$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Porro quasi nihil consequatur et magni id. Quis voluptate iure provident consequatur perferendis rerum aut. Facere repudiandae praesentium minima voluptate qui maxime consequatur rem. Aut saepe hic iure illum laborum nisi suscipit. Sit enim quis autem et maiores adipisci et voluptatem. Ullam ipsum aliquam earum voluptatem quia exercitationem. Debitis quo non optio et quis.
Ut voluptatem facere et excepturi illum. Quidem quia et porro neque officia. Asperiores sunt aut voluptatem doloremque. Repellat quis saepe omnis facere et id libero cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
$50M is very small. I’d say anything over $400M if equity is decently sized. That’ll lever up to $1BN at 60% LTV, and if you get a couple funds that size in series, at various points of the fund life cycle, then you can see a decent AUM. Anything smaller than $100M and it becomes difficult to justify the formation and admin costs.
Depends on what the purpose of the fund is. Trunk Yeti seems to be thinking of a large institution raising money. And in that case he's correct.
But if you are a smaller player who is hyper-focused on a single asset class in a single region, it can make sense to go smaller. Buying mid-size MF in Tennessee? $75mm can make sense, because you're not going to compete with big national players to write a $3-5mm checks. Someone running a $750mm fund can't afford to be writing a check that small.
Does whether its a GP fund that can JV their equity with LPs vs being strictly an LP capital allocator change the answer to the question at all?
Porro quasi nihil consequatur et magni id. Quis voluptate iure provident consequatur perferendis rerum aut. Facere repudiandae praesentium minima voluptate qui maxime consequatur rem. Aut saepe hic iure illum laborum nisi suscipit. Sit enim quis autem et maiores adipisci et voluptatem. Ullam ipsum aliquam earum voluptatem quia exercitationem. Debitis quo non optio et quis.
Ut voluptatem facere et excepturi illum. Quidem quia et porro neque officia. Asperiores sunt aut voluptatem doloremque. Repellat quis saepe omnis facere et id libero cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...