London Secondaries Master

Starting a thread for anyone in / looking to break into London secondaries.

Both from the advisory and buyside.

Topics for discussion:
- Recruitment
- Transitioning from one side to the other
- Annual comp
- Different team cultures
- London in Europe

30 Comments
 

a) GP Led

b) depends - im on 5 CV deals atm and only 2 are with true trophy assets ie single asset CVs. For these, we have had to be careful wrt the prospective LPs we go out to as the typical traits of the trophy asset means the LPs will then begin comparing like for like opportunities; turning it into a buyers market where they can choose the deals they want to pursue ie one deal or the other (in my case of the 2 trophy asset deals i am on). That said, there is enough variety to ensure a somewhat varied list of names every time (c50-75% of the LP lists are the same) When a deal is good, everyone will want a bite, when it is shit, no one will be interested - bit of herd mentality as buyers always ask "is there an anchor?" if they are on the fence

On the advisor front, the same usual suspects are in every process - EVR, CL, UBS are the main players but there other players like WB, Asante, Rede, MOE, LAZ, DC, HL etc that come in. My firm has a strong angle to win deals and so we rarely lose the bakeoffs we choose to enter. But on the whole, it is a pretty competitive market

c) WLB is ok - very little to no weekend work, but weekdays can be 4ams. That said, start time is like 8:30 and average leaving time for me is c. 10/10:30 and maybe another 30 mins of work when i get home (all in all, finish at around 12/12:30. 

d) yh primaries is bullshit - basically an email machine and outsourced executive assistant. I couldn't give a fuck about scheduling some IR team's meetings and being an outsourced bitch tbh - secondaries is M&A lite - a deal focused environment with less sweat, better pay and still enough action to keep me coming back. That said, M&A was more 'fun' in the sense that you really were in the trenches but would come out with great experiences / learnings - primaries is not technical at all and after a fundraise, you have no real transferable skills to show for it. Secondaries is similar to M&A in the sense that you at least have something to show for your efforts and something transferable should you want to move to the buyside

 

Anonymous Monkey:

a) GP Led



b) depends - im on 5 CV deals atm and only 2 are with true trophy assets ie single asset CVs. For these, we have had to be careful wrt the prospective LPs we go out to as the typical traits of the trophy asset means the LPs will then begin comparing like for like opportunities; turning it into a buyers market where they can choose the deals they want to pursue ie one deal or the other (in my case of the 2 trophy asset deals i am on). That said, there is enough variety to ensure a somewhat varied list of names every time (c50-75% of the LP lists are the same) When a deal is good, everyone will want a bite, when it is shit, no one will be interested - bit of herd mentality as buyers always ask "is there an anchor?" if they are on the fence



On the advisor front, the same usual suspects are in every process - EVR, CL, UBS are the main players but there other players like WB, Asante, Rede, MOE, LAZ, DC, HL etc that come in. My firm has a strong angle to win deals and so we rarely lose the bakeoffs we choose to enter. But on the whole, it is a pretty competitive market



c) WLB is ok - very little to no weekend work, but weekdays can be 4ams. That said, start time is like 8:30 and average leaving time for me is c. 10/10:30 and maybe another 30 mins of work when i get home (all in all, finish at around 12/12:30. 



d) yh primaries is bullshit - basically an email machine and outsourced executive assistant. I couldn't give a fuck about scheduling some IR team's meetings and being an outsourced bitch tbh - secondaries is M&A lite - a deal focused environment with less sweat, better pay and still enough action to keep me coming back. That said, M&A was more 'fun' in the sense that you really were in the trenches but would come out with great experiences / learnings - primaries is not technical at all and after a fundraise, you have no real transferable skills to show for it. Secondaries is similar to M&A in the sense that you at least have something to show for your efforts and something transferable should you want to move to the buyside


How long do you see syndication taking? Despite the herd mentality, perceive it is very tough

 

Analyst 3+ in IB - Cov

a) GP Led

b) depends - im on 5 CV deals atm and only 2 are with true trophy assets ie single asset CVs. For these, we have had to be careful wrt the prospective LPs we go out to as the typical traits of the trophy asset means the LPs will then begin comparing like for like opportunities; turning it into a buyers market where they can choose the deals they want to pursue ie one deal or the other (in my case of the 2 trophy asset deals i am on). That said, there is enough variety to ensure a somewhat varied list of names every time (c50-75% of the LP lists are the same) When a deal is good, everyone will want a bite, when it is shit, no one will be interested - bit of herd mentality as buyers always ask "is there an anchor?" if they are on the fence

