infra london
Any insights on Canadian Pension Infra Teams in London? i.e. OMERS, PSP, CPP...
Their culture, working hours, pay, benefits, etc.
Thanks in advance.
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +106 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 14h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 1d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Do you think PE has actually helped you become a better entrepreneur? | 8 | 3h |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 1d |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 4d |
| +16 | Portfolio Marks | 8 | 4h |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 2d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 2d |
| +13 | MF Tech PE 2026 | 2 | 1h |
Career Resources
Based on the most helpful WSO content, there isn't specific detailed information about PSP's infrastructure team in the provided knowledge base. However, Canadian pension funds like PSP are known for being significant players in the infrastructure investment space. If you're looking for insights into culture, hours, and pay, you might find parallels with other Canadian pension funds like OTPP or CPPIB, which are often described as having competitive pay, reasonable hours compared to traditional PE, and a collaborative culture.
For more specific details, you might want to explore threads or discussions directly related to PSP or reach out to professionals in the space for firsthand insights. If you'd like, I can guide you to similar threads or resources. Let me know!
Sources: PWP culture, pay and exits, Infrastructure at Canadian Pensions (PSP and CDPQ), PJT RSSG Culture?, Public Finance Investment Banking Information, Best Cultures on the Street
bump
Generally the Canadian pension funds have better WLB than MFs and tend to be less intense, however on live deals it will still be similar to large cap as they will compete on the same deals. The key difference is the velocity of transactions between the funds, as pension funds will tend to write significantly fewer checks than PE funds. Whereas pension funds might do 3/4 (max) deals a year globally, the MFs will do this amount in each region they operate in traditional markets. You will be exposed to more transactions in large cap but that comes with increased intensity of course.
On the pension funds themselves, OMERS have really struggled recently and have been burned by assets where they held a minority stake (Thames Water for example). This is pushing them to look at more majority stake opportunities but this is largely unproven for them given they typically parter and hold 50% in most of the assets they hold. CPP has been very active in Europe and have heard good things about the team. OTPP have been very quiet in recent years as their deployment has been at a standstill so interesting to see how they act in the coming years
Optio labore quisquam sint id. Molestias saepe omnis at omnis consequatur sed. Ea ut debitis ducimus natus eveniet placeat. Amet magni in et officiis alias. Architecto quod sapiente autem et possimus et. Non sit sapiente exercitationem officiis autem consequatur quae. Aut doloribus aspernatur minus debitis ipsum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...