Why not value a cash flow positive software business off ARR instead of EBITDA?

I get why you can't value a business that isn't generating cash (let's say it's cash flow neutral) off of EBITDA, and as such would value off of ARR

But why not value a more mature software business off of ARR? (I understand that an EBITDA multiple values it off the cash flows, which is what you are buying it for, but why not ARR?)

Secondly, and this is the money question, what would valuations look like if you valued a mature software business off ARR? Would ARR multiples be similar to what they are for high growth, non-cash generating businesses that are typically valued off of ARR?

3 Comments
 

You could - if you’re buying a business with both EBITDA and revenue then there’s an implied multiple on each, and you could quote either one. Revenue multiples are often still used for companies that are viewed in “growth” stage - even if they’re EBITDA-positive
 

Ultimately though, profit is what the investor gets to take home, not revenue, so if you can only know one multiple it makes more sense to know how much you’re paying for every dollar of profit rather than every dollar of revenue. Typically, non-earnings multiples are more relevant when you need a proxy for earnings / earnings capabilities - but if you already know EBITDA you don’t need a proxy

 

You certainly could value off of ARR, but that masks the fact that companies have different margin structures. Valuations and divergence between companies on valuation are typically a function of growth, sustainability of that growth and terminal unit economics. On a growth-adjusted basis, you'd probably see a greater dispersion in ARR multiples for mature software businesses because unit economics are better known (i.e., investors are solving for EBITDA multiples to adjust for that difference in margin structure). Most pre-profit software businesses put out a generic "80/20" terminal unit economics target and barring any other data points I suspect most investors take that at face value.

 

Ut minima vel quia est excepturi. Consectetur quasi quo veritatis sapiente incidunt voluptatum sequi maiores. Eveniet optio non consectetur quam cumque.

Et accusamus dolores velit aspernatur eos cum tempora. Nemo et eius maiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”