Acquisition Team Staffing & Responsibilities

Curious how everyone's acquisition teams are structured from a staffing perspective and how everyone's responsibilities are allocated. Our team seems to be top heavy with just one analyst/associate and four acquisition officers. As a result, the younger officers are expected to take on all responsibilities including underwriting, due diligence, memo preparation, admin work, etc. while simultaneously sourcing, negotiating, leading investment committee, and being the market lead for all asset classes within their respective markets. 

For context, I'm at an institutional shop with $25B+ in AUM, so feel free to include your firm size, along with any other resources you have at your disposal (i.e. analysts/associates, internal/external due diligence teams, administrative staff, etc.). 

Primarily just looking to understand if this structure and lack of resources is more common or if my firm is more of an outlier. 

13 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, acquisition team structures and responsibilities can vary significantly depending on the size of the firm, its focus, and available resources. Here's a breakdown of how teams are typically structured and responsibilities allocated:

1. Team Composition

  • Smaller Firms:
    • Teams are leaner, and individuals often wear multiple hats. Analysts/associates handle everything from underwriting, due diligence, and memo preparation to administrative tasks.
    • Acquisitions professionals may also lead sourcing, negotiations, and investment committee presentations.
  • Larger Firms (Institutional Shops):
    • Larger firms often have more specialized roles. For example:
      • Analysts/associates focus on underwriting, modeling, and preparing investment committee materials.
      • Dedicated due diligence teams handle property condition reports, zoning, and other technical aspects.
      • Senior officers focus on sourcing, negotiations, and high-level decision-making.

2. Responsibilities Allocation

  • At Smaller Shops:
    • Analysts/associates are deeply involved in all aspects of the deal process, including underwriting, due diligence, and even legal coordination.
    • Acquisitions officers may take on broader responsibilities, including sourcing and market leadership.
  • At Larger Shops:
    • Junior team members (analysts/associates) handle the heavy lifting on underwriting, modeling, and due diligence.
    • Senior team members focus on sourcing, negotiations, and maintaining relationships with brokers and partners.
    • Some firms have in-house legal teams or external consultants to assist with due diligence and legal matters.

3. Resource Allocation

  • Internal Resources:
    • Larger firms often have internal due diligence teams, in-house legal counsel, and administrative staff to support the acquisitions team.
    • Smaller firms may rely on external consultants for due diligence and legal work.
  • Junior Team Responsibility:
    • In many cases, junior team members are expected to prepare memos, conduct market research, and assist with investment committee presentations.

4. Your Firm's Structure

  • Your firm's structure, with one analyst/associate and four acquisition officers, seems to place a heavy burden on junior staff. This setup is not uncommon in smaller or mid-sized firms but is less typical for institutional shops with $25B+ AUM.
  • At larger firms, it's more common to see a better balance of responsibilities, with dedicated teams for underwriting, due diligence, and administrative tasks to support acquisitions officers.

5. Is Your Firm an Outlier?

  • While your firm's structure isn't unheard of, it does seem more resource-constrained compared to other institutional shops of similar size. Many larger firms aim to provide more support to their acquisitions officers to allow them to focus on high-value tasks like sourcing and negotiations.

If you're feeling stretched thin, it might be worth discussing resource allocation with leadership or benchmarking against other firms in your network to highlight potential inefficiencies.

Sources: Life in Acquisitions (Analyst/Associate), Life in Acquisitions (Analyst/Associate), Q&A: REIT Acquisitions Associate, Acquisitions Analyst Advice - New Analysts, Q&A: Real Estate Acquisitions Analyst. Uni -> BO -> Mtg Financing -> Acquisitions

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

AUM $5B, we mainly focus multi family, condo and ground up. I am the only one analyst there with 1 project manager, 1 office manager, 1 construction partner, and the big boss who oversees the business. So, it’s pretty tough to work as an analyst there. I have to responsible for everything of underwriting. Since, I have been there for only 2 months, so maybe they have a few finance guys before I joined them.

 

In most institutional real estate shops—especially at the $25B+ AUM level—you’ll typically see a more balanced acquisitions structure than what you’re describing. It’s common to have a stronger analyst/associate layer so the officers can stay focused on sourcing, negotiations, and IC prep rather than juggling underwriting, DD, admin, and market-lead responsibilities all at once.

A typical setup at comparable firms usually looks something like:

  • 1–2 analysts or associates per acquisitions officer
  • A dedicated underwriting or research team (internal or outsourced)
  • Access to external consultants for financial/technical due diligence
  • Admin or transaction support to manage coordination and documentation
  • Officers primarily handling sourcing, relationship management, and final IC-level oversight

When those junior and mid-level resources aren’t in place, the workload gets pushed downward and outward, and younger officers end up doing everything. That structure is more common in mid-market firms—not usually in large institutional platforms where deal velocity is high and specialization matters.

So yes, your setup sounds a bit like an outlier for a firm of that size. Most groups invest in a deeper talent bench to keep officers from burning out and to maintain consistency in underwriting and execution quality.

If your team ever explores rebalancing or adding analyst/associate support, firms often lean on recruitment partners to build out that junior pipeline. At Alliance Recruitment Agency, we work with real estate investment teams to structure and staff acquisitions groups more efficiently, but the general takeaway is: your experience isn’t the industry norm at the institutional level.

 

I’ll speak to my exp at RxR.

The acquisitions team was made up of 4 ppl, analyst, associate, two vp’s all overseen by the group head.

Deal sourcing wasn’t really a priority but that’s also bc the time I was there office was on a tear, we had a JV with BX — I’d say deals were certainly abound.

Responsibilities included building the Argus model, repositioning the underwing model (excel) to run the return profile at deal and partnership level, involvement in establishing the business plan, prepare the deck then one of us runs the IC meeting.

If the king said go, run the DD, at that point it’s about everyone picking up the slack to get the deal quickly as possible.

Deal closes, hand the model over to asset management, onto the next one.

Boom.

 
Most Helpful

Suscipit ut voluptatibus repellendus sed. Ex est et id sequi laudantium quam. Dolor expedita necessitatibus placeat sit.

Saepe non sed ipsa id. Minima id qui est velit laudantium. Non aliquam repellendus esse tenetur repellat facilis veniam quia. Asperiores est necessitatibus dolor sed non.

Harum dolore qui culpa facere a. Vitae quam cum numquam atque ipsa. Sed neque voluptatem perspiciatis numquam et. Rerum omnis nulla excepturi sapiente temporibus excepturi. Repellat rerum rerum officia itaque et corporis rerum. Ut ex perferendis voluptas eveniet ducimus similique nisi.

Impedit veritatis totam ipsa nostrum eligendi beatae assumenda. In voluptas illum et et ut. Ex pariatur accusamus minus ut quasi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”