PE / Buyside Modelling

Hi all


Sorry if this is a dumb question - just wondering what type of modelling is usually done / takes the most time in the buyside / PE? Reason I'm asking is that in the sellside, we spend a lot of time with mgmt on working on the operational model / assumptions and really fleshing out the model to granular line items (more complex than needed..)


When we give it to buyers in Phase I or upload in the VDR - how much / what type of modelling do the buyers spend the most time from the model we give? 


I understand they may probably overlay it with some of their assumptions / inputs and make an IRR / LBO / valuation tab. However on the actual modelling front - would most time be spent on just DDing the various line items and assumptions / understanding how the model works? As imo the bulk of the work of making the 3 statement operational model and revenue / cost builds were already done by the sell side, and I dont think overlaying an LBO tab would take as much time as making the operational model from scratch 


Sorry if a dumb question lol.. thanks

 
Most Helpful

Intern opinion - experienced people can correct me if I'm wrong.

Models with such extreme granularity and 30+ tabs for no reason are usually hated.

Our job is to strip out the BS and see where you made mistakes (e.g. not linked correctly, real driver of sub-segment not identified correctly and has to be function of something else and so on)

For round 1 bid, build own operating model (possibly with the help of buy-side adviser) and input that into the company template LBO. This has low level of granularity and just aims to show the possibility. Very high level model of revenue and cost drivers.
Buy-side adviser might be tasked on adding flexibility in assumptions, figuring out whether lines can be consolidated (to remove your unnecessary complex detail)

For round 2 bid, team builds out more detailed model with or without the help of buy-side adviser. key drivers of everything material, split of head office costs vs division costs and so on.

time-wise hard to say. Usually takes a few hours of work a day over time as discussions progress. It's not the norm for an Associate to sit down and spend 2 days just to build a model.

in any case, the team builds its own model and runs scenarios like Management Case, Management Case with a haircut, Investment Organic Case, Investment case with M&A

edit: more specifically to answer your question - the part you call "IRR / LBO / Valuation" tab is the company template I refer to. Every company has its own LBO template and the operating model goes into that. Buy-side 1) understand how the model works and what the drivers are and whether your model is right, 2) thinks how to simplify, 3) runs few cases as I mentioned (sense check management assumptions, usually management case is bull case).

 

Really depends on fund size, type of deal and fund. 

Sometimes I'll use the sell-side model as the basis to and just overlay the LBO / financing assumptions and add the cases to sensitise, but use the drivers of the sell-side model. 

Sometimes I'll build in a different way because I want to flex different assumptions (e.g., maybe certain things in sell-side model are too granular or not granular enough). Might get buyside to help with this. 

 

Temporibus accusantium voluptatem ipsa quos nisi. Quibusdam repellat cupiditate veniam sunt. Necessitatibus repellendus nisi corrupti aperiam impedit. Consequatur facere iure qui perferendis adipisci dolores. Saepe explicabo voluptas vitae occaecati. Minima ex corrupti impedit in totam. Quis a beatae est fugiat.

Voluptas illo accusamus molestiae. Aliquam voluptatem dolore et dolor illum aliquam. Dolor amet voluptatem eius veniam ipsa quidem. Qui quos consequatur eveniet aut aliquam dolores commodi. Et repellat necessitatibus a molestiae ut.

Molestiae commodi perferendis quisquam dolorum eaque sint non minus. Culpa quaerat nulla nisi ducimus quibusdam. Consequatur eaque neque quas explicabo nemo mollitia. Cumque esse atque aut qui voluptatem sunt fugiat. Voluptatem iste id nemo. Ut deserunt aut tenetur est maxime in quisquam. Ipsa rem assumenda dolore dolorem vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”