PE CIM Case Studies

Curious what peoples approach to 2 - 4 hr CIM Case Studies are and the order in which they tackle things. I generally read the executive summary --> Read the Financials --> Skim rest of CIM to get an idea of assumptions --> Model --> Comeback and read rest of CIM and fine tune assumptions --> Investment Memo/Presentation.

I feel like I am sometimes inefficient and curious how people normally structure these cases. For the model portion, assuming enough info is provided, how detailed do you make your assumptions? Do you do a full revenue build even if not explicity asked or a simple growth assumption? Also how do you generally go about deciding the best assumptions? For growth I will generally straight line at or slightly below the industry CAGR as a base case, then for margins and WC items, unless there is an obvious trend or reason for improvement I will keep the same as the year 0.

43 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a structured approach to tackling 2-4 hour CIM (Confidential Information Memorandum) case studies:

Approach to CIM Case Studies

  1. Initial Reading:

    • Executive Summary: Start by reading the executive summary to get a high-level overview of the company, its operations, and key highlights.
    • Financials: Move on to the financials to understand the company's historical performance, key financial metrics, and any notable trends.
  2. Skimming for Assumptions:

    • Rest of CIM: Skim through the rest of the CIM to identify key assumptions, industry-specific metrics, and any other relevant information that will inform your model.
  3. Model Building:

    • Initial Model: Begin building your model based on the information gathered. Focus on key drivers and assumptions.
    • Revenue Build: Depending on the detail provided and the time available, you can choose between a full revenue build or a simpler growth assumption. A full revenue build might include:
      • Number of store locations
      • Sales per store
      • Units sold
    • Simple Growth Assumption: If time-constrained, use a simple growth assumption, such as straight-lining at or slightly below the industry CAGR.
  4. Fine-Tuning:

    • Detailed Reading: Go back and read the rest of the CIM in detail to refine your assumptions and ensure accuracy.
    • Adjustments: Make necessary adjustments to your model based on the additional information gathered.
  5. Investment Memo/Presentation:

    • Drafting: Prepare your investment memo or presentation, summarizing your findings, key assumptions, and the rationale behind your projections.

Detailed Assumptions

  • Growth Assumptions:

    • Base Case: Straight-line growth at or slightly below the industry CAGR.
    • Revenue Drivers: Identify key drivers such as new customer contracts, market share gains, or increases in unit pricing.
  • Margins and Working Capital:

    • Consistency: Unless there is a clear trend or reason for improvement, keep margins and working capital items consistent with the base year (Year 0).
    • CapEx and Working Capital: Ensure that sales projections are consistent with related assumptions like CapEx and working capital. High revenue growth should be matched with appropriate reinvestment levels.

Efficiency Tips

  • Prioritize Key Sections: Focus on the executive summary and financials first to get a quick understanding.
  • Use Templates: Have a consistent assumption sheet or template that you can quickly adapt to different case studies.
  • Iterative Process: Build your model iteratively, refining assumptions as you gather more information.

By following this structured approach, you can efficiently tackle CIM case studies and ensure that your models are both detailed and accurate.

Sources: DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, My PE Recruiting Process, Associate guide on analyzing an income statement, How to convert sell-side models to your own models faster?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Here's what I do - I compartmentalize into building blocks, because reading a CIM without a clear direction of what you're looking for is a total time waste.

  • Skim exec summary for 5 minutes - basically to see the industry, and to see if there's anything funky about the business model or transaction that isn't a standard LBO (minority txn? weird structure?)
  • Straight to financials, and immediate work on the model. Copy and paste whatever financials are available into excel, and just build the LBO. If it's a standard PE case study, you should be aiming to do this as quickly as possible, and you can literally paste in CIM forecast, and make any standard debt assumptions. Your goal here is to lock down the LBO structure, and to basically do it as quickly and robotically as possible. Basically, you are setting up your template so that you can go and fuck around with drivers later after reading the CIM. This should take hopefully 25-40 minutes.
  • Once you've done the LBO (which will probably give you a nonsensical IRR), THEN you can start thinking about the revenue and cost builds. There should be a section in the CIM regarding business model - is it # stores, is it subscription-based, some sort of volume, etc? Then, you search for the key metrics in the CIM. Many times, you have to impute some figures which is fine. For example, maybe this is a services business that fundamentally operates as # projects X $ per project. CIM usually will mention 1 or the other, so you just impute what's missing. Maybe it's more complicated then that, but you need to build in layers so that you don't run out of time trying to run some stupidly complicated revenue build (e.g., first do projects x $ per project. Then if you've done that quickly, you can split it up into X number of segments if that's important). Do the same for costs, CIM will usually give indication of what's fixed COGS vs. variable COGS vs. Operating costs (usually can just do operating costs as % of revenue and scale it down over time). Then, you add this into the revenue line and make slight adjustments so you can see what the sell-side is "implying" for whatever driver you're focused on. They also usually give a page on their key assumptions so you can test your build and make sure it's consistent. This should take another 30 minutes.
  • Your model should be fundamentally done after this, and the rest is actually reading the damn CIM and developing your base case. Ideally, you have at least another 30min-1 hour for this. As you mention, good base assumptions are triangulated using: close to historical growth (if not, need clear justification), in-line with market growth, very moderate cost scaling, cashflow needs in-line with historicals, etc). Then, slap on an entry and exit multiple that makes the returns somewhat palatable. Then, you sensitize your drivers
  • Not gonna go over the write-up, but you should leave yourself 20min (more if it's a PPT) to clearly articulate investment thesis and risks. For thesis, take the top 3 highlights from the CIM and re-word them from your point of view. This should be easy because bankers usually put 6+ highlights. You can include another angle too if you think it's differentiated ("rare platform in saturated space, potential for M&A, whatever bullshit). For key risks, you can put the standard BS (growing competition, sustainable moat, etc). But you need at least 1-2 key risks that show that you've thought about this. Maybe IRR is highly sensitive to one of your revenue drivers, mention this, and extrapolate what this means in the real world (e.g., sensitive to pricing --> competition and price concessions, maybe macro factors, maybe whatever "moat" they highlight in the CIM is iffy especially if there's a history of pricing volatility)
 

