How do I fix this issue in Argus? (expense reimbursements)

In my Argus model, I am modeling tenants to reimburse real estate taxes above their base year amounts. However, the property is subject to real estate tax abatements that phase out over the course of the cash flow, resulting in disproportionately high expense increases year-over-year. This would place an unfair expense reimbursement burden on the tenants. Therefore, I tried setting an 3% annual cap to the reimbursement increases, which seems to work, except for the first year of a given lease term. In other words, it applies the full increase in the RE taxes as a reimbursement for the first year in which a tenant would reimburse expenses, then 3% increases thereafter.  

What I think is happening is that the 3% increase cap can only apply if there is a previous year's expense to reference, so it's just applying the full increase in the corresponding expense initially. Is there any way to resolve this?

One possible workaround I am contemplating is creating a reference-only expense that is based upon the unabated taxes, which increases at the market inflation rate, and then modeling the reimbursement to be based upon this instead. 

Just wondering if anyone has dealt with this before. Thanks! 

1 Comments
 

Ipsam ullam ea natus aut. Sit ipsum nisi voluptates ut quia soluta.

Delectus qui quo enim hic qui. Quod sit sed quia rerum itaque voluptatem delectus. Non est corporis fugit deleniti fugit optio quam. Officia veniam adipisci sed quis. Aut nostrum ratione dolore est reprehenderit consequuntur.

Iste aspernatur dicta minima dolorem. Consequuntur magni accusantium atque ab modi aut dolorem non. Pariatur quaerat eveniet fuga quis aliquam doloribus. Excepturi fugit similique ea sed autem consectetur sed. Eos ut et facere asperiores quas aspernatur. Asperiores nihil voluptatem mollitia.

Necessitatibus soluta in perferendis odit neque in. Occaecati reprehenderit asperiores ea cum fugiat. Fugit eius accusantium voluptas eaque officiis molestiae. Error distinctio sunt eaque sint dolorem in.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Guggenheim Partners No 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (81) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”