On the advisor front, the same usual suspects are in every process - EVR, CL, UBS are the main players but there other players like WB, Asante, Rede, MOE, LAZ, DC, HL etc that come in. My firm has a strong angle to win deals and so we rarely lose the bakeoffs we choose to enter. But on the whole, it is a pretty competitive market

c) WLB is ok - very little to no weekend work, but weekdays can be 4ams. That said, start time is like 8:30 and average leaving time for me is c. 10/10:30 and maybe another 30 mins of work when i get home (all in all, finish at around 12/12:30. 

d) yh primaries is bullshit - basically an email machine and outsourced executive assistant. I couldn't give a fuck about scheduling some IR team's meetings and being an outsourced bitch tbh - secondaries is M&A lite - a deal focused environment with less sweat, better pay and still enough action to keep me coming back. That said, M&A was more 'fun' in the sense that you really were in the trenches but would come out with great experiences / learnings - primaries is not technical at all and after a fundraise, you have no real transferable skills to show for it. Secondaries is similar to M&A in the sense that you at least have something to show for your efforts and something transferable should you want to move to the buyside

Thanks for the useful answers. Curious to hear how you find the work in Secondaries advisory compared with M&A - do you think it's as interesting? 

Your hours sound pretty long, would you you say they are typical of PCA or are you at a sweatier shop? And would say overall better hours than M&A?

Thanks

 
Most Helpful

IMO secondaries is not as interesting as M&A - M&A is more dynamic, more technical, less process, big personalities, good intensity - but way more stress and a lot of intensity (which is also can be bad) etc. Deals are run the same as M&A eg there is a model (waterfall analysis) an IM, a VDR etc you still commission DD etc 

PCA is sometimes an afterthought, as the PCA comes in after price has effectively been set (ie from the M&A) and so then its a discussion on GP roll and new vehicle commit in addition to discounts/premium for incoming LPs. So no real valuation work in secondaries, instead more so on structuring and negotiation. Opportunity for juniors to actually do a fair amount of work on a deal (I am for example working directly alongside the global heads of sectors for a MF atm) so that is good - lots of learning opportunities.

The main thing is that secondaries fees are far larger than M&A fees on a transaction eg a 100m deal in my former M&A shop (a tier 1 EU EB for my sector) would warrant a 2-3m fee. The same for my current secondaries firm would have a range of 4.5-10m and we would have co-invest opportunities. Getting paid more, for less work, less stress and greater learning opportunity at the cost of less transferable technical skills... In my eyes, as long as the shit exit environment with lagging valuations continues, secondaries will easily be my home (on the advisory side at least) for the next few years.  

I think my hours are standard - its def not like a sweatshop given its significantly less than my previous M&A role

 

MF PE Analyst in London looking for a move in Secondaries here.

GS is the undisputed top dog in secondaries in London followed by BX, others are really miles behind as far as dealflow and returns go…

 

Curious to hear more, I based my comment on a mix of data from friends at the shops you mentioned and Pitchbook.

From what I’ve seen/heard, Alpinvest is doing a lot of LP led stuff, Neuberger has had issues deploying/raising Capital in EMEA and Lexington’s returns have been far from stellar…

Conscious that BX is also focusing on LP deals, meanwhile GS’ latest fund is marked at a 1.9x MoM/16% IRR

 

How are you all seeing comp progression? After your year 3/4/5, did what you get match expectations? Any places worth calling out for their practices?

 

Anonymous Monkey:

im getting paid above street for my title on the base - lets see what bonus says come H1 26. Pay structure can be different though ie some PCAs offer co-invest  alongside base and bonus 


You mean investing in the CVs you advise on right? Wouldn’t you always take cash?

Did you negotiate this or just the shop? Do you feel like this has historically impacted your bonus because you have a higher base vs others in th team?

 

Enim voluptatem voluptate ducimus aperiam suscipit. Sunt consectetur quod architecto eveniet et et. Quia recusandae expedita atque facilis eaque ullam reprehenderit et.

Fugit ut ut velit reiciendis. Iure numquam amet quia similique. Neque nemo quisquam unde voluptas natus beatae autem. Eum assumenda omnis ratione quod nam fugiat. Ut consequatur qui rem numquam reprehenderit delectus quod.

Fuga quidem veritatis earum placeat laudantium. Ea nihil dolores animi animi debitis.

 

Eum ut eveniet molestiae maiores in et autem. Quis ullam nihil ab. Et eos recusandae expedita est fugiat.

Eum ut quae consequuntur nostrum quibusdam quia expedita. Perspiciatis atque labore aspernatur sed.

Eius itaque magnam sit. Rerum est qui ut saepe architecto labore accusamus aut. Dignissimos ea ut placeat atque et sed laborum. Aspernatur voluptatibus atque qui voluptas quam. Ut quos nisi laborum molestias quia et ipsum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”