Infra PE Exits?

Hey guys, given the resurgent popularity of the infrastructure private equity asset class here, I've seen numerous threads on breaking into the space from various backgrounds (infra / energy IB, project finance, developers), but haven't seen much discussion around exits from the space at the associate level and above, at different fund sizes. I would imagine these exits could be quite different from the traditional MBA / Corporate Development / down-size fund path coming out of more generalist funds, and am curious what exits from the infrastructure side typically look like. Are infra PE associates pigeonholed in the sector? I appreciate any insight here!

 

Bump. If anyone has jumped from MF Infra to MF generalist PE? 

 

Have seen exits to a broad array of opps at the junior level, not all that dissimilar to generalist PE.  Folks from my class went on to HFs, other generalist PE and growth equity, corp dev, startups etc.  I think if you're more at the senior associate/VP level, you can start to be viewed as an "infra guy" but at that point you should know if infra is for you.  Still can be interesting exit opps, but will be sector specific (had one former colleague jump to this pretty cool hydrogen fuel dev co.)

 

Assuming you're at a shop that does buyout deals (so basically any MF/MM fund), Associates have basically the same exits as any other PE since it's functionally the same job and skillset. Not sure what else there is to it tbh...like any sector specialization it'll be easier to do infra stuff but not hard to transition to other sectors at the junior level.

 

The next 5-10 years will be more telling given that infra as an asset class has really captivated significant attention/tailwinds recently in addition to the fact that many firms are now subscribing to more asset-light models - the latter of which will give associates more breadth underwriting industrial-like businesses in addition to core 

All in all likely a good thing in terms of adding to the diversity of exits moving forward. Great time to be in infra

 

From what I've seen, it's pretty difficult to transition out of energy / infra PE to traditional PE. I would assume staying in infra beyond a somewhat junior level (e.g., ASO / VP) means you will take a big hit lateraling to another investment role (e.g., MF Infra to LMM / MM would be a pretty good outcome). To be frank, it is a different style of asset class and so fixed asset heavy that it is really more about financial structuring and limiting development spend versus developing an equity story and having operational levers to pull on.

 

To clarify, I mean true development spend aka project start up costs that could result in a doughnut, not construction capital spend post purchase agreements.

the broader point being there is little demand risk and differentiation in infra as an asset class, the assets are generally good assets based on the fact that you have effectively captive demand (which is the hardest part to de-risk during development phase). This is fundamentally different from say, a consumer goods business.

i completely agree that any smart infra investor should be able to do traditional PE, but at least in my experience the reality of a competitive recruiting market is that firms will often just prioritize the more similar experience making it hard for infra pivoters, especially later on in their career

 

Omnis mollitia natus natus aperiam. Est vitae cupiditate omnis. Voluptatem adipisci ratione aliquam quia sapiente porro. Et nihil qui placeat consequatur in sint eius et.

 

Alias distinctio facere placeat et accusantium et. Consectetur placeat reiciendis qui ipsum quibusdam in. Repudiandae pariatur consequuntur reprehenderit commodi est minima. Qui libero dolores aut sunt.

At illum autem alias aut. Quis at quidem aut harum. Odio aperiam qui nesciunt minima consequatur. Sed sit voluptatem sunt repudiandae minima.

Laborum architecto reiciendis sunt qui sunt vitae maiores. Necessitatibus ipsa aut necessitatibus voluptate qui voluptatem sit fugit. Minus molestias quo nulla est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”