LBO Model Tests Common Mistakes

Let's compile and share some mistakes we've made in past, seen others make, or common things we've seen on LBO model tests.

Examples: 

  • Not subtracting min cash from debt available for optional repayment
  • Forgetting management rollover
  • Add-on acquisitions
4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some common mistakes and pitfalls in LBO model tests that candidates often encounter:

  1. Not Subtracting Minimum Cash: Forgetting to account for minimum cash when calculating debt available for optional repayment is a frequent error. Always ensure you leave the required cash buffer.

  2. Forgetting Management Rollover: Overlooking management equity rollover can lead to incorrect equity calculations. This is a critical component in many LBO scenarios.

  3. Add-On Acquisitions: Failing to model add-on acquisitions properly, such as not incorporating flexible toggles for timing, size, or impact on returns, can result in an incomplete or inaccurate model.

  4. Debt Schedule Formulas: Errors in debt repayment formulas, such as MIN/MAX debt repayment logic, can throw off the entire model. Practice these until they become second nature.

  5. OID and Amortization: Misplacing or forgetting to capitalize Original Issue Discount (OID) on the balance sheet and amortizing it over the debt's life is a common oversight.

  6. Incorrect Leverage Ratios: Miscalculating leverage ratios due to errors in Adjusted EBITDA or debt figures can lead to flawed assumptions and conclusions.

  7. Overcomplicating the Model: Including unnecessary details like asset step-ups, NOLs, or overly complex balance sheet items can waste time and confuse the test's purpose.

  8. Sensitivity Analysis: Neglecting to build out sensitivities for key assumptions (e.g., purchase price, exit multiple, leverage) can make your model less robust and less insightful.

  9. Exit Strategy Missteps: Failing to align the exit multiple with realistic market conditions or not considering the impact of multiple expansion/contraction on returns.

  10. Cash Flow Mismanagement: Misjudging cash flow generation and its allocation (e.g., debt repayment vs. reinvestment) can lead to unrealistic projections.

  11. Not Backing Up Assumptions: Presenting assumptions without data or benchmarks to support them can weaken your case during interviews.

  12. Ignoring Key Value Drivers: Overlooking levers like revenue growth, margin expansion, or working capital improvements that drive equity returns in an LBO.

  13. Rambly Explanations: When presenting your model, being long-winded or unclear can detract from your analysis. Keep explanations concise and focused.

To avoid these mistakes, practice building LBO models from scratch, review precedent models, and ensure you understand the logic behind every input and formula. For more structured learning, consider resources like the WSO LBO Modeling Course, which offers over 110 lessons and practical examples.

Sources: Top Financial Modeling Courses - List of Top Financial Analyst Courses, Creating own LBO assumptions, NEW Financial Modeling Training Courses, NEW Financial Modeling Training Courses, LBOs - Why repay debt instead of keeping cash flow?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

If you could elaborate as to how this is dealt with in a model, that would be really helpful. cheers

Also is this stub period? - heard this mentioned a few times and sounds similar.

 

Numquam et rerum ea nihil adipisci blanditiis libero. Modi suscipit beatae nihil officiis reprehenderit ratione. Cumque et fuga explicabo autem sunt explicabo dolor. Qui officia exercitationem placeat dignissimos natus. Eveniet vel quis mollitia rerum et.

Sit architecto facere quos vel ipsa non. Nihil nesciunt tenetur ab culpa eligendi et. Assumenda quisquam pariatur quaerat ullam assumenda. Sunt et dolor et at enim vel enim.

Qui ut dignissimos asperiores et rerum eum eaque. Nam voluptates voluptatem dolor nulla est laudantium. Fugit harum et ea ad voluptates est aut. Odio dicta autem quia ducimus deleniti. Est tenetur ut et in laudantium. Sapiente ratione et adipisci excepturi sit minima et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (274) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”