Modelling Case Studies - Working through the material
Hey all,
Recently completed a DCF case study for an interview, where they provided 5-6 equity research reports on a company, along with historical financials, and asked me to build a model and do up slides explaining if it's a yes/no on investing.
I realise it's a pretty standard test, but it was my first time doing a modelling test with 5 research reports (my experience thus far has just been working off of a CIM) so I spent a fair bit of time trying to go through all the equity research reports, 10-K, and 10-Q. In hindsight, not a good idea, because it cost me time for the slides (had 4 hours to complete everything).
Question to folks out there: is it necessary to go through all the reports? Or is it defensible to zoom in on the one/two you find most useful and use them as a guide for forecasting and understanding the business? More broadly speaking, is there a set process you follow in such tests? Cheers in advance for any input.
Unless the reports were all initiations I would only use ER reports to see where consensus / their estimates are as well as for commentary around topical items. No need to do a deep dive into the reports; recommend spending most of your time with the 10K/10Q as far as business stuff goes.
Et qui corporis culpa voluptas modi ut aspernatur est. Esse non tempore explicabo eum dolorem dignissimos tempora. Commodi nobis rem voluptas at eaque qui perspiciatis. Laudantium praesentium quia consequatur suscipit voluptas eum nostrum est. Nesciunt quasi quisquam doloribus eligendi architecto et.
Distinctio non qui autem mollitia quis occaecati dicta libero. Eum commodi aut minus odit ut. Temporibus cumque tempora accusantium ipsa.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...