HOW TO MODEL LAND VALUE VS COST IN A RE PRO FORMA

Can someone help me understand the following:

Lets say I buy a piece of property for $2.5mm and after the entitlement process, its value increases to $5mm. Now I want to raise debt and LP equity and I will be contributing the land valued at $5mm as GP equity. How do I model this on a project level Pro Forma and on the Capital stack? 

because if I increase the land cost to $5mm:

1. Value doe not equal cost / cash outflow, so modeling this as a $5mm cash outflow would be false

1. Therefore it skews the returns of the project so negatively that it becomes unattractive

Basically, the total development cost of the project would need to be $2.5mm and the capital stack / partnership would need to show the actual value $5mm.

7 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You'd do two separate models. One model for you (and any partners) who are buying the land at $2.5mm and doing the entitlement work, and one for the future partners/debt providers who are getting the land at a $5mm value for the project. You're solving to two separate returns for two separate risk profiles. I would start backward from the 2nd model - with construction costs and forecasted NOI of whatever I am planning to build, at whatever return a developer would require on a new development (150-200bps+ north of spot cap rates), solve to an entitled land cost. Then take that value ($5mm in your example) and solve backward to what you can pay for it today given the entitlement process/costs/risks. As you move into 2nd phase of project, you're going to have a separate return waterfall for the two groups of investors, so you will run model #2 to get the cash flow to all investors in the development and drop the portion that gets paid to you as GP into model #1 to get returns/splits to the investors in the original dirt. 

Simple example: you want to build a multifamily project on a site that is zoned for something else today. Coastal submarket, need +/-6% stabilized return on cost for your multifamily development - $45mm of project costs (excluding land) and anticipated NOI of $3mm means that your entitled land is worth $5mm. Assume it's a discretionary entitlement process with a little bit of hair, so you'd want opportunistic returns on that part (20%+). Assume you're going to spend $100k in entitlements and it's going to take you 3 years, a 25% annual return would result in a value you can pay for the dirt today of $2.5mm. 

 

Project level model will have the land at the new value - if it's worth that you should be looking at it as the opportunity cost vs. selling (i.e. if you wouldn't do the deal at market value of land, you may be better off selling it).

Then above project level for the GP you're going to show their cash flow starting from time of original acquisition at the cost they paid rather than the new land cost new investors are coming in at, but the GP will also receive an outsized share of distributions than that cash outflow would suggest because they're getting a lift in their equity value from contributing the land (i.e. if total equity is $20M and land is worth $5M, the party contributing land will get a 25% ownership share rather than the 12.5% their $2.5M cash injection would suggest).

Alternatively as said by another poster you can run two separate models.

 

Corporis cupiditate assumenda eos. Qui velit itaque molestiae. Occaecati est perspiciatis distinctio dolores placeat amet. Velit inventore id ut et corrupti et rerum.

Soluta ipsum quo porro molestiae sed. Illum fugit at optio necessitatibus itaque. Voluptatem debitis cupiditate distinctio vel.

Sapiente voluptates aut repellat non et ex et. Quo eos quaerat quia. Et autem expedita molestias quas provident ipsa aut vero. Eos tempore molestiae minima accusantium eum ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”