8 Comments
 

I prefer equity because you have to deal with the details of building operations. While many people may tell you if you are trying to switch from debt to equity, they aren’t the same, it’s the most bullsh*t thing I’ve ever heard. The only difference is that on the debt side, you care a bit less about capex and so you don’t scrutinize it as hard. 
 

As someone who’s done equity investment (core/core plus/ value add/ development) and debt investment (senior, bridge, construction, mezz,) and pref equity, it’s all the same. Literally you go through the exact same process just have different drivers of your thought process as you’re in a different part of the capital stack. 
 

Personally, I prefer equity because you deal with the operations and capex items. You’re figuring out what makes the property tick. When I was a bridge lender, and was lending 65% LTC with future funding, if leasing didn’t happen, I didn’t really care because my position was safe. So like-it’s just a different thought process. 

 

Agreed... Done LP investing and Debt Fund originations... it's the same underwriting for just about all of it. As you mentioned you're more concerned with the capex on equity rather than just a plug from the PCA. You're also doing waterfalls and returns that you may not be doing on the debt side depending on how you're structured (though let's be honest the model helps filter through, you just need to know mechanics of it to be able to switch deal by deal). Otherwise, opex is still opex, RE Taxes are still RE taxes, Other income still other income etc. 

 

No. Not sure where you worked on debt, sure there are different scopes for eng/Reno budgets. But you’re digging in just as much, often more… especially today to ensure deal is structured correctly. Debt funds are HY yield bridge lenders (most often), the literal reason you’re getting their debt is to execute a biz plan… so renovate or lease up an asset (leasing dollars). So dumbing it down, most important aspect in the deal is UW the biz plan / thus ensuring what the capex work is, if we’re capitalized, and structuring docs accordingly. Also repe in most cases rely on the gp for the boots on the ground execution (obviously). Saying they’re closer to the deal is meh not truly accurate. You run excel models and read mkt reports … and engage vendors for their opinion (same as debt).

 

If talking a PE/pc sponsor credit fund .. effectively same work. It’s HY debt. Half of them do equity and pref/mezz in their funds too. Literally same DD. Personal decision .. more flow in credit more structured aspects. Personally credit / structured fin guys are smarter (across the board in finance… pc, bond traders, etc vs their counterpart ). I'd note, we're in a credit mkt for the foreseeable future (rip bull run)… chatted w MF repe principal yesterday … not looking hot .. can't even raise lol. Ppl on this forum love equity bc it's the riskiest/highest yielding etc etc… until its wiped (today). Yes I'm in credit.

 
Most Helpful

Credit vs. equity is too simplistic of a debate. I've worked in a large developer and now I work in a REPE fund which invests across the capital structure. There is pretty limited difference between credit and LP equity. DD is pretty similar and the operating partner is driving the project forward, the only significant difference is on the LP equity side I'm involved throughout the project lifecycle and still signing off on key decisions. If you're working with a competent operating partner, you'll typically always be aligned on the decisions to be made and their analysis to support the decision is clear. 

Where it gets very different is on the operating partner side. You're creating the business plan, getting others to buy into it, and then delivering it. You can spend years unlocking opportunities before they finally come to a position where you're bringing in equity and debt. Once you've capital in, now you need to deliver the business plan and are running entitlement / capex / leasing / exit etc workstreams depending on what the project involves. Very different workstreams to underwriting something and taking it through IC. 

If you want to be on the investment side I would recommend an opportunistic REPE fund / special sits fund which can do across the cap stack. Typically no shortage of opportunities as there's always some form of dislocation which creates opportunities, we constantly pivot depending on where we see the most attractive returns. 

I'm happy I've spent a few years on the investment side, but I definitely want to go back to operating partner side for long term. Unless you're a deal person, investment gets pretty boring and repetitive once you've worked on enough opportunities. Operating partner is a lot more varied and intellectually stimulating as long as you don't get pigeonholed into a particular role.

 

Dolores qui saepe molestias iste. Perferendis ea minus ducimus et aut consequatur. Dolorem aperiam esse aspernatur natus temporibus minima id. Eveniet occaecati architecto sapiente consequuntur suscipit perspiciatis possimus ut. Quia voluptatibus corrupti sed aut accusantium soluta. Quo adipisci perspiciatis deserunt.

Magni odio natus eos modi laboriosam voluptas ipsum iure. Quia et et illo atque odit eaque. Quos nisi animi doloribus deleniti omnis est perspiciatis accusantium. Molestiae est aut nihil ea illo quidem eum.

At et labore quis aspernatur quibusdam nihil facere. Aut inventore ut qui delectus. Est est et in nihil reiciendis ratione. Minus voluptates vitae accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”