Not the OP, but what’s the thought process on a more detailed model? On a 3hr case, I like to spend 75 mins max on the model (simple SF + very basic base case) as I view this as more check the box. Usually I like to spend at least 30-45mins on the memo as I feel like being more thoughtful here around highlights / risks + additional areas of DD is better but curious to hear the opposing side

 

I mean you can bang out sell-side case LBO in maybe 30-40 min with revenue growth and % revenue drivers, meaning you should still have another 30-40 minutes to make refinements on a basic revenue build that you can sensitize and point to for the write-up. This is assuming you’re not fucking around with more than 2  tranches of debt or doing anything more than basic LBO. Also, if they don’t specify a balance sheet then I don’t care enough to make one other than debt and maybe NWC, but you don’t even always get that info.

I feel like this still falls into the 75 minute range, but a few more details on drivers make your write-up look a little smarter. 

 

Not sure what you mean, but a basic debt schedule is pretty easy if you make it easy. Assume basic revolver, term loan (X% mandatory amort, 100% sweep), maybe sub debt or notes (which notes are the easiest) if they ask for it. I feel like if you've done enough models this should take like 10 min if you don't do balance sheet or anything else that's a total waste of time?

 

Here's what I do, to add to what you said about how you make assumptions -

1. for revenue growth, if there's been historical high growth (20%+) or management projects high growth, I might taper it down by 2.5% of 5% per year, because most times most companies can't maintain a very fast growth rate for several years

2. for cost projections as % of revenue, I either keep it the same year 0 or take the average of historical years, depending on what the patterns have looked like in the past few years

3. in general, I just try to put something reasonable (based on the 2 principles above) in the first try, and after I finish the model I will create multiple sensitivity tables to test out/show how variations in a few important assumptions might change investment returns. I think this is the most important part - to see the sensitivty of certain variables, and the range of potential outcomes, rather than to try and make perfect assumptions. if an investment has a "multiple upside cases, no fail case in downside scenario" profile, then I know this is a good deal to underwrite. otherwise, I might say in the investment memo: to underwrite this deal, you really need to believe in the growth potential, etc.

4. one other thing I consider is, to sanity check my assumptions. If my assumptions make IRR incredibly high or low, I adjust them until my IRRs start to look normal for the base case.

 

In aperiam consequuntur delectus consequatur esse deleniti. Pariatur corrupti et voluptates non repudiandae ullam. Laboriosam consequatur occaecati cumque ad non. Ipsum optio quasi facere et enim dolores. Consequatur perspiciatis id consequuntur.

Qui tenetur reprehenderit porro modi. Sunt non esse rerum consequatur et voluptas dolores. Reprehenderit sed ea hic nulla.

 

Praesentium deleniti eos perspiciatis ab. Dolores enim aut est dolores eveniet excepturi iusto distinctio. Delectus iste dolor consectetur inventore voluptate saepe.

Velit omnis temporibus consequuntur sit facilis. Consequatur beatae in quisquam commodi aut qui sed nesciunt. Quidem aut dolorem temporibus exercitationem accusantium iusto. Eligendi vel ut aut voluptatem sed.

Et vitae ullam natus vel. Qui aut quis quia. Consequuntur nam quo aliquam at molestias et. Architecto ut eius nesciunt.

Consequuntur aut et placeat at vel fuga ex. Aut assumenda eaque in dolores. Rerum ex doloremque consequatur quos ea et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”