PE CIM Case Studies
Curious what peoples approach to 2 - 4 hr CIM Case Studies are and the order in which they tackle things. I generally read the executive summary --> Read the Financials --> Skim rest of CIM to get an idea of assumptions --> Model --> Comeback and read rest of CIM and fine tune assumptions --> Investment Memo/Presentation.
I feel like I am sometimes inefficient and curious how people normally structure these cases. For the model portion, assuming enough info is provided, how detailed do you make your assumptions? Do you do a full revenue build even if not explicity asked or a simple growth assumption? Also how do you generally go about deciding the best assumptions? For growth I will generally straight line at or slightly below the industry CAGR as a base case, then for margins and WC items, unless there is an obvious trend or reason for improvement I will keep the same as the year 0.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a structured approach to tackling 2-4 hour CIM (Confidential Information Memorandum) case studies:
Approach to CIM Case Studies
Initial Reading:
Skimming for Assumptions:
Model Building:
Fine-Tuning:
Investment Memo/Presentation:
Detailed Assumptions
Growth Assumptions:
Margins and Working Capital:
Efficiency Tips
By following this structured approach, you can efficiently tackle CIM case studies and ensure that your models are both detailed and accurate.
Sources: DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, My PE Recruiting Process, Associate guide on analyzing an income statement, How to convert sell-side models to your own models faster?
Bump
Here's what I do - I compartmentalize into building blocks, because reading a CIM without a clear direction of what you're looking for is a total time waste.
Not the OP, but what’s the thought process on a more detailed model? On a 3hr case, I like to spend 75 mins max on the model (simple SF + very basic base case) as I view this as more check the box. Usually I like to spend at least 30-45mins on the memo as I feel like being more thoughtful here around highlights / risks + additional areas of DD is better but curious to hear the opposing side
I mean you can bang out sell-side case LBO in maybe 30-40 min with revenue growth and % revenue drivers, meaning you should still have another 30-40 minutes to make refinements on a basic revenue build that you can sensitize and point to for the write-up. This is assuming you’re not fucking around with more than 2 tranches of debt or doing anything more than basic LBO. Also, if they don’t specify a balance sheet then I don’t care enough to make one other than debt and maybe NWC, but you don’t even always get that info.
I feel like this still falls into the 75 minute range, but a few more details on drivers make your write-up look a little smarter.
Could you explain how you’re thinking about the debt schedule?
Not sure what you mean, but a basic debt schedule is pretty easy if you make it easy. Assume basic revolver, term loan (X% mandatory amort, 100% sweep), maybe sub debt or notes (which notes are the easiest) if they ask for it. I feel like if you've done enough models this should take like 10 min if you don't do balance sheet or anything else that's a total waste of time?
Great framework
thanks
Thx
Here's what I do, to add to what you said about how you make assumptions -
1. for revenue growth, if there's been historical high growth (20%+) or management projects high growth, I might taper it down by 2.5% of 5% per year, because most times most companies can't maintain a very fast growth rate for several years
2. for cost projections as % of revenue, I either keep it the same year 0 or take the average of historical years, depending on what the patterns have looked like in the past few years
3. in general, I just try to put something reasonable (based on the 2 principles above) in the first try, and after I finish the model I will create multiple sensitivity tables to test out/show how variations in a few important assumptions might change investment returns. I think this is the most important part - to see the sensitivty of certain variables, and the range of potential outcomes, rather than to try and make perfect assumptions. if an investment has a "multiple upside cases, no fail case in downside scenario" profile, then I know this is a good deal to underwrite. otherwise, I might say in the investment memo: to underwrite this deal, you really need to believe in the growth potential, etc.
4. one other thing I consider is, to sanity check my assumptions. If my assumptions make IRR incredibly high or low, I adjust them until my IRRs start to look normal for the base case.
Have a few examples of CIMs with cases, can d.m.
Would be greatly appreciated if you have any examples
Could you please share? I’ve done plenty of model tests, but I need cases.
Any chance you would share some of your model tests?
Would be appreciated so much if you could share with me.
would appreciate it if you could share them as well, thank you!
Would you be willing to share with me as well? Thanks vm in advance
Hi, would you be able to share these with me? If so that would be great, thank you!
Hi, Can you share with me as well? Thanks!!
Hi can you share with me as well? Thank you
Would be grateful if you can share some examples with me!
Appreciate if you share any examples. thanks!
DMed! Greatly appreciate your sharing!!
Can you send it as well please? Thanks a lot!
Could you please share? Thanks in advance!
Hi - would be greatly appreciated if you could share with me. thank you!!
Will anyone be open to sharing CIM +Model samples?
Second. Would be very much appreciated.
I have a few, happy to share. Dm me
Can someone please share any test with IM to write case?
Have a few - happy to share / trade. DM me
Hi, Please check your DM
Could you check your inbox Thanks
In aperiam consequuntur delectus consequatur esse deleniti. Pariatur corrupti et voluptates non repudiandae ullam. Laboriosam consequatur occaecati cumque ad non. Ipsum optio quasi facere et enim dolores. Consequatur perspiciatis id consequuntur.
Qui tenetur reprehenderit porro modi. Sunt non esse rerum consequatur et voluptas dolores. Reprehenderit sed ea hic nulla.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Blanditiis aspernatur occaecati vero alias nesciunt ut. Quo explicabo veritatis est reprehenderit voluptatem illum autem soluta. Minima et ratione hic sit. Voluptates odio hic doloribus est et praesentium.
Praesentium deleniti eos perspiciatis ab. Dolores enim aut est dolores eveniet excepturi iusto distinctio. Delectus iste dolor consectetur inventore voluptate saepe.
Velit omnis temporibus consequuntur sit facilis. Consequatur beatae in quisquam commodi aut qui sed nesciunt. Quidem aut dolorem temporibus exercitationem accusantium iusto. Eligendi vel ut aut voluptatem sed.
Et vitae ullam natus vel. Qui aut quis quia. Consequuntur nam quo aliquam at molestias et. Architecto ut eius nesciunt.
Consequuntur aut et placeat at vel fuga ex. Aut assumenda eaque in dolores. Rerum ex doloremque consequatur quos ea et.