PE back to IB…
Thinking of going back to IB. Background is 1.5 years of IB analyst and 2 years at a PE MM fund ($2bn). What title should I shoot for? Associate 1/2/3??
Thinking of going back to IB. Background is 1.5 years of IB analyst and 2 years at a PE MM fund ($2bn). What title should I shoot for? Associate 1/2/3??
Career Resources
Associate 3. Why the switch back?
Would you mind sharing why you're looking to make the move back to IB? I'm an IB analyst looking to transition to PE and would appreciate your perspective
Hours in PE can be just as bad as an associate, with more pressure than being an analyst. There’s is also a lot of unglorious portco work to be done at all times. I like it (much more strategic), but it’s certainly not for everyone. Also, significantly more difficult to be promoted. Way more competition for limited spots. Same dynamic in banking as well, but it’s less pronounced. Banking camaraderie is also much higher (partly due to less competition against your direct peers for a future at the firm).
If you are going back to IB, often a lot of bankers will try and discount your experience in PE. I would aim for a Senior Associate Title so probably an Assoc. 2/3. I would expect to have to do a year as an IB associate prior to any VP promotion.
If you try to go higher than that (VP), I think you will find that you are facing a big uphill battle. but that is just my two cents.
Seems like I am being offered Associate 2 - with the thought being 2 years until VP. Is that a lowball / non starter?
I think that is fair. Depending on the bank, they may struggle giving you more as it could invalidate their own process (i.e 3 year analyst, and 3 year associate programs means someone with 4 YOE is a Assoc. 2 in the program). I think PE experience, is the equal to but not necessarily greater than a banking experience, when moving back to banking. (1) My first comment was to more so say that you should probably not take a Associate 1 level as you should have good reps under your belt. (2)
(1) Personally, I think PE experience is great and if you have interest in investing or capital allocation, you should try and pursue it, but if you leave PE, I would not expect everyone to value it the same on a work experience basis.
(2) This assumes the bank you are interviewing at is a 2 year program.
bro footnoted his own comment
I have almost your exact same situation (almost same fund size and everything), except did 2 years IB, and got offered ASO 2, with promotion by beg. of 2027. They're being pretty fair by making you ASO 2.
Why move back to IB?
Few reasons and anyone who has been through any kind of MM shop in particular likely sympathizes here.
There's more reasons but those come to mind. Once you get past the groupthink of the buyside being everything you realize that IB, if you find a team of people you actually like + solid pipeline is amazing. Of course, if you go to GS or EVR you will want to die, but there are firms that balance things well.
Associate 2 is very fair.
Why go back to IB vs doing something else though? I get why PE is not that great, but do you really want to destroy your life for the next 10+yrs to get to MD and still be working 60hr weeks after that?
I know plenty of people that have done their PE associate stints, hated it and went back into IB and liked it much more. If anything, the stint on the buyside and professional experience / maturity allows you to recruit for the type of bank you actually want to work at - some only wanted to do M&A, others went to private capital advisory, some wanted to change industries, wanted to look for lifestyle groups, etc.
I was in your shoes (similar fund size) and was recruiting for Associate 1 at a few EB/BB platforms but some pushed back asking for 6–9 month "trial" analyst before the AS promotion. One thing is that this was in the UK.
Ultimately ended up doing IB > PE > MBA > IB (also because I used it to relocate to the U.S.)
Made the same move. Didn't really believe in carry. Progression is also less clear in PE. Cash comp is way higher in IB.
In hindsight, should've just sticked with IB all the way
The SMD at my last company straight up told me that carry isn't really a thing during my interview. All it takes is for one deal to go to zero to lose everything. Even if your fund is in the money, you need to deal with mandatory coinvest and fund life extensions. You won't see real money until your late 30s.
Also, when you join a fund, you don't know what shit they're dealing with. They'll lie straight up to your face and say their performance is excellent while simultaneously giving back assets to the bank.
Yup, I've seen people in VP/Principal level going back to IBD also. Carry is real if you joined 15+ years ago. In this current cycle? Most of the returns I've been seeing are coming out of continuation funds = carry rolled over... Unless I want to grind until I'm 50 years old (which I don't) - IBD is better I think.
Any folks that went A2A in IB, did PE and then returned to IB? I would have 2 years as IB analyst + 1.5 years as IB associate + 2 years as PE associate. Would I return to IB as As2/As3 or could I aim for VP1?
VP1 is going to be hard.
I had 1.5y IB + 2y MM PE, and only Moelis was willing to offer Associate. The others wanted me to do 6–12 months as an Analyst.
May be different if you're coming back from UMM/MF, though.
I did this - was able to come back as a VP1. MM however but was in a group I liked and had connections to.
mf
You should be VP
Architecto maiores explicabo magni rerum excepturi. Ipsum accusamus officia iure sed. Non deleniti illum iure tenetur ratione nostrum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Magnam ut voluptatem sunt earum recusandae. Eos blanditiis voluptatibus quibusdam sit quia sit. Aspernatur et ea in non ea numquam totam. Voluptatem iste pariatur nihil dolor eius quae voluptatem voluptate.
Autem quaerat quis et quae. Reiciendis rerum harum ea quia aut repudiandae animi et. Sequi laudantium et exercitationem culpa velit. Non doloremque enim occaecati consequatur.