut some slack on the modelling and given more time. I also used to frequently hear the other associate in my team get similar feedback from the other VP/director but seems like that VP/Director was more thoughtful and less hyperbolic when it came to feedback to the partner. 

First time i've been fired so feeling pretty down, especially given the market for hiring apparently is pretty slow (especially with summer around the corner). Any advice?

Thanks all

25 Comments
 

PE funds are not set up to take consultants unless it’s one that takes consultants in regular course - Bain, Advent, Charlesbank, etc.

dont worry about it - it happens, you’re not the first and not the last.

lateral market is pretty dead and there’s a vast overabundance of mid-levels. I’m going to hazard a guess that you enjoyed MBB culture more than you did PE. Not exactly gangbusters in MBB world right now - but consider moving back?

either that or corporate is likely the most straightforward move. Lateral to another fund is going to be extremely difficult right now and for the foreseeable future (it’s the market)

 

My honest advice (please no MS) - maybe PE isn't for you. It sounds like you got an unfair shake with no 'second chances' / time to ramp, but it also sounds like modelling/financial analysis might not be your forte and it's unfortunately a really critical component of the PE job.

I'm a former consultant (MBB) turned PE, and I actually audit my associates' models really thoroughly (check most rows). Fine if there are minor mistakes, but I expect them to be fixed in the next iteration (once I share feedback) and then ideally not repeated in future work. I give leniency to consultants in the beginning but that rope runs out pretty quickly, especially if I'm not seeing quick improvement.

Other ideas for you:

  • Venture capital
  • Back to MBB (particularly private equity group would really value your experience)
  • Operations role at a PE-backed company
  • PE ops team
  • Chief of staff roles
 
Most Helpful

Absolutely, random collection off the top of my head:

  • Mis-linking cells (e.g., driving YoY growth rate off 3 quarters back instead of 4; linking output tab to wrong column from inputs (e.g., off by a year))
  • Busted formulas resulting in quarterlies and annuals not tying out properly (same with monthlies if built that granularly)
  • Wrong signs on FCF builds, especially NWC
  • Stub period mechanics not working correctly
  • Pet peeve - using SUMIFS for totals (fine to bring in data or pull from across columns, but I don't like when Total Revenue or Gross Profit or EBITDA is a SUMIF, rather have a live formula as a check that everything pulls properly)
  • Showing valuation metrics off time periods that are no longer relevant (usually because used stale model or not thinking) (e.g., if we're mid-2024, I don't care about 2023 EBITDA multiples anymore, at least in software-land)
  • Recycling cap structures or labels from stale templates (e.g., 1L/2L lingo for a basic unitranche term loan model)
  • Recycled/stale/mis-functioning waterfalls (e.g., re-using a model with bespoke liquidation preference functionality for a clean deal)
 

^ Good list by SaasChimp 

I used to these kind of cell by cell audits - it's just good hygiene, no arguing with that.

However, over time, I realized that almost all of the time, unless the model is just completely busted in a laughable way (like... you're exiting the wrong year), the model does not matter at all at least in its predictive power as to the ultimate outcome. I spend more of my time thinking about all the ways the business can create value or get screwed - and am I structurally set up to "win" from a probability distribution perspective (i,e, are there more ways to hit single / doubles than strike out?)

Warren Buffet literally does not model. And I ever owned my own firm, I'd make a rule that models can't be over 2-3 pages long period full stop. 

 

First off, if you find yourself tying a lot of your "worth" to your job and/or this outcome, carve out some space to break that link. It isn't easy if that linkage is already established, but it'll provide you a lot more clarity and the ability to do an honest self-assessment. Leaving that linkage in place is a ticking time bomb for your health. 

Secondly, don't rule out PE, unless you genuinely believe it isn't for you and you don't possess the skills and desire to do so. There are so many flavors of PE under the sun, (MF, UMM, LMM, Infra, and then all the sub-verticals within each those). Furthermore, you then have significant dispersion among firms in those categories AND then again further dispersion among partners and VPs. I'm assuming you were an associate (vs your title in your profile). Sometimes you get the wrong VP, in the wrong group, and there isn't much you can do to change that path. I've been there at different stages in my career. 

Thirdly, when ready, do a sober self-assessment. How was your attitude? Despite your mistakes, did you resent the VP? Outside of what you've outlined from a technical standpoint, were you executing flawlessly on other things? How was your relationship with your peers and portcos? The goal here isn't to justify or find fault in a situation that's already happened. It's taking stock of making sure you know what you can improve upon. I don't have UMM experience, but from what I've seen in professional services, you typically don't get let go in 8 months for something that can be fixed generally quickly. Additionally, you then need to ask, how was the firm doing? Were you just a casualty of a business decision because the firm was performing poorly? Was the VP up for promotion and his portcos and deals seemed to be soft and maybe you were just at the wrong place at the wrong time? I know this may seem long-winded, but I hope you can see the core theme is to help you ultimately discover why it happened, you to generate an honest self-assessment about it, and move on to be successful in the future.

This is all just a small blip in your career. Be thoughtful, transparent, and push forward - lots of opportunities out there. Best of luck

 
skyline_77

First off, if you find yourself tying a lot of your "worth" to your job and/or this outcome, carve out some space to break that link. It isn't easy if that linkage is already established, but it'll provide you a lot more clarity and the ability to do an honest self-assessment. Leaving that linkage in place is a ticking time bomb for your health. 

Secondly, don't rule out PE, unless you genuinely believe it isn't for you and you don't possess the skills and desire to do so. There are so many flavors of PE under the sun, (MF, UMM, LMM, Infra, and then all the sub-verticals within each those). Furthermore, you then have significant dispersion among firms in those categories AND then again further dispersion among partners and VPs. I'm assuming you were an associate (vs your title in your profile). Sometimes you get the wrong VP, in the wrong group, and there isn't much you can do to change that path. I've been there at different stages in my career. 

Thirdly, when ready, do a sober self-assessment. How was your attitude? Despite your mistakes, did you resent the VP? Outside of what you've outlined from a technical standpoint, were you executing flawlessly on other things? How was your relationship with your peers and portcos? The goal here isn't to justify or find fault in a situation that's already happened. It's taking stock of making sure you know what you can improve upon. I don't have UMM experience, but from what I've seen in professional services, you typically don't get let go in 8 months for something that can be fixed generally quickly. Additionally, you then need to ask, how was the firm doing? Were you just a casualty of a business decision because the firm was performing poorly? Was the VP up for promotion and his portcos and deals seemed to be soft and maybe you were just at the wrong place at the wrong time? I know this may seem long-winded, but I hope you can see the core theme is to help you ultimately discover why it happened, you to generate an honest self-assessment about it, and move on to be successful in the future.

This is all just a small blip in your career. Be thoughtful, transparent, and push forward - lots of opportunities out there. Best of luck

dude has no shot in Infra PE if he is struggling with consumer / vanilla PE models 

 

Do not listen to comments about how "PE may not be for you" - you need to build and work on developing "safe hands" - MBB fosters the exact opposite of this thinking and you were there for 4 years - you need time to wash the shit out of your brain - keep at it - keep committed to the industry - work on your safe hands - you got this

PS: I have worked in both MBB and top tier EB - I know exactly how the thinking differs between these two very different industries.

SOFR+400
 

Vel beatae neque aut dolor nobis et laboriosam perferendis. Non debitis officia odit ea officia placeat. Quia accusamus non qui consequatur. Quia earum fuga consequatur saepe at sint.

SOFR+400

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”