Acquisitions DD/modeling - side gig?

Hi y’all,

This is not really in my wheelhouse so was hoping to get thoughts on this. I’m looking into a side gig (that may grow into a full time role) with a small shop. Really small family office focusing on multifamily. It’s a 1099 contractor role. Not sure to charge hourly or a flat/fixed fee per deal? I would be the only acquisition guy and would be the lead on underwriting deals, due diligence, and sourcing debt and helping line up investor equity.

What is a reasonable amount to charge? Does it make sense to charge hourly or by deal?

Thank you!

9 Comments
 

Based on previous WSO threads, here are some insights that might help you decide on your compensation structure for a side gig in acquisitions due diligence and modeling:

Compensation Structure:

  1. Hourly Rate vs. Flat Fee:

    • Hourly Rate: This can be beneficial if the scope of work is uncertain or if the time commitment varies significantly from deal to deal. It ensures you are compensated for all the hours you put in.
    • Flat Fee: This can be advantageous if you have a clear understanding of the workload and can estimate the time required accurately. It provides the client with a predictable cost structure.
  2. Factors to Consider:

    • Scope of Work: Since you will be the lead on underwriting deals, due diligence, sourcing debt, and helping line up investor equity, the workload can be substantial. Ensure that your compensation reflects the breadth of responsibilities.
    • Market Rates: Research what others in similar roles are charging. This can vary based on location, experience, and the complexity of the deals.
    • Carry Possibility: Consider if there is an opportunity to earn a percentage of the profits (carry) from successful deals. This can be a significant incentive if the deals are profitable.

Example from WSO Context:

  • In a similar scenario discussed on WSO, a user was approached to serve as a de facto analyst for a developer on a big project. They were unsure whether to charge a flat fee or hourly and considered the possibility of carry. This suggests that both compensation structures are common, and the choice depends on the specifics of the role and personal preference.

Recommendations:

  • Start with an Hourly Rate: If you are unsure about the time commitment, starting with an hourly rate can protect you from underestimating the workload.
  • Negotiate a Flat Fee for Specific Tasks: For well-defined tasks or phases of the project, a flat fee can be more straightforward.
  • Consider a Hybrid Approach: You might charge an hourly rate for initial due diligence and a flat fee for successful deal closures.
  • Discuss Carry: If the family office is open to it, negotiating a carry can align your incentives with the success of the deals.

Conclusion:

Ultimately, the best approach depends on your comfort level with estimating the workload and your preference for predictable income versus potential upside. Open communication with the family office about their expectations and your compensation needs will be crucial.

I'm sorry, but it looks like this may be out of my ability to answer... maybe some of the links below might help?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

I started out doing this. Here is how I did it, results may vary / you may need to do more cold out reach to people to pitch your services.

> Started on upwork.com / $30 USD an hour > got first few good reviews > increased rate $60 / hour > 1 or 2 more reviews > raised rate to 125 an hour > brought clients off of upwork to do direct billing after that. Upwork great for initial boost to build your sample work (very important as you use this later). 

> Start your own site, post your sample work on there (you can actually do this step 1). Cold outreach to people you want to sell to. Easiest are transaction based people because you just slide into the deal fee and they're less cheap than owners. Middle market also good opportunity. Retired or older folks also good opportunity as they heavy into relationships and don't know how to create OMs or excel models

> Charge per project, not per hour 

> collect 25-50% deposit upfront, deliver watermarked work in PDF, ask for final payment > deliver final product. 

> start a wine bar in portugal

PropMetrica | Multifamily underwriting template
 

Upwork has gotten a lot more competitive. Keep in mind my upwork period was during the crazy hot markets of last few years. 

There is more international talent bidding rates at 10-25 usd an hour. Hard to compete now. Don't focus all in on upwork, check it once a day or every few days max and just set up your profile to public if you're comfortable. 

Your main focus has to be about reaching out to potential customers. Create a fake sample presentation, pitch deck, excel deal analysis, etc. and start sending it out to players in the industry trying to set up calls, add value, etc. You're essentially an agency at this point so you can research how agencies find clients.

PropMetrica | Multifamily underwriting template
 

To answer your question, unless the deliverable is very clear, I'd charge per hour. That role in your write up sounds way too general and I could see the scope always increasing if you do a project based fee. Scope creep. 

You could charge 75 per hour on the low end, 150 on the high end. 

PropMetrica | Multifamily underwriting template
 

I've done this in the past and by the hour is necessary.  a lot of the people looking to outsource modeling are relatively unsophisticated and uncertain on exactly what they want.  I would've blown my brains out with some of the requested edits if it wasn't by the hour.  

I was $80/hr but suspected I could've gotten more. I only requested payment at completion of the model, that made the relationship run smoother and I never got screwed but it is a risk.

This is also your value-add over someone thats $15 an hour over seas, you can (or should be able to) explain how the model is functioning and interpret their requests.  

 

Sit sunt aut id recusandae. Pariatur ullam dolor facere eos iste officia totam pariatur. Asperiores animi est dolorem aliquid sit totam. Voluptas eum autem temporibus non enim. Rerum placeat voluptatem et consequuntur sapiente est tempore aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (70) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”