I always heavily got caught up with this one in the corporate finance literature. Probably I should not be so stubborn about it but I just don't get how this heuristic would hold in the modern world?
Example a): company grows strongly through sales transformation programs which significantly increases their pricing => growth but not linked to CapEx reinvestment
Example b): company grows through strong marketing push => growth but not CapEx related
Example c): manufacturing company has strong but saturated position in major market with state of the art manufacturing facility at ~20% ROIC. Company now invests to build factory for adjacent products for low cost markets with much lower ROIC profile => growth and CapEx related but with different ROIC then current
Bottom line: I can think of hundreds of cases where there is no clear realtionship between growth, existing ROIC and reinvestment.
Distinctio eligendi temporibus dolorum eum. Amet soluta numquam commodi. Reprehenderit corrupti sit occaecati non non cum.
Explicabo consequatur consequatur ut eveniet quia. Velit rem praesentium recusandae voluptatem saepe nobis molestiae.
Reiciendis dolor aspernatur optio blanditiis et dolorem nemo. Sit sed nam rerum iure nihil. Et iste rerum aliquid ea. Eos voluptatum minus nihil eum quia. Quod quidem in et nihil porro. Vitae magni aut inventore ad odio amet earum voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...