Investment Memos?

Do people at the MFs actually have to write detailed investment memos, with real analysis, growth and continuous improvement strategies, proprietary industry research, etc. of the companies they are acquiring…

or do the partners just want you to scrap a few pages together just to say you did and YOLO it?

Edit: Not trying to be an ass, but feel my firm is behind and am trying to gauge how far behind we are.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

MF PE. The "executive summary" from my last IC memo was 25 pages. I actually like our decks a lot, quite comprehensive.

Is there a rationale behind that 25 page executive summary? Beause that feels neither executive nor like a summary

Remember, always be kind-hearted.
 

Agree with this comment on overkill. A Partner at my MF said that if you can't explain what the investment is and why we should do it in one page, you don't know the investment enough. I very much agree.

Having had a mid-level person have me work on a 80 page deck just to have it killed very quickly was demonstrative of that.

 

Not at a MF but we have around $40bn AUM. Our IC memos are typically PowerPoint, 20 pages or less (including appendix) at all deal stages. It can be frustrating sometimes because we try to make them fairly visual and it is actually extremely difficult to pare down the information to the most important points within that page limit. I'd also argue that the PPT structure is less effective at allowing you to convey nuance, and allows you to gloss over important considerations. Luckily our teams don't try to abuse it and "sneak one by" our committee, but in a more toxic environment I could certainly imagine it happening.

 
Most Helpful

MF PE. Final IC Memos are typically ~2-4 pages of Word write-up summarizing the situation, key investment highlights, risks and mitigants, and valuation; ~20-25 .ppt slides, and ~3-5 pages of model outputs. All in pack is typically ~30-35 pages, excluding appendix / back-pocket materials / Q&A responses.

Our IC is incredibly quantitative / data-driven and only one hour long, so there is really no space at all for fluff or long summaries of DD reports nobody reads. It's 100% analysis and outputs. 

Intermediate IC briefings (e.g. before putting in a non-binding offer to a Board) are ~20-25 pages.

Intro packs for select IC members (e.g. ahead of submitting Round I bids) have a hard cap at 15 pages (incl. word, slides, model). 

 

Mostly depends on intensity of Q&A and supporting documentation. Appendices and back-pocket themselves are rarely over 10-15 pages long, but if you get intense Q&A questions from multiple committee members the weekend before IC, you can end up with 20-30 pages in Q&A response alone. 

 

Very interesting to hear coming from a MF. In growth rn and our ICs are basically the same as you laid out at each stage.

Don't break yourself on the way to making yourself
 

If I had to guess it'd be either due to (a) nobody actually reading the memos or (b) a CYA mindset vs. let-me-convince-the-billionaire-founder-to-deploy-$1Bn-in-60-minutes mindset

 

UMM Infra PE. IC's formally split up into three stages (initial screening, NBO stage and final binding offer stage), with interim briefings in between.

All done in ppt, slides capped at 7 for screening and 25 for each other stage excluding appendices - but Partners/IC are instructed to stop reading after slide 25. At our shop we are heavy on having sidebars with partners/IC during the DD process so absolutely nothing is new to them at final IC, and it's just a procedural meeting almost and to formally minute.

I fully agree that if you are churning out huge decks, you either don't understand the business or are a very poor communicator. Was at a shop like this before and very much prefer our style of doing things.

 

MM PE with memos that are at most 20 slides or so. Not a lot of fluff and it is largely used to update the team on the transaction, key analysis, and our investment thesis. At a larger firm, it’s just accepted that most people likely aren’t going to read some 50 page detailed memo in its entirety before IC. We do extensive analysis but it doesn’t necessarily all get squeezed into a memo. I prefer this method because it forces me to know the deal that much better when getting asked questions instead of handing people a book with the answers they won’t look at and ask the same questions anyway.

 

Deal team developed 40-50 page IC memos with a due diligence deck on the drive with ~150+ slides summarizing our diligence.
 

Definitely feels like a more “boil the ocean” / CYA method relative to other firms. Senior investment team members have a hard time boiling down the thesis to its critical points. 
 

We actually had an initiative to use less words in our memos to get to the point. Slides still had 100’s of words each. 
 

>$1B latest fund

 

MM PD fund; 2 stage IC, 1st stage 2-pager, or 15 page memo. Final is 30 pages. Word format. 

 

Previously at MF PE where our structure was:

  • Pre R1 Bid / Spending “Real” DD Money:  ~20 page deck, overview of biz / industry, investment thesis / risks, valuation, post R1 DD plan
  • Pre R2 Bid: ~5-10 page deck on key updates (i.e., main DD findings from work discussed in first deck, any change to valuation, any deal specific issues to discuss / flag)

Format would be to have a partners meeting with everyone and then when you got the thumbs up you’d have the IC with founders / senior partners. Decent amount of one-off discussions so usually wouldn’t have lots of surprises by the actual meetings

 

How would the budget request process work if you only meet twice?

 

LMM PE where our memos are typically 80-110 pages. Extreme overkill and highly inefficient. Leeds to some very late nights especially when you already know whether or not IC likes the deal at that point. And god forbid there is co-invest involved where you will have to turn those materials into basically a CIM for marketing

 

Not sure what is better - slide decks or word memos? Beauty of word docs is that you do not need to worry about design I guess

 

My fund uses word doc, which I feel optimizes conveyance of the deal with better precision. It also forces you to prepare complete sentences and use proper grammar whereas PPT allows you to gloss over information with BS bullet points to “fill the page”.

I know one particular fund where they like to have IC memos to be as long as possible (with a “table of contents” for each sub-section of the memo) because the managing partner is a complete dumbass and wants to look “detail oriented” in front of his LPs who don’t yet know he’s retarded.

I don’t want to give out names but said managing partner was also on a reality tv show and it’s laughable how he carries himself on the show.

 

Laborum sapiente non corrupti et quia earum. Voluptatem nesciunt eum velit magni architecto rem magnam. Quisquam molestiae quia ipsa.

Ut enim repellendus cupiditate sequi beatae eveniet. Voluptatem ut iste eaque vel nisi dolor et. Ad non hic dolore deleniti aspernatur sint dolorem.

Ea laborum nam sit iusto accusamus quia nisi eveniet. Explicabo quia occaecati ut autem et laudantium eos. Maiores voluptates ut explicabo est. Quia rerum est excepturi hic architecto. Aut ad impedit iusto officiis ut ut repudiandae. Deleniti nihil maxime quasi excepturi cupiditate soluta nihil asperiores. Fugit qui officia rerum tempora ipsam.

 

Ratione error non nisi aut quis enim est. Id eveniet error aut. Ipsam eligendi tempore soluta voluptatem quia blanditiis. Et aut tempore ut est aut. Totam ipsa assumenda ex voluptatibus non. Quia ut voluptatibus commodi sit quidem quis.

Mollitia qui deleniti deleniti. Minus suscipit dolore sint aut error tenetur magnam suscipit. Quia maiores aut tempora consequatur voluptate est harum.

Repellendus sequi placeat accusamus amet. Perspiciatis vel doloremque natus minima assumenda aperiam. Recusandae iste dolorem est necessitatibus aut. Reprehenderit cumque dolorem eum sit magnam eveniet et officiis. Aliquid vero aliquam mollitia saepe sit ducimus. Alias et exercitationem voluptas et sed. Porro soluta nesciunt et iste soluta veniam qui.

Dolorum et fugiat velit eaque dolores praesentium incidunt. Qui cumque ut adipisci consequuntur voluptates distinctio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”