EBITDA growth vs Multiple expansion
In PE, why would firms prefer returns to come from EBITDA growth as opposed to multiple expansion? Is it just cause cash flow is important in repaying debt principal and interest?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +142 | What’s “the path” now? | 56 | 1d |
| +105 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 2h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 1d |
| +37 | 3rd Year IB Analyst, Top Bucket, Still No PE Offer. What Would You Do? | 19 | 1d |
| +25 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 10 | 4d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 2d |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 3d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 17h |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 1d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
EBITDA growth is more of a “sure thing” in that the EBITDA of a company cannot be argued (ignoring crazy run-rate / pro forma adjustments for the concept here) whereas the multiple applied to EBITDA for valuation is ultimately subject to the whims of the market and therefore is harder to forecast / rely on, especially in an LBO where your model is looking at an exit 5+ years out
Really helpful and makes sense - thank you!
Agree with the above. EBITDA growth is perceived to be more due to the "skill of the investor" rather than multiple expansion which can be impacted by different macro factors, etc.
If you dig up the most recent Bain PE returns report (can't remember the exact name of it), you can see the returns attribution work they did and basically the entire PE industry has experienced massive multiple expansion over the past decade. Is that really due to the "skill" of the PE industry or was that a result of lower interest rates, the general melt-up in markets everywhere, etc.
EBITDA growth is what a given PE fund has the most direct control/influence on.
EBITDA growth is a standardized metric that everyone uses for the most part.
Omnis quia esse id architecto nobis inventore. Quo reprehenderit non nesciunt. Quasi quam officia ut officiis laudantium. Temporibus alias a expedita facilis.
Aspernatur et voluptatem itaque voluptas culpa consequuntur expedita. Minima omnis consequatur dolorum atque et ducimus et. Eaque accusamus ut ut dignissimos alias ad velit soluta. Deserunt quia porro totam quam aut nisi. Atque nihil vel ut quia enim culpa labore.
Id enim eum assumenda fugiat. Qui cupiditate tenetur fugiat debitis eos neque.
Delectus eaque optio provident sed. Et tempora iure illum sint sunt. Corporis quidem asperiores possimus veniam neque. Ratione voluptas ut sequi aut adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...