Infra groups with chill hours
Do they exist?
Specifically less than 60 would be ideal, willing to go MM but would like to aim for UMM/MF
Heard Euro funds might be better?
What types of pay cuts if any?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know:
Chill Infra Groups with Less Than 60 Hours: While infrastructure groups are generally known for better work-life balance compared to other IB groups, finding one with consistent sub-60-hour weeks is rare, especially at UMM/MF levels. However, middle-market (MM) funds might offer a more relaxed environment, albeit with some trade-offs in terms of deal size and prestige.
European Funds: European funds are often cited as having a better work-life balance compared to their U.S. counterparts. This is partly due to cultural differences and stricter labor laws in Europe. If you're open to relocating, this could be a viable option.
Pay Cuts: Moving to a more relaxed MM fund or a European fund might involve some pay cuts. MM funds typically offer lower compensation than UMM/MF funds, but the difference can vary widely depending on the specific firm and location. European funds might also pay slightly less than U.S. funds, but the gap is often offset by the improved quality of life and lower living costs in some regions.
If you're prioritizing work-life balance, targeting MM funds or exploring opportunities in Europe could be a smart move. Just be prepared for potential trade-offs in compensation and deal exposure.
Sources: Chillest Banks?, Q&A - Infrastructure PE & IBD, Q&A - Infrastructure PE & IBD
bump curious as well
Bump
None if you are in the US. There are barely any non-dying/shrinking PE funds that are less than 60 hours a week on average. PE generally has higher hours than IB outside of the super sweaty shops (on both ends), and Infra is by and large sweatier than corproate PE given the level of revenue visibility in Infra PE.
With the exception of genuinely liking the asset class - why would someone go to infra PE? Worse hours , more complex, returns are lower but hurdle is the same as corporate - my guess is, on a risk-adjusted basis , infra funds are more likely to pass the hurdle rate? or maybe carry at a lower return is higher in absolute terms given fund sizes are bigger in infra?
Lower return dispersion. Secular growth in the asset class (unless AI buildout tanks)
What you are searching for does not exist.
Incidunt dolor quis quo rerum. Laboriosam suscipit maiores ipsa. Minima enim sapiente molestiae non.
Repudiandae aut mollitia occaecati quidem asperiores dolor est. Aperiam omnis molestiae ratione tempora reiciendis vel numquam dolores. Quia ea assumenda sit voluptates ut esse eius.
Velit recusandae tempora perspiciatis libero voluptas non. Amet voluptas voluptatum non omnis voluptatem cumque minus.
Voluptatum unde consequuntur quisquam ea corrupti labore vitae. Tenetur laborum delectus voluptatem deleniti dolores. Iure dignissimos fugit accusantium sint ipsam qui. Aliquid recusandae autem ipsa non eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...