23 Comments
 

Berkadia will never cut jobs. Since they are private the firm will do everything they can before removing labor. As for other firms, seems like the first wave has already hit.

 

Their servicing book it’s the largest in the multi family industry. That’s their bread and butter. Originations can be fully supported by their servicing book for an entire cycle.

 

Their servicing book it's the largest in the multi family industry. That's their bread and butter. Originations can be fully supported by their servicing book for an entire cycle.

This isn't an answer for "why never."  It's an answer for why they don't have to.  If they see a lean couple years, why wouldn't they cut staff?  They're not running a charity.  Your deal comes up and they renegotiate a split that's so disadvantageous as to essentially be a layoff.

Besides, intern or not, I sincerely doubt you have the insight into their P&L to tell us with confidence that their servicing book can, in effect, float the entire company for a period of several years or more ("an entire cycle")

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Their servicing book it's the largest in the multi family industry. That's their bread and butter. Originations can be fully supported by their servicing book for an entire cycle.

So very clearly this kid works at Berkadia. Just to clarify, he is assuming loan originations income supports all capital markets/brokerage which is not true. Either this or he didnt read the OPs question at all. Anyways at CBRE we have a servicing portfolio too, but its a completely different departments. This like saying Bank of America will never layoff anyone in the trading division because their retail lending is doing so well. Clearly this person has no concept of how corporations are run.

 
Most Helpful

I also work at Berkadia - the servicing narrative gets floated as a means to calm nerves during times of uncertainty.

Hypothetically, we are all told that our servicing income can cover all overhead (MB & IS) in a doomsday scenario of zero production. Nonetheless, as others have mentioned, it's not like management wouldn't reduce headcount if long term profitability is trending down. We're just better insulated from short-term volatility shocks & knee jerk layoffs due to not being listed on the NYSE. 

I don't think we made any immediate cuts at the onset of peak COVID uncertainty, and that was ultimately the right move looking back @ 2020 & 2021 volumes. Things this time around appear to be very different.

 

I don't think loan servicing and loan originations are the same thing.  I mean, I agree with your overall point completely, but loan servicing is more about the fees charged to do the housekeeping on an existing mortgage, whereas originations is fees generated by doing new business.

The (really shitty) point the OP was making was that the servicing business does well enough to cover overhead.  Which is of course inherently impossible, because over time loans mature or default and the servicing fees dry up: you really can't make the argument in good faith for more than a very short period of time.  Obviously the loan originations business is in for a lean few months, if not longer, to say the least.

 

This info is a bit stale but I had some Berkadia analyst level friends on the debt side from like 2014-2018 who made a killing on bonuses but their base salary was only $50k despite working long hours.  Bonuses were six figures since they were on super productive teams.  I was also friends with a more senior/MD level guy there too who did very very well but told me his base salary was shockingly low and basically minimum wage for the amount of hours he worked on its own.

 

Some of my friends from larger institutional and top IS teams are talking about potential staff cuts in the upcoming weeks/months. Looks like the tech industry has shown that some firms/teams have over hired during COVID. Obviously, this is dependent on staff size and how quickly the firm or team has grown in the past few years. My team leads have talked about cutting out research, marketing and junior analysts as well but I work with a smaller brokerage firm. 

 

Consectetur tempora sint fugiat consequuntur esse facilis dolor. Eos quod dolor soluta rerum quo quos recusandae dolor. Saepe eaque qui est qui quos et voluptatem nihil. Aut nulla totam et porro incidunt quia nemo.

Fuga consectetur neque aut est ratione id molestias. Id facilis omnis autem qui illum ex. Sunt saepe ut nostrum odio dolores id sit. Ad possimus nesciunt placeat eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”