Agency Floaters & Cap Costs
Disclaimer * I work at a direct agency lender and have access to massive amounts of servicing data.
Just a PSA that if anyone here works at a shop that has taken on agency floating rate debt over the last few years, you need to be budgeting for your monthly escrow & reserve costs to increase anywhere from 10 - 15x in the coming months.
Agency floaters require servicers to mark-to-market their borrower's interest rate cap escrow amounts every 6 months. We're now seeing deals that originated in April/May/June of last year have reserve payments that are almost equal to their IO payments.
On one deal in particular:
Prior Month Payment - ~$151k total ($114k interest / $31k tax escrow / $13k reserves (replacement reserves + interest cap escrow)
Current Month Payment - $297k total ($127k interest (Increase in underlying index that is still below the strike rate) / $53k tax escrow / $116k reserves (replacement reserves + interest cap escrow).
Just because you purchased your rate cap before the massive price hike & not facing an immediate expiration does not mean you're insulated from this market. Cash-on-cash about to take a hit...
3 of the deals in my direct AM portfolio have had this occur. Looking at forward curves for SOFR, our interest expense will literally double, with escrows 10x’ing.
Do you have any sources you can share that explains this mark to market process?
I don't understand why your cap escrow would increase so much if you purchased the cap before interest rates increase. Seems to me like the market to market would benefit you and your cap would be worth more.
Edit: I think I've answered my question. Fannie Mae requires an interest rate cap, but if your cap term is less than the loan term then you are required to make monthly payments to buy a replacement cap. As rates increase, the value of the replacement cap increases which would increase the monthly payment amount. Is this what you're referring to?
The mark to market isn't on the cap you bought, it's on the next cap you're going to need per the loan agreement.
Typically on floating loans with a cap you don't buy a cap for the whole period, you typically purchase a 3 year cap and then your bank will make you escrow money to purchase a similar cap when that one expires to cover the next 3 years/remainder of the loan. The banks look at current/future cap pricing to determine how much you need to escrow. If cap costs go through the roof (which they have) then the bank will force you to escrow more.
After looking through loan agreements, it appears that the initial strike rate at closing also gets pegged as a ceiling for the replacement cap. I.E, if you closed with a 1.90% cap, your replacement cap cannot be for a strike rate greater than 1.90%.
What may have been viewed as a prudent, conservative insurance policy 1-2 years ago could turn into a massive ongoing liability for some of these borrowers.
Curious, is the rise in escrow costs for a replacement caps an agency thing or is it the same with banks that do 3-5 year floaters for value add deals as well?
In my experience (which is very anectodal), Agencies require it, and for other institution it varies. We have a loan with one group that doesn't require it and another that does.
Similique qui expedita voluptas veniam alias. Odio asperiores quo optio reiciendis dicta sed. Porro adipisci et ut magni blanditiis. Enim tenetur itaque cupiditate odio quisquam.
Deleniti iusto facere dolor placeat magnam voluptas eaque necessitatibus. Eos omnis voluptas quia tempora natus doloremque nihil. Ipsum quo temporibus ratione molestiae eius deleniti quis.
Voluptas aut ex enim et laborum. Et perferendis amet ut earum dolor qui molestiae. Ipsum voluptatem ut ullam harum.
Eaque reiciendis sit porro reiciendis. Eveniet omnis delectus alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...