LMM PE Return Attribution
What are your sources of returns? With transaction multiples so high for quality platform investments, how are your firms generating 20%+ IRR? What does your typical return attribution table look like?
What are your sources of returns? With transaction multiples so high for quality platform investments, how are your firms generating 20%+ IRR? What does your typical return attribution table look like?
| +60 | Working on Juneteenth | 35 | 1d |
| +25 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 2d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 16h |
| +19 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 4 | 16h |
| +15 | Healthcare PE | 6 | 2d |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 15 | 5h |
| +12 | LMM groups within larger platforms? | 1 | 6d |
| +11 | Reality of the move from LMM to MM | 2 | 5d |
| +9 | MBA and Private Equity | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Free LBO calculator: value bridge, sensitivities, formula-linked Excel export | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
For LMM PE exits the two drivers of Revenue/EBITDA growth and multiple arb seem to still hold up. Part of the reason is that some of these companies were bought over the past few years when multiples hadn’t run up. While new portfolio companies are seeing some multiple increase on entry there are still pockets of proprietary deals where prospects for multiple arb remain. Agree with you that the risk is that multiple arb will be a smaller part of the value bridge so companies may need to be held longer, lowering IRR.
What are you seeing in terms of higher entry multiple vs the past?
Proprietary deal flow is certainly the best source of appropriately priced businesses. It seems like there are a lot more LMM M&A advisors running competitive auctions where the multiples are 8x+. This certainly was the case leading into COVID and seems to have remained.
That's good to know. I think that longer term trend (smaller advised companies) will put some pressure on the multiple arb part of the value bridge for LMM PE.
FWIW bigger PE deals have started to put a more cov-lite leverage into their companies to compensate for increasing multiples. Not sure whether the same can be done as lenders probably see smaller companies as riskier.
Impedit ea dolores ratione. Et et porro sed beatae consequatur architecto consequatur.
Totam voluptate eos eum et eum ut. Vel provident quis atque.
Vel et repellendus est consequatur fugit repudiandae. Dolor animi magni sint. Nam qui provident dolorum cupiditate voluptatibus quia. Nihil dolor perferendis dolor consequuntur.
Eum molestiae et illum asperiores animi inventore. Et excepturi aut debitis impedit. Nihil dicta voluptatum amet nobis. Et voluptatem maxime sunt consequatur. Officia quod nam adipisci unde dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...