pik interest "Tax-deductible" Modeling Treatment Question

Possibly stupid question so apologies in advance. Very depressingly grinding through LBOs right now and had a question regarding "tax-deductible" and "non-tax deductible" treatment in an LBO (really just general modeling purposes).

So my very simplified and convenient understanding, planning to use for modeling tests in interview settings, is that stuff that is non-tax deductible that I generally come across in LBO (like amort of write up of intangibles, pp&e write up in a transaction, or PIK interest) still shows up on the income statement, but there is a deferred tax effect (the pre-tax income on the tax statements would essentially add these "non-tax deductible" items and then create a deferred tax item on the cash flow calc). might be wrong, but that's the logic I've been seeing in sample tests. and perhaps my syntax here isn't so accurate and may be overloading some terms, but that's my understanding of "not tax deductible" generally.

however, i've seen an unnamed widely used LBO resource say that if pik interest in not tax deductible, then it doesnt show up on the IS or CFS altogether? i guess pik debt debits by 10 and equity credits by -10? 

my question really is that if i come across PIK interest as being referred to as non-tax deductible, what is the correct approach without spinning like crazy on it? because im very certain my understanding of the non-tax deductible with regards to things like amort of intangibles or amort of pp&e from a write up is correct. its just the pik interest case that is confusing and where it seems to be overloaded. mb if the post is unclear.

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's the breakdown of your PIK interest modeling question:

  1. PIK Interest and Tax Deductibility:

    • PIK (Payment-in-Kind) interest is typically treated as a non-cash expense that accrues to the principal balance of the debt rather than being paid in cash.
    • Whether PIK interest is tax-deductible depends on the jurisdiction and specific terms of the debt. In many cases, PIK interest is not tax-deductible, which can complicate its treatment in LBO models.
  2. Non-Tax Deductible Items in LBO Models:

    • For non-tax-deductible items like amortization of intangibles or PP&E write-ups, these still appear on the income statement (IS) as expenses, but they do not reduce taxable income. Instead, they create a deferred tax liability (DTL) on the balance sheet, which is adjusted in the cash flow statement (CFS).
    • The logic you described for these items is correct: they impact pre-tax income on the IS but are adjusted for tax purposes, leading to deferred tax effects.
  3. PIK Interest Specific Case:

    • If PIK interest is not tax-deductible, the treatment can vary depending on the modeling approach:
      • Income Statement (IS): PIK interest may not appear on the IS at all because it does not reduce taxable income. Instead, it directly accrues to the debt balance on the balance sheet.
      • Cash Flow Statement (CFS): Since PIK interest is non-cash, it does not directly impact cash flow. However, the increase in the debt balance due to accrued PIK interest will be reflected in the financing section of the CFS.
    • The confusion likely arises because some resources simplify the treatment of PIK interest for interview purposes. In such cases, they might exclude it from the IS entirely to avoid overcomplicating the model.
  4. Correct Approach for Interviews:

    • If PIK interest is non-tax-deductible, the safest approach is:
      • Do not include it on the IS.
      • Reflect the accrual of PIK interest by increasing the debt balance on the balance sheet.
      • Ensure the CFS captures the change in debt due to PIK interest in the financing section.
    • If you're unsure during an interview, you can clarify your assumptions with the interviewer. For example: "I am assuming PIK interest is non-tax-deductible and will not appear on the IS, but it will accrue to the debt balance on the balance sheet."
  5. Key Takeaway:

    • The treatment of PIK interest depends on its tax-deductibility. For non-tax-deductible PIK interest, it typically bypasses the IS and directly impacts the debt balance and CFS. This differs from other non-tax-deductible items like amortization, which still appear on the IS and create deferred tax effects.

By sticking to this framework, you'll avoid spinning in circles and can confidently handle PIK interest in LBO modeling tests. Good luck with your grind—you're on the right track!

Sources: Specialty Lending (GS/TPG) - Any insights?, Top Financial Modeling Courses - List of Top Financial Analyst Courses, NEW Financial Modeling Training Courses, Interest deductibility

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Firstly, in EMEA, PIK interest is generally tax deductible upon accrual. Believe this is also the case in the US (depending on structuring). Ultimately you want to avoid that the PIK is perceived as a disguised dividend. Might also run into issues if it’s provided by a related party. (No legal advice)

In terms of modelling, I would include it in the interest line of the P&L (maybe split it out). You then also include it in the tax workings. But you don’t have it in the cash flow because it’s not a cash effective item. So starting from EBITDA you subtract the cash interest but not the PIK interest. Hope that makes sense.

 
Most Helpful

Laudantium beatae consequatur provident quod rerum et. Reprehenderit qui nemo et animi occaecati minima sed praesentium.

Voluptatum quo necessitatibus quam totam dolorum. Qui sed enim eius. Officiis quia vel sed reiciendis mollitia vel. Deserunt laboriosam dolores totam officiis architecto dicta ut. Aut aut excepturi numquam ut tempora aut. Non vel in placeat et.

Veritatis ut molestiae facilis aliquid. Est quos nesciunt et doloribus et error. Expedita necessitatibus voluptatem dicta enim. Voluptatem porro saepe ut ea.

SOFR+400

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”