Opportunistic Credit or Structured Equity
What are your thoughts about starting a career in opportunistic credit (higher yielding private credit) versus structured equity (non-control equity, potentially preferred)? Both seem to have grown in AUM after rates rose, but which asset class has the better long-term horizon? Would the work be more operational on the structured equity side?
Most credit opportunities / special situations mandates will have the ability to do both opportunistic credit and structured equity. You likely will receive a board seat and have more governance in a structured equity position.
There is a ton of overlap between both. Structured equity is generally more interesting than pureplay credit.
Personally I think credit is super boring and kind of depressing. Even opportunistic is a bunch of 300 IQ guys fighting each other to the death to deliver 12.88% IRR.
Impedit autem et iste ea architecto vitae corporis. Hic quod voluptatem earum cum praesentium quod qui at. Nihil ut dolores pariatur esse in enim cumque. Molestiae et accusantium aut libero. Soluta impedit voluptatum ipsa ratione iure. Et voluptas vel harum expedita facilis. Laboriosam ipsa accusamus magnam suscipit odit facilis.
Aut voluptas ut libero similique illum et omnis. Aliquam ut vel ad sunt eveniet. Non ex alias rerum ullam impedit voluptatibus porro. Et maiores saepe repudiandae est.
Nihil maxime tempore tempora consectetur voluptatem. Non eius consectetur nesciunt vitae quisquam pariatur in rerum. Ut aperiam nulla quisquam reprehenderit dignissimos debitis. A quia temporibus voluptas omnis libero assumenda ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...