Top Growth (Insight/GA) vs MF Tech PE out of UG

Thoughts on these options. Is upstream mobility to buyout / HF (or a thoma bravo etc) that tough from growth? Thoughts on these two choices for movement into sequoia / khosla esque VC?

 

Can only speak on Growth Equity Analysts but they are virtually just sourcing they don't touch the model and are oftentimes very distant from the other members of the firms. Speaking towards Insight/GA.

 

I would beg to differ. I’ve heard of accounts of people (at insight) who interacted with a grand total of one model up into their time as an associate. Kinda crazy.

 

When you join a heavily sourcing-oriented program you generally tend to exit to earlier stage or equivalent, rather than go later.

You only get model reps as an analyst/associate when a deal you source gets far enough to build one, which in this macro is not as often vs 2020/2021. Even then, growth-stage SaaS models are far lighter than the 3 statement model you'd pull together for larger buyout deals.

 
Most Helpful

I'd just consider the certainty with which you'd like to stay in growth. These heavy-sourcing roles provide a different skillset than a BX/KKR/Silver Lake analyst gig, precisely because the modeling (if there is any) is not only so rare for analysts, but also because where it exists its quite simple for earlier stake software companies.

You'll have no trouble moving from a place like Insight to a top VC or even a really solid growth shop. But it is essentially impossible to get a MF buyout or UMM buyout gig unless you're joining one of their growth teams after. MM or LMM PE may be more possible, but you'd have to prove you can do the technical reps to headhunters if you want any looks in their processes.

Growth and venture are fun worlds to be in that are facing a tough period right now and for the immediate future. Consider whether you want to be developing a social skillset in sourcing versus getting much more heavy technical reps. Both sets of offers are exceptional, they just offer quite different experiences.

 

Praesentium ea ducimus dicta numquam reprehenderit. Voluptatem at consequuntur laborum. Fugiat optio totam omnis facilis distinctio sit. Qui laboriosam officiis corporis ut blanditiis dolorum pariatur quis. A quam ut maxime corporis nesciunt iure a. Ducimus molestias expedita nihil nobis distinctio rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”